we NEEEEED a twin screw.

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

05-17-2007, 01:15 AM

#31

8cd03gro

5th Gear Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: Mar 2006

Location: CO

Posts: 3,095

RE: we NEEEEED a twin screw.

ok wtf i just wrote a post for another thread and it ended up here nvm this.

05-17-2007, 01:24 AM

#32

Krazer

2nd Gear Member

Join Date: Nov 2006

Location:

Posts: 166

RE: we NEEEEED a twin screw.

Quote:

ORIGINAL: chrisc

and....the X only sold so many because of the fact that they sould 28 units with $800 off the list price.

Chrisc it was $400.00 off not $800.00 trust me.

1-10 units $200.00 off
10-18 units $400.00 off

Once it went over ten units sold thenwe recieved $400.00 off list price.

05-17-2007, 01:56 AM

#33

8cd03gro

5th Gear Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: Mar 2006

Location: CO

Posts: 3,095

RE: we NEEEEED a twin screw.

Quote:

ORIGINAL: Krazer

Quote:

ORIGINAL: fazm

there is no % conversion from mustang dyno to dynojet. there are averages, there are lots of variables. ive seen a MD read higher than a dynojet before, and ive seen one read 20% lower.

I agree with this without a doubt on some Mustang dynosbut the guys at the 4.0 forum who have work done by PowerHouse say his is around 10-12 pecent lower than a dynojet. Looking at your numbers on a dynojet per psi/rwhp& rwtqfrom previous post from what I rememberand comparing to Rygens old numbers and Buckmans it does seemclose to what they aresayingabout a 10-12% difference on PowerHouse's Mustang dyno vs a dynojet.

I would really like to seedynojet numbers vs XX tunersMustang Dynonumbers.
But if you look at Powerhouses numbers on that X Charger that was on a auto so add 10-15rwhp for a maunal and you would be around 296 rwhpand would be inline with XX's results. So XX numbersdo look good at298 rwhp (on a Musatng Dyno)which would be inline with Powerhouses numbers on the auto vs manual.

im not trying to be a nay-sayer, and im sure powerhouses dyno reads lower than a dj, but also keep in mind fazm isn't running cats and is a manual. He could be seeing an extra 20whp from going catless. Turbo's go ape **** when you take those cats out.