Cold air intake/ fuel consumption - MustangForums.com



V6 S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V6 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-23-2016, 03:06 AM   #1  
Erny Hernandez
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3
Default Cold air intake/ fuel consumption

OK this is very strange! 7 years ago I bought and 07 Mustang v6, one of the first mods I did was install a k&N cold air intake that doesn't require a tune which I've had ever since keeping it clean and every time I went for my maintenance for life, and I never paid attention until late recently, my car was suffering from poor acceleration and very bad fuel consumption I would get if I was lucky 175 miles a full tank city 190 if did highway, which seemed odd to me I tried checking everything so find out why was I losing acceleration and getting very bad gas milage I did ful fuel injection cleaning service and still no luck 2 weeks ago I was cleaning out the garage and I found my stock intake, so I was like what the hell I'll let me try test a theory, so I went over to ford and picked up a filter and went home and install my stock intake back on, and after a few days I gained back my acceleration, my car feel faster, and now I'm getting 240 miles on a full tank of gas, what the hell I am so confused I thought It should be the other way around. I have no idea why? could someone help me out ? I find it strange
Erny Hernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 06:09 AM   #2  
jz78817
4th Gear Member
 
jz78817's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,329
Default

Probably because your "no tune required" CAI actually needed a tune. Nevermind that it was a waste of money on a poor-breathing engine like the 4.0 anyway.
jz78817 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 07:06 AM   #3  
TRamsdell
IN JAIL!
 
TRamsdell's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Ny
Posts: 360
Default

air intake on a 4.0? may as well buy a turbonator
TRamsdell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2016, 11:25 AM   #4  
66and06stangs
2nd Gear Member
 
66and06stangs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 232
Default

"A poor breathing engine like the 4.0"? Never heard that before, but agree, it probably needed a tune. BTW, I get just over 300 miles on a tank consistently.
66and06stangs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2016, 03:01 AM   #5  
jz78817
4th Gear Member
 
jz78817's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 66and06stangs View Post
"A poor breathing engine like the 4.0"? Never heard that before, but agree, it probably needed a tune. BTW, I get just over 300 miles on a tank consistently.
the 4.0 is a truck engine, originally meant for the Explorer and Ranger. It was dropped into the Mustang because they had no other V6 to use at the time. it's a low-revving, wheezy boat anchor.
jz78817 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2016, 08:31 AM   #6  
jwog666
5th Gear Member
 
jwog666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 2,260
Default

^^^^^true story
jwog666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2016, 01:08 PM   #7  
zworld
1st Gear Member
 
zworld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: kansas
Posts: 114
Default

Well what a bunch of biased v8 owners!
zworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2016, 12:45 PM   #8  
jwog666
5th Gear Member
 
jwog666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 2,260
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zworld View Post
Well what a bunch of biased v8 owners!
BASE ENGINE SIZE 4.0 L BASE ENGINE TYPE Gas
CAM TYPE Single overhead cam (SOHC) CYLINDERS V6
HORSEPOWER 210 hp @ 5300 rpm TORQUE 240 ft-lbs. @ 3500 rpm
TURNING CIRCLE 33.4 ft.

4.6L SOHC V-8 = 300 hp @ 5750 RPM & 320 lb-ft @ 4500 RPM.

not that great. not bias, facts.
jwog666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2016, 02:27 AM   #9  
07MRMIKE
 
07MRMIKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: VERMONT
Posts: 27
Default

the v6 of today makes the same hp and tq as your 03 v8 so i guess todays v6 owners should throw your turd v8 under the bus just the same,, not bias just facts....


M
07MRMIKE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2016, 07:28 AM   #10  
66and06stangs
2nd Gear Member
 
66and06stangs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 232
Default

Really... if you don't have anything good to say, why not hang out with the other cool kids in the V8 forum. Personally, my nicely tuned v6 suits me just fine.
66and06stangs is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Advertising
Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 PM.


© 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.