Notices
V6 S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V6 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

Miles Per A Tank! Yes Another Thread

Old 11-30-2009, 06:18 PM
  #51  
6+6 Stang
5th Gear Member
 
6+6 Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Livin in NC, from Michigan...Yooper
Posts: 2,008
Default

Ok got it sorry
6+6 Stang is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 08:50 AM
  #52  
4.0 $tang
2nd Gear Member
 
4.0 $tang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 281
Default

that is very exciting....anyone wanna buy my car?....lol...im serious 15k...i have 31k miles
4.0 $tang is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 08:57 AM
  #53  
kn0x`
2nd Gear Member
 
kn0x`'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 158
Default

Originally Posted by staggolee
First of all, pretty sure your GT owner friend is either full of sh*t or just confused. I've seen a V6's that claim 400+ miles a tank but thats with an economic tune and aluminum driveshafts. There may be other factors too. The on dash isn't all that accurate all the time, your best results will be by paying attention to your odometer and how much gas you have to put in at fill up and doing some division. That being said, I average about 320 miles to the tank. Only mods are K&N CAI and dual exhaust with GT mufflers. I have a 25 mile freeway commute four days a week, but two of those days are in heavy traffic one way so those 50 miles a week aren't really "highway driving". I drive an average amount on the streets, though suburban streets are more forgiving than metropolitan streets when it comes to this stuff
Just a stupid question...how does the aluminum driveshaft affect your mpgs?
kn0x` is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 09:15 AM
  #54  
Nuke
6th Gear Member
 
Nuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PA to KY ('07) to IL ('09) to MS ('10) to FL ('11)
Posts: 16,182
Default

Originally Posted by kn0x`
Just a stupid question...how does the aluminum driveshaft affect your mpgs?
An aluminum DS will reduce some of the parasitic loss in the drivetrain and frees-up a few RWHP. By increasing the efficiency of getting the power from the crank to the wheels, you're increasing overall efficiency w/o the engine working any harder.

Last edited by Nuke; 12-01-2009 at 09:19 AM.
Nuke is offline  
Old 12-02-2009, 05:44 AM
  #55  
TPLSTNG
1st Gear Member
 
TPLSTNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: IL
Posts: 149
Default

more power, better mileage....not bad.
TPLSTNG is offline  
Old 12-03-2009, 12:28 AM
  #56  
staggolee
4th Gear Member
 
staggolee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 1,579
Default

^Makes the car just feel smoother too, from what I hear
staggolee is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Granatelli Sales
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
22
01-20-2020 12:34 AM
9550
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
10
10-26-2015 05:01 PM
TfcCDR
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
1
09-14-2015 12:08 PM
zachary1988
4.6L General Discussion
5
09-04-2015 03:04 PM
raleigh05GTO
New Member Area
5
09-04-2015 07:09 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Miles Per A Tank! Yes Another Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:22 AM.