4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Why did Ford replace the 5.0 to 4.6???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2011, 05:46 PM
  #21  
Rockwell28
4th Gear Member
 
Rockwell28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 1,452
Default

point well taken but the only thing they share is "5.0" it stops there its part of the mod family but that goes without saying. But if thats what makes you feel better boss then let that be your personal gospel. Th new 5.0 is a stock beast and its a total different beast than the old pushrod 5.0. not knocking them i love the sound of them but its a total dif beast design. mod/ pushrod rain/cloudy.

Last edited by Rockwell28; 05-08-2011 at 05:48 PM.
Rockwell28 is offline  
Old 05-08-2011, 06:04 PM
  #22  
PurpleIcedGT
6th Gear Member
 
PurpleIcedGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,028
Default

Rockwell what the hell are you talking about brotha?
PurpleIcedGT is offline  
Old 05-08-2011, 06:06 PM
  #23  
02GTman
3rd Gear Member
 
02GTman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 679
Default

I think Ford was trying to move in a new direction with the improved modular engine, proving it's worthiness. You have to admit, look how many New Edge's were sold.

Just my 2 cents.

Last edited by 02GTman; 05-08-2011 at 06:19 PM.
02GTman is offline  
Old 05-08-2011, 08:29 PM
  #24  
darkstarnes
2nd Gear Member
 
darkstarnes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Az
Posts: 389
Default

Push rods are just OLD.... new and better tech is out there, I don't understand why GM wants to keep using them.... that's why you can make as much or more HP with smaller disp with OHC engines....
darkstarnes is offline  
Old 05-09-2011, 12:48 AM
  #25  
Rockwell28
4th Gear Member
 
Rockwell28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 1,452
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleIcedGT
Rockwell what the hell are you talking about brotha?
that the comparison of the legendary 5.0 from back in the day stops at the badge 5.0 bc its a total diff beast than the old pushrod engine. I was responding to the post that was right above mine I think i just forgot quote then respond.
Rockwell28 is offline  
Old 05-09-2011, 01:30 AM
  #26  
H0SS302
6th Gear Member
 
H0SS302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 10,551
Default

Originally Posted by darkstarnes
Push rods are just OLD.... new and better tech is out there, I don't understand why GM wants to keep using them.... that's why you can make as much or more HP with smaller disp with OHC engines....

ROFL seriously? If it aint broke dont fix it..

Ford has been using the OHC platform for 16 years now in a mustang, and they JUST NOW turned out a motor that doesnt need a blower to keep up with that "old" technology that GM is running.

The LS motors have been kicking *** and getting excellent gas mileage doing it... they have never needed to change the recipe..and I doubt they ever will.
H0SS302 is offline  
Old 05-09-2011, 03:21 AM
  #27  
darkstarnes
2nd Gear Member
 
darkstarnes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Az
Posts: 389
Default

Originally Posted by H0SS302
ROFL seriously? If it aint broke dont fix it..

Ford has been using the OHC platform for 16 years now in a mustang, and they JUST NOW turned out a motor that doesnt need a blower to keep up with that "old" technology that GM is running.

The LS motors have been kicking *** and getting excellent gas mileage doing it... they have never needed to change the recipe..and I doubt they ever will.
Seriously.... yes LSX engines may be a great engine but it is still old and there are better ways to make more power without the need of massive disp... just look at european cars... I may be wrong but all new engines are not OHV... and they make great power with small disp engines...
darkstarnes is offline  
Old 05-09-2011, 06:13 AM
  #28  
02GTman
3rd Gear Member
 
02GTman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 679
Default

Well if GM wanted to go modular it would be easy they already have a platform......the Northstar.
02GTman is offline  
Old 05-09-2011, 08:25 AM
  #29  
turbo232
4th Gear Member
 
turbo232's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 1,232
Default

Originally Posted by 02GTman
Well if GM wanted to go modular it would be easy they already have a platform......the Northstar.
they had the LT4 DOHC in 94 but killed it because they had to retrain techs.....they killed off a great engine to be cheap.
turbo232 is offline  
Old 05-09-2011, 09:05 AM
  #30  
H0SS302
6th Gear Member
 
H0SS302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 10,551
Default

Originally Posted by darkstarnes
Seriously.... yes LSX engines may be a great engine but it is still old and there are better ways to make more power without the need of massive disp... just look at european cars... I may be wrong but all new engines are not OHV... and they make great power with small disp engines...
Again...I challenge your reasoning with this:


Who cares if its old...its been kicking the crap out of cars with "superior" technology for damn near decades.

If it aint broke, dont fix it.
H0SS302 is offline  


Quick Reply: Why did Ford replace the 5.0 to 4.6???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 PM.