Notices
V6 S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V6 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2008, 05:42 PM
  #1  
pthurm_28
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
pthurm_28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 430
Default mpg

which F/I system gets better mpg a turbo or supercharger
pthurm_28 is offline  
Old 01-02-2008, 06:15 PM
  #2  
The Potato
3rd Gear Member
 
The Potato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 569
Default RE: mpg

From what I know, the X-Charger supercharger keeps the same mpg as stock.

But that's all I know about mpg[>:]
The Potato is offline  
Old 01-02-2008, 07:13 PM
  #3  
Sancho805
5th Gear Member
 
Sancho805's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,678
Default RE: mpg

ima take a logical guess and say that a turbocharger gets better mpg since it "recycles" energy that is already created by the engine instead of stealing energy to make more energy like a supercharger does. just a guess.
Sancho805 is offline  
Old 01-02-2008, 07:18 PM
  #4  
noober
3rd Gear Member
 
noober's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 728
Default RE: mpg

I assume you have a V6 (since it's in this section) so I'd advise and I would IMAGINE the turbo chargers get better milage. As Sancho said - uses energy already created by the engine instead of stealing it away. No extra pulley = more HP as well = no extra force to overcome for the engine which = more fuel milage. The gains/differences are probably minimal though.
noober is offline  
Old 01-02-2008, 08:03 PM
  #5  
oshkoshbajawsh
I ♥ Acer
 
oshkoshbajawsh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,160
Default RE: mpg

its contingent
oshkoshbajawsh is offline  
Old 01-02-2008, 08:08 PM
  #6  
chrisc
5th Gear Member
 
chrisc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,696
Default RE: mpg

all superchargers will bring down your MPGs, regardless of what type they are. some brands say they wont bring it down, but in the end, it is an accessory spinning off the crank, in and out of boost.

turbos do not run off the crank, they run off exhaust gasses, so technically you are making the care more efficient, so you will actually gain a bit of MPGs
chrisc is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 06:42 PM
  #7  
pthurm_28
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
pthurm_28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 430
Default RE: mpg

so for fuel efficiency i should go turbo
pthurm_28 is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 07:20 PM
  #8  
Sancho805
5th Gear Member
 
Sancho805's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,678
Default RE: mpg

turbo = better mpg...........seems to make sense to me.
Sancho805 is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 10:46 PM
  #9  
bigd89101
 
bigd89101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 34
Default RE: mpg

yes turbo = better mpg because like they said turbo is just forcing more air in plus turbos start to spool aroudn 2500 rpms so as long as u keep rpms low and is drivin properly and shifted around 2000 or 2500 rpms it will make more mpg better because car doesnt have to work as hard to move...in the other hand superchargers are constantly making ur belts spin harder and faster no matter what rpm your car is at...supperchargers are better for racing though because turbos can only do so much and spool from lets say 2500rpms till about 5000 rpms superchargers spool the whole way
bigd89101 is offline  
Old 01-04-2008, 03:55 PM
  #10  
pthurm_28
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
pthurm_28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 430
Default RE: mpg

so with a turbo do you get better mpg that stock, about the same or less
pthurm_28 is offline  


Quick Reply: mpg



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 PM.