Turbo vs. Super
#11
RE: Turbo vs. Super
I had the same dilemna. For one, the X-Charger sounds a hell ofa lot meaner and intimidating. It also gives a hell of a power boost early on and mid-range.
At the X-Charger's price, its the most HP for the buck.
At the X-Charger's price, its the most HP for the buck.
#12
RE: Turbo vs. Super
ORIGINAL: ptkthekid
I love turbos, I've had a couple. But that X looks so easy to install. The best part is NO EXHAUST WORK!!! That exhaust workon turbos is a B***H!!
I love turbos, I've had a couple. But that X looks so easy to install. The best part is NO EXHAUST WORK!!! That exhaust workon turbos is a B***H!!
less than 9 hours to install mine and i took my sweet *** time.
ORIGINAL: Maverickaf17
At the X-Charger's price, its the most HP for the buck.
At the X-Charger's price, its the most HP for the buck.
300rwhp, call it 100rwhp for 4000, thats $40/hp
410rwhp, call it 210rwhp for 5000 (even though i didnt pay that much) thats $23/hp
#14
RE: Turbo vs. Super
and it begins....AGAIN. just when i think i have the right blower to purchase, another debate pops up lol. so far i only have inputs from fazm and buckman regarding turbos. now mine is a daily driver, and the info i got from fazm is that he gets 410rwhp on his stock engine no prob. would i have to forge my engine to make those gains? now on to the supercharger debate. i see that the x-plorer is getting alot of praise, but its gains put it on par with a stock GT. the procharger has more hp output, but seen that a couple of people have had complaints. how about the vortech? what's the info on that? i was set on the powerhouse turbo but now....my head is spinning lol.
#15
RE: Turbo vs. Super
I know how you feel Mr. Bape theres so many choices i chose these two to compare because the sts has its own debate and seemed like a quality product and a nice hp gain, the x-charger seems easy to install and again a substantial upgrade to horsepower and torque without a huge hit on the reliability.So its a difficult choice but i have my decision narrowed down to these two unless someone says something that amazes me about the vortech lol.
#19
RE: Turbo vs. Super
ORIGINAL: Mr.Bape
and it begins....AGAIN. just when i think i have the right blower to purchase, another debate pops up lol. so far i only have inputs from fazm and buckman regarding turbos. now mine is a daily driver, and the info i got from fazm is that he gets 410rwhp on his stock engine no prob. would i have to forge my engine to make those gains? now on to the supercharger debate. i see that the x-plorer is getting alot of praise, but its gains put it on par with a stock GT. the procharger has more hp output, but seen that a couple of people have had complaints. how about the vortech? what's the info on that? i was set on the powerhouse turbo but now....my head is spinning lol.
and it begins....AGAIN. just when i think i have the right blower to purchase, another debate pops up lol. so far i only have inputs from fazm and buckman regarding turbos. now mine is a daily driver, and the info i got from fazm is that he gets 410rwhp on his stock engine no prob. would i have to forge my engine to make those gains? now on to the supercharger debate. i see that the x-plorer is getting alot of praise, but its gains put it on par with a stock GT. the procharger has more hp output, but seen that a couple of people have had complaints. how about the vortech? what's the info on that? i was set on the powerhouse turbo but now....my head is spinning lol.
turbos are more eficient hands down, but once the X comes out with the IC, it wont be too far behind either centri's or turbos. All that will ned to be develpoed is new tuning for higher boost, and lower temps.