Notices
V6 S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V6 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

CATS or NO CATS?

Old 10-06-2007, 08:52 PM
  #21  
Trmachuno
5th Gear Member
 
Trmachuno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 2,365
Default RE: CATS or NO CATS?

Personally, I like cats. Those little furry things r fun to play with. I got one but when I play with him too much he claws my hand bad. He's fun though and meows a lot. I think u should get some cats. Cats over no cats ftw!
Trmachuno is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 09:09 PM
  #22  
Sancho805
5th Gear Member
 
Sancho805's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,678
Default RE: CATS or NO CATS?


ORIGINAL: basketballord

http://www.superchevy.com/technical/...t/0505phr_exh/
Scroll down to "Headers -- Primary Pipe Diameters"
"Big pipes flow more, so is bigger better? Answer: absolutely not." Same goes for the cats/no cats argument I would think - there is an optimal level of exhaust flow...too much flow = no scavenging, too little = too much back pressure and decreased performance. Taking the cats off would be too much flow for a non - f/i V6, at least that's how I see it.
exactly.....thats been basically my whole point.
Sancho805 is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 09:15 PM
  #23  
basketballord
4th Gear Member
 
basketballord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Big Sky Country
Posts: 1,079
Default RE: CATS or NO CATS?

ORIGINAL: Sancho805


ORIGINAL: basketballord

http://www.superchevy.com/technical/...t/0505phr_exh/
Scroll down to "Headers -- Primary Pipe Diameters"
"Big pipes flow more, so is bigger better? Answer: absolutely not." Same goes for the cats/no cats argument I would think - there is an optimal level of exhaust flow...too much flow = no scavenging, too little = too much back pressure and decreased performance. Taking the cats off would be too much flow for a non - f/i V6, at least that's how I see it.
exactly.....thats been basically my whole point.
I'm confused then Sancho. I thought you were saying backpressure was all bad, but I was saying that you need some backpressure for exhaust scavenging.
basketballord is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 09:42 PM
  #24  
Sancho805
5th Gear Member
 
Sancho805's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,678
Default RE: CATS or NO CATS?

thats right.....backpressure is bad but some will exist nonetheless. i'm agreeeing about the point that there is an optimal level of exhaust flow: close to zero backpressure and maximum exit exhaust velocity. how does backpressure create scavenging when its bringing exhaust gas back to the cylinder? only good thing that could do is bring fresh air/fuel back into the cylinder during the valve overalap but that would also bring exhuast gases back in and contaminate. i'm sure all these negative things will happen at some degree but keeping them to a minimum will result in better effeciency.
Sancho805 is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 10:01 PM
  #25  
FlameDog
 
FlameDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7
Default RE: CATS or NO CATS?

Did you do the interior yourself? It looks beautiful!
FlameDog is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 10:28 PM
  #26  
ezell504
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
ezell504's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 114
Default RE: CATS or NO CATS?

ORIGINAL: FlameDog

Did you do the interior yourself? It looks beautiful!
Yea, seats were 900 and dash kit off ebay for 100. tv was a hook up.

As far as this debate....I think I will just go with some universal high flow cats and the slp.
ezell504 is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 10:47 PM
  #27  
basketballord
4th Gear Member
 
basketballord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Big Sky Country
Posts: 1,079
Default RE: CATS or NO CATS?

Good plan ezell.
basketballord is offline  
Old 10-07-2007, 12:09 AM
  #28  
Sancho805
5th Gear Member
 
Sancho805's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,678
Default RE: CATS or NO CATS?

haha....yeah, i'm done with it. anybody can research it and figure it out like i have. makes sense one you understand the whole backpressure concept. i see that pypes sells some high flow cats. anybody have em?
Sancho805 is offline  
Old 10-07-2007, 10:56 AM
  #29  
Stang_Heritage07
2nd Gear Member
 
Stang_Heritage07's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 391
Default RE: CATS or NO CATS?

ORIGINAL: ilmor

Sorry, but if you have a V6, you'll never get the "growl"...at least, I've never heard a V6 growl...
watch these vids
http://youtube.com/user/Chente2004
Stang_Heritage07 is offline  
Old 10-07-2007, 12:35 PM
  #30  
themac5150
3rd Gear Member
 
themac5150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 576
Default RE: CATS or NO CATS?

ORIGINAL: Caladius

Yea my friend got pulled over a month back and the cop was a complete jerk.. gave him a speeding ticket... bent over and looked under the car (no cats). wrote him a huge ticket. not worth it IMO.
Am I the only one on here that questions this police officers qualifications to look under the car for the converters? The converters are best seen from looking under the hood. They are not located in the conventional location, as a single,big, flat muffler looking part located somewhere between the duals coming from the engine and the pipes coming out the back. Not everyone knows what they are looking at. I'm throwing the BS flag on that one!
themac5150 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: CATS or NO CATS?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 AM.