Where the 2011 5.0 ranks in the history of mustangs?? - Page 2 - MustangForums.com

Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 2005-2014 Mustangs

2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by XForce USA

Where the 2011 5.0 ranks in the history of mustangs??

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-07-2010, 11:20 AM   #11
4th Gear Member
Roy_R's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Vehicle: 2008 Mustang GT
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,477

If Ford brings out a 05-09 with engine upgrades to the 5.0, it will be the best Mustang ever....
Life is a matter of risk and the chances of
success are in no way enhanced by extreme caution...
Roy_R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 11:28 AM   #12
1st Gear Member
KXRM's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2009
Vehicle: 2011 Mustang GT
Location: Texas
Posts: 142

Well I am going to be the first to admit that when the 2010 came out I was NOT a fan of the rear. It just looked wrong to me. However, the profile and front end I think far exceed the styling of my '06. Add to that the upgraded interior which I think greatly improves upon the '05-'09 style. I am starting to forget how ugly I find the rear end to be. Now that the '11 has come out with the 302. What rear end? It certainly captures everything I love about mustang over the generations. The first generation is hard to beat though. So I doubt it will ever be the best in history.
KXRM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 12:27 PM   #13
4th Gear Member
wayne613's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2010
Vehicle: 2008, GT/CS
Location: Gallifrey
Posts: 1,596

Originally Posted by RideMyAssOff View Post
If Ford brings out a 05-09 with engine upgrades to the 5.0, it will be the best Mustang ever....

But I will admit like the last poster, the engine upgrade outweighs the dislike I personally have for the back-end redesign.

If anyone´s willing for fork over the $35k for me I´ll gladly keep/buy one for 30 years to find out for ya if it´ll stand the test of time.
4.10s, 285rwhp/297rwtq - SCT, "we suck so you don't have to"
¨Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
¨--Ben Franklin
wayne613 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 05:00 PM   #14
4th Gear Member
Snakebite64's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2010
Vehicle: 1978 AMC Pacer
Location: dark side of the moon
Posts: 1,530

I kinda like mine or any 60's fastback
Good morning Vietnam I am a Jolly green giant in the land of the little people
2009 GT500
#2897 of 3004 hardtops
1 of 842 ebony hardtops
1 of 85 stripe delete hardtops

Your friendly admin for a great little site north of the border
Snakebite64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 05:06 PM   #15
5th Gear Member
SXGT's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ky
Posts: 2,992
Send a message via AIM to SXGT Send a message via MSN to SXGT

1. Cobra R
2. New 5.0
3. Terminator Cobra
4. 2003 Mach 1
Zoom zoom
SXGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 05:33 PM   #16
4th Gear Member
Adam's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Vehicle: '68 GT Fastback, '10 Premium GT
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,163

I think the 2014 redesign will be the one to have. If they use a direct injected 5.0 and make the car a little smaller (and weigh less) it would be perfect IMO.
Adam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 05:41 PM   #17
5th Gear Member
808muscle's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2009
Vehicle: 2006 Mustang GT
Location: Maui
Posts: 4,736

With 400 plus HP, it really doesn't matter now does it? Lol
Styling wise, not as big a winner as when the 05s came out. Imo, its power is its best feature. I would certainly own one but don't need it with what I already have. Ill keep my blown 06.
808muscle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 08:47 PM   #18
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Vehicle: 1991 GT convertible, 2011 Kona Blue GT
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 69

I have owned 6 or 7 various year mustangs. Starting with a 92 notchback 5.0. A few 99-03. A 2003 terminator. 2004 40th anniversary convertible. I currently own a 91 GT convertible and a 2011 GT. I have had the new GT for about 4 mos. I really like the Foxes, but the more I drive the new one; the more it grows on me. The only other car that I have owned that is/ was comparable would be the cobra. It was pretty quick, although I think the new one would run neck to neck with it. I think the old school ones -60's will always be king, after all they are the ones that started it all. New GT won't replace the old ones, just outrun them in stock to stock form. Won't touch them on styling though!
Stockstangs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 08:53 PM   #19
3rd Gear Member
65Raven65's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Vehicle: 1987 GT
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 741

Originally Posted by 06mach1 View Post
I would think the 5.0 has got to be a blast to drive compared to my 4.6. I have not been a big fan of the change in body style though compared to S197. I have a real hard time liking the rear of the vehicle. My veiw is going to have to change soon though as I have a 2012 ordered.

I've seen this before, and I'm curious. Why would you spend $30K+ on a car that you dont like the looks of? I seriously want to understand the logic. I've read other members here that say the same thing. Makes no sense, IMO.

As to the original post and question, I've owned 6 Mustangs and while I dont own a 2011, my 2010 is the quickest (stock for stock) I've owned. (my '89 was faster, but it was heavily modded) Not to mention nicest driving, handling, most comfortable, and best made.

I think Ford hit a home run with the 2010+. Cant wait to see what they do in 2014.

1987 T-Top GT, 5-speed manual, 3.08

Last edited by 65Raven65; 12-07-2010 at 08:55 PM.
65Raven65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 09:10 PM   #20
2nd Gear Member
RichieCal's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2010
Vehicle: 06 Ford Mustang
Location: NYC
Posts: 164

Originally Posted by Blacksmoke View Post
It has an great build that's for sure.
Where it ranks? Time will tell.

I'm one of those guys though that think the new body style will not rank
very high though as far as looks. (Not that I don't think it looks good)
I think the first gen S197's 2005-2009 capture the retro look much better and
just plain look better.

That is my opinion though but it seems that MANY agree with that statement.

So far though the new 5.0 has been the **** though when it comes
to performance reviews. We will see though as time goes on.
I couldn't have said it better
RichieCal is offline   Reply With Quote


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Horsepower History: Mustang Power Numbers Through the Years MustangForums Editor Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion 8 01-06-2016 07:03 PM
Max RWHP on Stock 5.0 Engine? 05slpGT The New S550 2015-2016 Mustang 4 08-12-2015 02:32 PM
Just swapped motor exhaust want fit daytooday Motor Swap Section 2 08-11-2015 09:22 AM
*First Post* Mustang V6 Exaust Recommendations NothingSpecial New Member Area 6 08-11-2015 07:00 AM
exhaust leak at Crossover? 11GTBlu 5.0L V8 Technical Discussions 2 08-10-2015 05:56 PM

2011, 50, 80s, 90s, autozone, fake, ford, history, hood, hoodscoop, mustang, mustangs, racing, ranks, review, scoop, supercharger

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 AM.

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company