Search



Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 2005 - 2014 Mustangs
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search

2005 - 2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by Latemodel Restoration


Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-26-2014, 02:48 PM   #1
yourmyboybh1026
3rd Gear Member
 
yourmyboybh1026's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Vehicle: 2009 Mustang GT
Location: Clearwater FL
Posts: 582
Default This is talked to death, I know, but Eforce or Roush?

I just want to get people's opinions on the two. I've done a lot of research and asked Brenspeed quite a few questions (I emailed VMP also but never heard back). I have decided to go with a TVS style blower. I looked into the other styles such as a Kenne Bell, but pound for pound the TVS is better under 16lbs of boost. After that the KB starts to become more efficient than the 2.3L TVS but I won't get to those levels anytime soon.

So here are all the features I like about the two models. I just need to figure out which ones are more important to me.

Eforce stage 1 from Brenspeed

-Easier to install than the Roush (according to Brenspeed)
-110 sqin intercooler
-bypass valve for better gas mileage (this is my DD)
-slightly more lower end torque because of longer runners

Roush 560r package from Brenspeed

-gt500 TB
-52lb hr injectors (eforce comes with 41 which would need to be upgraded later -if I wanted more power)
-better intercooler pump
-lower IATs than the eforce (according to Brenspeed)
-cheaper than eforce


Eventually, years down the road, when this isn't a DD I'd like to upgrade to something like the b326 and run a ton of power. Both are capable of the power I'd like. The big plus with the Roush is there is less to upgrade down the line. With the eforce I get the bypass valve which might be nice for me since this is my DD.

Thoughts, comments?
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
2009 GT 5sp, Stainless Works long tube headers, Koni yellows, steeda ultralight springs, steeda UCA/LCA, airaid intake, FRPP axle back, BAMA tuned, Dynotech DS, Godspeed wheels, GT500 Spoiler, CDC Classic Chin Spoiler, AM Window Louvers, Agent 47 Mirrors
yourmyboybh1026 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2014, 03:24 PM   #2
CutterWolf
5th Gear Member
 
CutterWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Vehicle: 2006 GT/SS
Location: Brandon, Florida
Posts: 2,615
Default

Depends on what you want a Super charger to do for "you". If you wanting to run big power down the line I would tell you to look into a Centi or Turbo since you get way more power bang for your buck with those systems plus, they let you hook up first before dumping all the power to the ground like a root system does. Again it comes down to, "what do you want it for?"
__________________

'2011 Mustang Forum Ride of the Year"

My 5.0 Mag feature: http://www.mustang50magazine.com/fea...model_citizen/
CarDomain page: http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3382054
Vossen Wheels: http://www.vossenwheels.com/
Trufiber: http://www.trufiber.com/
CutterWolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2014, 12:12 AM   #3
808muscle
5th Gear Member
 
808muscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Vehicle: 2006 Mustang GT
Location: Maui
Posts: 4,499
Default

Both are winners, your gonna love either one. My vote is for the Roush but forget me, get what you like.
__________________


06 Satin Silver GT - Auto...ROUSH M90 CAI, Afco Dual Fan HE, 4.10s,Truetrac, Detroit Rockers, DSS DS, TCI Rachet Shifter, PA Deep Pan, Eibach Handling, FR P Springs, Strange Shocks/Struts, J&M UCA/LCA, SS Lines/ EBC Slotted/Dimpled Rotors w/Reds, Mickey Thompson SC5, Nitto 255/305, 2011 leather, Pypes LT's/H-Pipe, MBRP Resonators, Borla

2011 NHRA Sportsman Class Hawaii State Champion
12.23 @ 113 mph
808muscle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2014, 12:57 AM   #4
UPRSharad
Sponsor
 
UPRSharad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Vehicle: 2011, Ford, Mustang GT
Location: FL
Posts: 2,326
www.facebook.com/sraldiris
Default

We're running the Roush TVS with great success on UPR's 2010 GT (9.90 in the quarter mile, full weight street car) but I'm a big fan of the VMP TVS. We'll probably start carrying them soon.
__________________

Like us at www.facebook.com/TeamUPR
Follow us on Instagram @uprproducts
UPRSharad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2014, 03:18 PM   #5
AKRA
1st Gear Member

 
AKRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Vehicle: 2012, Ford, Mustang GT
Location: Michigan
Posts: 100
Default

I vote Roush. Not only because I have one but they put them on production car every day and they last long enough to cover the 3 year 36000 warranty. It is a proven design that I have heard very few complaints about.

I believe the designer for the Edelbrock came from and designed saleen's Supercharger. The saleen supercharger I used to have had on my 2007 had issues burning though belts and belts slipping. A belt only lasted 4 to 6 weeks.

I have had the roush on my 2012 for 1.5 years without any issues.

Best of luck.
__________________
2012 Mustang GT:
Grabber Blue, Black stripes, Glass Top, Chrome AMR Wheels, MT82 Transmission, Roush Stage 3 Supercharger, 3.73 gears, 42 lb Injectors, Hurst shifter and Bassani Exhaust.
AKRA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2014, 06:31 AM   #6
yourmyboybh1026
3rd Gear Member
 
yourmyboybh1026's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Vehicle: 2009 Mustang GT
Location: Clearwater FL
Posts: 582
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AKRA View Post
I vote Roush. Not only because I have one but they put them on production car every day and they last long enough to cover the 3 year 36000 warranty. It is a proven design that I have heard very few complaints about.

I believe the designer for the Edelbrock came from and designed saleen's Supercharger. The saleen supercharger I used to have had on my 2007 had issues burning though belts and belts slipping. A belt only lasted 4 to 6 weeks.

I have had the roush on my 2012 for 1.5 years without any issues.

Best of luck.
I may have to look into that. I haven't heard of any problems with the eforce but maybe I didn't look hard enough. I've heard of belts slipping and shredding with the whiple supercharger sometimes. Has anyone else heard of problems with the eforce?
yourmyboybh1026 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2014, 08:30 AM   #7
B's 5.0
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Vehicle: 2013 Roush Replica
Location: Somewhere USA
Posts: 361
Default

That's a tough one for me. ROUSH.
B's 5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2014, 05:18 PM   #8
yourmyboybh1026
3rd Gear Member
 
yourmyboybh1026's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Vehicle: 2009 Mustang GT
Location: Clearwater FL
Posts: 582
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by B's 5.0 View Post
That's a tough one for me. ROUSH.
lol you do seem to have a Roush addiction.
__________________
2009 GT 5sp, Stainless Works long tube headers, Koni yellows, steeda ultralight springs, steeda UCA/LCA, airaid intake, FRPP axle back, BAMA tuned, Dynotech DS, Godspeed wheels, GT500 Spoiler, CDC Classic Chin Spoiler, AM Window Louvers, Agent 47 Mirrors
yourmyboybh1026 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2014, 01:22 AM   #9
tx_zstang
5th Gear Member
 
tx_zstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicle: 2006 Turbo V6; 2005 V6->V8 swap beast
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,333
Default

Back to something you posted in the first thread: you want to stay under 16 psi, for now.
If you're smart, you'll plan ahead for when you might (or will) want more power. If you have a blower than can deliver more power later, you wont have to upgrade to a different setup.
__________________
Mike - 2005 Stroked/Forged/Cammed V8 (5.0L.); Kenne Bell 2.6 @ 18psi, + many mods. (formerly a V6 w/Vortech supercharger);
- 2006 4.0 V6 with PH Turbo and TR6060
tx_zstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2014, 09:38 PM   #10
slickman
5th Gear Member

 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Vehicle: 2008 Mustang GT
Location: NY
Posts: 2,630
Default

E-Force without any question. You forgot one thing, the E-Force also looks factory and cleaner then most SC out there.
slickman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2014, 09:38 PM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup