Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Which is more economical?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2012, 10:55 AM
  #31  
Knechtion
1st Gear Member
 
Knechtion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: OHIO
Posts: 65
Default

idk if you have looked into edelbrock E-force supercharger... it has your horsepower range, no whine, and has a intercooler. Just a suggestion
Knechtion is offline  
Old 05-11-2012, 11:47 AM
  #32  
ZPounds07GT
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
ZPounds07GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 796
Default

Originally Posted by Knechtion
idk if you have looked into edelbrock E-force supercharger... it has your horsepower range, no whine, and has a intercooler. Just a suggestion
It looks like a great product but it is just over $6,500. That much money for that much power plus the time to save up for that much is not justifiable to me. If I had the means to reduce the time to save, it might be possible. It is a good looking supercharger though.
ZPounds07GT is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tims 88 4
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
3
12-16-2006 01:57 AM
tims 88 4
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
2
12-15-2006 11:19 PM



Quick Reply: Which is more economical?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 AM.