T-Loc & Gears vs GT takeoff rearend?
#11
RE: T-Loc & Gears vs GT takeoff rearend?
ORIGINAL: CroDalmatinac
Detroit Tru Trac, gears and you are stronger than an 8.8 and lighter...
Detroit Tru Trac, gears and you are stronger than an 8.8 and lighter...
#13
RE: T-Loc & Gears vs GT takeoff rearend?
ORIGINAL: DylanFan
And where would be a good place to buy the gears and t-loc for the stock rearend?
Thanks
And where would be a good place to buy the gears and t-loc for the stock rearend?
Thanks
Diversified Marketing
http://newtakeoff.com/index.asp?Page...p;Category=424
#14
RE: T-Loc & Gears vs GT takeoff rearend?
I went with the new take off because I wanted 3.55s and NO whine. It was pretty easy to exchange rears and It only hurt gas mileage about 1-1.5 MPG on the highway. Ford Gears and t-lock plus the installation cost would be pretty close to $800.00 anyway so the take off rear made sense. I also think the weight difference is not thatbig a deal. The car runs very strong too. When I ran the car at the drags last month it ran faster then I expected! I glad I took this way instead of gears and t-lock.
#15
RE: T-Loc & Gears vs GT takeoff rearend?
ORIGINAL: danbevsv6rumbler
Very true. But the average driver usually doesn't need something that strong, and for someone who doesn't know what to expect the locker system would probably be a bad idea on the streets. On the strip... well hands down I'd take the detroit. But for practicality, and for flexibility, the t-lok seems to be able to deliver towards a lot of applications.
ORIGINAL: CroDalmatinac
Detroit Tru Trac, gears and you are stronger than an 8.8 and lighter...
Detroit Tru Trac, gears and you are stronger than an 8.8 and lighter...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KingRando
2005-2014 Mustangs
5
10-02-2015 08:06 AM
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
09-28-2015 10:53 AM