Notices
V6 S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V6 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

xcharger vs stg 2 ss s/c cobalt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2008, 12:06 PM
  #11  
DelStang86
2nd Gear Member
 
DelStang86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 383
Default RE: xcharger vs stg 2 ss s/c cobalt

yeah.. the injectors and pulley will put the car around 250whp, and he's got a huge curb weight advantage over you.
DelStang86 is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 12:10 PM
  #12  
Jsierzega
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Jsierzega's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 542
Default RE: xcharger vs stg 2 ss s/c cobalt


ORIGINAL: LX200

The Cobalt probably makes it's torque at 4500 RPM, right? That should give the X a big advantage.
the cobalt also uses an eaton blower, like the x, so i would imagine it would make boost pretty low as well. deff. not 4500, its not a turbo lol
Jsierzega is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 12:54 PM
  #13  
chrisc
5th Gear Member
 
chrisc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,696
Default RE: xcharger vs stg 2 ss s/c cobalt

I think the X will win, the Cobalts have large traction issues from a dig, and in the end, they are not THAT powerful. When I had my non-intercooled Vortech making 260rwhp and 250rwtq, I took quite a few STR4s from digs and rolls. With the H/O X making more power, and more power sooner than my old system, there should be no reason why an X shouldnt be able to take one.
chrisc is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jdphillips73
2005-2014 Mustangs
0
08-16-2015 04:34 PM
Soldier GT
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
9
08-12-2015 03:46 PM
94Cbra
Pipes, Boost & Juice
5
10-08-2004 07:00 AM
SJ Stang
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
0
07-08-2003 10:54 PM



Quick Reply: xcharger vs stg 2 ss s/c cobalt



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 AM.