4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

how to test a maf

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-11-2009, 04:51 PM
  #1  
HateWhatOwnsYou
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
HateWhatOwnsYou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: ohio
Posts: 408
Default how to test a maf

how do i test it to find out if its good? car runs fine, just guzzles up gas

i have a a CEL: banks 1 & 2 are rich.


this is on my 00 crown vic
HateWhatOwnsYou is offline  
Old 09-11-2009, 06:01 PM
  #2  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

What are the exact codes?

There are 5 or 6 codes for each bank that have "rich" in the description--they all indicate different problems...
cliffyk is offline  
Old 09-11-2009, 10:56 PM
  #3  
HateWhatOwnsYou
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
HateWhatOwnsYou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: ohio
Posts: 408
Default

i didnt get the codes, the dude at autozone said banks 1 and 2 are rich. will they tell me codes?
HateWhatOwnsYou is offline  
Old 09-12-2009, 07:45 AM
  #4  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

I don't see why not, and frankly the opinion of the "dude at autozone" as to what's wrong, based upon pulling codes with a generic scantool, is pretty much worthless.

Get the codes and look 'em up here...
cliffyk is offline  
Old 09-12-2009, 11:37 AM
  #5  
HateWhatOwnsYou
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
HateWhatOwnsYou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: ohio
Posts: 408
Default

p0102 Mass Air Flow (MAF) Circuit Low Input
p0175 System too Rich (Bank 2)
p0172 System too Rich (Bank 1)


i put seafoam in the brake booster vac line before i started driving the car, could it have done harm?

so 102 is saying the maf is messing up and the other 2 are saying the car is running rich. i pulled the maf sensor off and its clean so how do i check it?

Last edited by HateWhatOwnsYou; 09-12-2009 at 11:43 AM.
HateWhatOwnsYou is offline  
Old 09-12-2009, 07:29 PM
  #6  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by HateWhatOwnsYou
p0102 Mass Air Flow (MAF) Circuit Low Input
p0175 System too Rich (Bank 2)
p0172 System too Rich (Bank 1)


i put seafoam in the brake booster vac line before i started driving the car, could it have done harm?
There is no "brake booster vacuum line" on our cars--the Hydroboost braking system is powered by the power steering pump. What hose did you pull to inject the snake-oil?

Seafoam was developed in the 40's for use in marine engines (hence the name) that habitually ran cold and/or were otherwise poorly maintained or stored unused for extended periods (think winter, in a shed on a wharf in Maine).

It has no place being used in a modern properly maintained engine. Ford specifically states in its manuals that snake-oil intake "cleansers" and oil additives should NOT be used under any circumstances. If I owned any engine that could possibly benefit from Seafoam I'd take it apart an rebuild it...

so 102 is saying the maf is messing up and the other 2 are saying the car is running rich. i pulled the maf sensor off and its clean so how do i check it?
OK, that aside, there isn't any menaingful "out-of-vehicle" test for the MAF, the best way to test it is to backprobe the output signal--on our cars the light blue/red (+) and tan/light blue (-) wires at the MAF.

Here are the reference values from the '03 shop manual:


Depending on where the Seafoam was injected it may have contaminated the MAF as the intake air pulsed. Many have cleaned their MAF successfuly with rattle can TB cleaner.

The O2 sensors may also have been contaminated/damaged by the snake-oil, depending on how fast and how much was ingested. They may burn themselves clean after a while, you might try taking the car for a 20-25 trip on the interstate.
cliffyk is offline  
Old 09-13-2009, 01:00 AM
  #7  
HateWhatOwnsYou
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
HateWhatOwnsYou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: ohio
Posts: 408
Default

i said this is on my crown vic, it has a brake booster vac line. i did do more than the can reccomends. its actually still smoking from it(or atleast i think).

that actually might be my answer.


eff me
HateWhatOwnsYou is offline  
Old 09-13-2009, 09:08 AM
  #8  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by HateWhatOwnsYou
i said this is on my crown vic, it has a brake booster vac line. i did do more than the can reccomends. its actually still smoking from it(or atleast i think).

that actually might be my answer.


eff me
I'm sorry, I missed that--a good long cruise on the highway may blow 'em clean...
cliffyk is offline  
Old 09-13-2009, 11:03 AM
  #9  
HateWhatOwnsYou
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
HateWhatOwnsYou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: ohio
Posts: 408
Default

but seafoam wouldnt be able to cause this code tho would it?
p0102 Mass Air Flow (MAF) Circuit Low Input
HateWhatOwnsYou is offline  
Old 09-13-2009, 11:37 AM
  #10  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by HateWhatOwnsYou
but seafoam wouldnt be able to cause this code tho would it?
p0102 Mass Air Flow (MAF) Circuit Low Input

Sure it could, if it contaminated the MAF or O2 sensors, which are designed to have gasoline mist, and gasoline created exhaust gasses thrown at them--not kerosene and who knows what else...
cliffyk is offline  


Quick Reply: how to test a maf



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 AM.