Notices
V6 S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V6 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

Another dumb newbie question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-2007, 06:33 PM
  #11  
furie
 
furie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 13
Default RE: What about...

Let's see....S2000 gets worse mpg, doesn't have any backseat, trunk is a laundry basket and is ricey throughout the whole rpm range.
I'd rather be seen cruising in my stang v6 vert at 80mph at 2.5k rpms.
I know, I really considered a S2000 before deciding upon my stang vert.


Furie

2005 Mustang Vert
K&N drop in filter.
Tune and other mods coming soon.
furie is offline  
Old 06-28-2007, 08:40 PM
  #12  
lepton137
Thread Starter
 
lepton137's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 10
Default RE: What about...

ORIGINAL: furie

Let's see....S2000 gets worse mpg, doesn't have any backseat, trunk is a laundry basket and is ricey throughout the whole rpm range.
I'd rather be seen cruising in my stang v6 vert at 80mph at 2.5k rpms.
I know, I really considered a S2000 before deciding upon my stang vert.


Furie

2005 Mustang Vert
K&N drop in filter.
Tune and other mods coming soon.
I know.... No weight of a back seat, no weight of a roof, and all aluminum construction with paper thin paint.All it has that I likeis an RPM band a mile long, and a really slick shifter. 238hp and a 166 torque though.... OurV6's with all that torque just have to be be able to stomp that car....

lepton137 is offline  
Old 06-28-2007, 08:45 PM
  #13  
Stang_Heritage07
2nd Gear Member
 
Stang_Heritage07's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 391
Default RE: What about...

ORIGINAL: lepton137

ORIGINAL: furie

Let's see....S2000 gets worse mpg, doesn't have any backseat, trunk is a laundry basket and is ricey throughout the whole rpm range.
I'd rather be seen cruising in my stang v6 vert at 80mph at 2.5k rpms.
I know, I really considered a S2000 before deciding upon my stang vert.


Furie

2005 Mustang Vert
K&N drop in filter.
Tune and other mods coming soon.
I know.... No weight of a back seat, no weight of a roof, and all aluminum construction with paper thin paint.All it has that I likeis an RPM band a mile long, and a really slick shifter. 238hp and a 166 torque though.... OurV6's with all that torque just have to be be able to stomp that car....

yeah well our torque is pretty much a null set against that lightweight of a car w/ that high RPM bandwidth, plus being so low I would imagine it gets a lot better traction than us
Stang_Heritage07 is offline  
Old 06-28-2007, 08:59 PM
  #14  
cam2904
4th Gear Member
 
cam2904's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 1,175
Default RE: What about...

Easy answer just leave it alone.
cam2904 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dokilar
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
15
10-16-2015 08:13 PM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
3
10-02-2015 08:06 AM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
10-01-2015 10:29 AM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
10-01-2015 09:21 AM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM



Quick Reply: Another dumb newbie question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 AM.