Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

My old man claims this......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2011, 12:37 AM
  #41  
Cusp
2nd Gear Member
 
Cusp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Posts: 277
Default

Originally Posted by bakerjd
Wow, a "progressive geezer". You don't put those two words together too often! haha
Because he has learned to vote to have the goods and services he either can't or does not want to pay for himself.
Cusp is offline  
Old 05-29-2011, 12:50 AM
  #42  
Cusp
2nd Gear Member
 
Cusp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Posts: 277
Default

Originally Posted by chidrock

Also, thanks to modern suspensions I can go 80 without realizing it in my car. I can ony imagine what it felt like to go that fast in those older cars. I remember my moms boats from the late 70's and how crazy they felt when I would get them up to highway speeds.

It really comes down to perception...
You comment reminded me of my 68 Chevell..... Over 90 and it would start to feel light on the wheels. Slowly rocking and pitching. Could have been bad shocks. Made me keep it at 75 or under for fear of bad things happening. I had a 73 dodge cornet which would vibrate at about 80.... No speed related issues to report with this mustang. Smooth and stable as 60 at all experienced speeds. Well the hood seems to want to test the latch at the higher end or in gusty high winds. But the latch has held.
Cusp is offline  
Old 05-29-2011, 07:31 AM
  #43  
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
pascal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 13,373
Default

Originally Posted by mobydick
The fastest Production (Not Counting Shelbys and limited runs) Mustang made before 2007 Model year GT500 was a 71 Boss 351 only 1806 were made, 1/4 mile E/T was 13.8. With a good driver it would run that off the truck.
The 2000 Cobra R broke that streak but I guess it could be counted as a limited run since it was a streetable race car basically with no A/C etc...
pascal is offline  
Old 05-31-2011, 10:53 AM
  #44  
07 Cervini
2nd Gear Member
 
07 Cervini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 255
Default

Have your old man read this article, I found it pretty interesting:

http://www.motortrend.com/features/p...new/index.html
07 Cervini is offline  
Old 05-31-2011, 11:02 AM
  #45  
outceltj
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
outceltj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: IN
Posts: 2,248
Default

thanks man
outceltj is offline  
Old 05-31-2011, 11:22 AM
  #46  
Nuke
6th Gear Member
 
Nuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PA to KY ('07) to IL ('09) to MS ('10) to FL ('11)
Posts: 16,182
Default

I grew up with the muscle cars of the 60's and 70's and I can honestly say that the memories of the large displacement engines, the louder exhausts and the tires laying down hundreds of miles worth of rubber with each run are used in comparison to todays cars. I think todays engines rev so much smoother and the tire compounds so much stickier that it's easy to dismiss todays cars as quicker. Imagine 2 identical vehicles running identical low 12's except one has a whisper quiet exhaust. In a poll, the louder car would win hands-down. Hence the placebo effect.
Nuke is offline  
Old 05-31-2011, 12:29 PM
  #47  
jwharton
2nd Gear Member
 
jwharton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: KS
Posts: 260
Default

Part of it is the fact that we want to remember it as the best time with the best cars, best girls and certainly the best octane, cheapest leaded gas to put in those cars. I like many would love to go back and re-live those times, experience some of my youth over again just like it happened and change a few things I screwed up. Those were "the good ole days" because they were the days of my youth....and we had really cool cars fast or not...LOL.
jwharton is offline  
Old 05-31-2011, 12:52 PM
  #48  
Planeswalker
 
Planeswalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 22
Default

Love the classics but...better tires, brakes, supensions, and way more efficient engines is the way to go. Overall todays cars are faster and by far safer.
Planeswalker is offline  
Old 05-31-2011, 01:39 PM
  #49  
Pete_Rockett
2nd Gear Member
 
Pete_Rockett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 195
Default

My first new car out of college was a 1969 Plymouth Roadrunner, hemi. My 2012 Mustang is FAR quicker than the Roadrunner (showroom vs. showroom). Zero-60 of 6 seconds was hot stuff back then, and pulling one horsepower per cubic inch was phenomenal.
Pete_Rockett is offline  
Old 05-31-2011, 02:08 PM
  #50  
highline
4th Gear Member
 
highline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,482
Default

Originally Posted by Pete_Rockett
pulling one horsepower per cubic inch was phenomenal.
yes it was...lol
highline is offline  


Quick Reply: My old man claims this......



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 AM.