Me vs SRT-4
#21
RE: Me vs SRT-4
ORIGINAL: GT05
This is what I know:
It's all about Power to Weight ratio. And the V6 is heavy and slow. It traps at 92mph in the 1/4. What's that?!
This was at the track about 3 months ago.
In my 2000 Honda Accord V6 (Auto) - traps at 102mph
I beat an SRT4 by about 5ft. It was very close.
Then I beat a V6 mustang by about a length and a half.
So yeah, the SRT4 would beat your pusstang.
Bottom line: your mustang wasn't built for performance. It was built for the bling factor.
P.S. - If you slant your headlight supports 20 degrees, you'll look like a Shelby.
[IMG]local://upfiles/25008/E58FC0DC1DC644D2BBF578423E686AA5.jpg[/IMG]
This is what I know:
It's all about Power to Weight ratio. And the V6 is heavy and slow. It traps at 92mph in the 1/4. What's that?!
This was at the track about 3 months ago.
In my 2000 Honda Accord V6 (Auto) - traps at 102mph
I beat an SRT4 by about 5ft. It was very close.
Then I beat a V6 mustang by about a length and a half.
So yeah, the SRT4 would beat your pusstang.
Bottom line: your mustang wasn't built for performance. It was built for the bling factor.
P.S. - If you slant your headlight supports 20 degrees, you'll look like a Shelby.
[IMG]local://upfiles/25008/E58FC0DC1DC644D2BBF578423E686AA5.jpg[/IMG]
childish *******
#22
RE: Me vs SRT-4
ORIGINAL: LesteR723
why do you have to bash on the 6ers...? what a ***. Did thay make your ***** self esteem feel better? ****ing like a 3rd grade bully-
childish *******
ORIGINAL: GT05
This is what I know:
It's all about Power to Weight ratio. And the V6 is heavy and slow. It traps at 92mph in the 1/4. What's that?!
This was at the track about 3 months ago.
In my 2000 Honda Accord V6 (Auto) - traps at 102mph
I beat an SRT4 by about 5ft. It was very close.
Then I beat a V6 mustang by about a length and a half.
So yeah, the SRT4 would beat your pusstang.
Bottom line: your mustang wasn't built for performance. It was built for the bling factor.
P.S. - If you slant your headlight supports 20 degrees, you'll look like a Shelby.
[IMG]local://upfiles/25008/E58FC0DC1DC644D2BBF578423E686AA5.jpg[/IMG]
This is what I know:
It's all about Power to Weight ratio. And the V6 is heavy and slow. It traps at 92mph in the 1/4. What's that?!
This was at the track about 3 months ago.
In my 2000 Honda Accord V6 (Auto) - traps at 102mph
I beat an SRT4 by about 5ft. It was very close.
Then I beat a V6 mustang by about a length and a half.
So yeah, the SRT4 would beat your pusstang.
Bottom line: your mustang wasn't built for performance. It was built for the bling factor.
P.S. - If you slant your headlight supports 20 degrees, you'll look like a Shelby.
[IMG]local://upfiles/25008/E58FC0DC1DC644D2BBF578423E686AA5.jpg[/IMG]
childish *******
#24
RE: Me vs SRT-4
ORIGINAL: GT05
This is what I know:
It's all about Power to Weight ratio. And the V6 is heavy and slow. It traps at 92mph in the 1/4. What's that?!
This was at the track about 3 months ago.
In my 2000 Honda Accord V6 (Auto) - traps at 102mph
I beat an SRT4 by about 5ft. It was very close.
Then I beat a V6 mustang by about a length and a half.
So yeah, the SRT4 would beat your pusstang.
Bottom line: your mustang wasn't built for performance. It was built for the bling factor.
P.S. - If you slant your headlight supports 20 degrees, you'll look like a Shelby.
[IMG]local://upfiles/25008/E58FC0DC1DC644D2BBF578423E686AA5.jpg[/IMG]
This is what I know:
It's all about Power to Weight ratio. And the V6 is heavy and slow. It traps at 92mph in the 1/4. What's that?!
This was at the track about 3 months ago.
In my 2000 Honda Accord V6 (Auto) - traps at 102mph
I beat an SRT4 by about 5ft. It was very close.
Then I beat a V6 mustang by about a length and a half.
So yeah, the SRT4 would beat your pusstang.
Bottom line: your mustang wasn't built for performance. It was built for the bling factor.
P.S. - If you slant your headlight supports 20 degrees, you'll look like a Shelby.
[IMG]local://upfiles/25008/E58FC0DC1DC644D2BBF578423E686AA5.jpg[/IMG]
...i mean only people who are insecure bash...
look at the guys running the power on the forum, you ever seen them bashing on a 6er?
you wanna bash, take it somewhere else
#25
RE: Me vs SRT-4
ORIGINAL: chrisc
i think you got your man-hood confused with your stick shift there buddy
...i mean only people who are insecure bash...
look at the guys running the power on the forum, you ever seen them bashing on a 6er?
you wanna bash, take it somewhere else
ORIGINAL: GT05
This is what I know:
It's all about Power to Weight ratio. And the V6 is heavy and slow. It traps at 92mph in the 1/4. What's that?!
This was at the track about 3 months ago.
In my 2000 Honda Accord V6 (Auto) - traps at 102mph
I beat an SRT4 by about 5ft. It was very close.
Then I beat a V6 mustang by about a length and a half.
So yeah, the SRT4 would beat your pusstang.
Bottom line: your mustang wasn't built for performance. It was built for the bling factor.
P.S. - If you slant your headlight supports 20 degrees, you'll look like a Shelby.
[IMG]local://upfiles/25008/E58FC0DC1DC644D2BBF578423E686AA5.jpg[/IMG]
This is what I know:
It's all about Power to Weight ratio. And the V6 is heavy and slow. It traps at 92mph in the 1/4. What's that?!
This was at the track about 3 months ago.
In my 2000 Honda Accord V6 (Auto) - traps at 102mph
I beat an SRT4 by about 5ft. It was very close.
Then I beat a V6 mustang by about a length and a half.
So yeah, the SRT4 would beat your pusstang.
Bottom line: your mustang wasn't built for performance. It was built for the bling factor.
P.S. - If you slant your headlight supports 20 degrees, you'll look like a Shelby.
[IMG]local://upfiles/25008/E58FC0DC1DC644D2BBF578423E686AA5.jpg[/IMG]
...i mean only people who are insecure bash...
look at the guys running the power on the forum, you ever seen them bashing on a 6er?
you wanna bash, take it somewhere else
#27
RE: Me vs SRT-4
that neon is pumping out 230 hp @ 250lb -ft of torque 0 to 60 in under 6 seconds
hes gonna beat u like the guy early on said u need either juice or a head start and u need to know how to keep him behind u, u know not giving him passing room or your done
hes gonna beat u like the guy early on said u need either juice or a head start and u need to know how to keep him behind u, u know not giving him passing room or your done
#28
RE: Me vs SRT-4
ORIGINAL: JMAL
that neon is pumping out 230 hp @ 250lb -ft of torque 0 to 60 in under 6 seconds
hes gonna beat u like the guy early on said u need either juice or a head start and u need to know how to keep him behind u, u know not giving him passing room or your done
that neon is pumping out 230 hp @ 250lb -ft of torque 0 to 60 in under 6 seconds
hes gonna beat u like the guy early on said u need either juice or a head start and u need to know how to keep him behind u, u know not giving him passing room or your done
#29
RE: Me vs SRT-4
I've raced my buddies 2003 SRT-4. From a dig thru 2nd gear it was not even close. I had 2 lengths on him, however at about 4 grand in 3rd my little v6 was callinfg for air and he was spooled up. Don't like going to fast on the street, he definitely would have me in the quarter and on top.
#30
RE: Me vs SRT-4
ORIGINAL: HAAS05
I've raced my buddies 2003 SRT-4. From a dig thru 2nd gear it was not even close. I had 2 lengths on him, however at about 4 grand in 3rd my little v6 was callinfg for air and he was spooled up. Don't like going to fast on the street, he definitely would have me in the quarter and on top.
I've raced my buddies 2003 SRT-4. From a dig thru 2nd gear it was not even close. I had 2 lengths on him, however at about 4 grand in 3rd my little v6 was callinfg for air and he was spooled up. Don't like going to fast on the street, he definitely would have me in the quarter and on top.