The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 4 Cylinder NA and Turbo > 4 Cylinder General Discussion
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-11-2008, 08:37 AM   #11
92lxsleeper
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Vehicle: 1997 Thunderbird
Location: Lincoln, Rhode Island
Posts: 2,262
Default RE: Mark VII or Camaro

Quote:
ORIGINAL: sleeper_inc

I've seen the LSx corvettes get 30 mpg. (if you have doughts, I talk to a guy with a 442 cid LSx)
i have no doubts at all about that. i know my camaro can do better than 27. hell look at how aerodynamic the thing is.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
I'll kick your sorry arses so hard you'll kiss the moons.

1997 Ford Thunderbird LX
3.8L Essex V6
145hp 215 ft/lb torque.
92lxsleeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2008, 04:03 AM   #12
Pnkhead
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicle: 2008 Mustang GT
Location: TDC Korea
Posts: 281
Default

The new corvette gets 25/28 LS2/LS3, But...Im having a hard time beliving your v6 1993 camaro is getting that much.(hard time not saying its impossible.)
__________________
08 Mustang GT Premium 5 Speed Manual



Want to stripe your mustang? Check out my guide on Applying vinyl stripes! Please pm me for question
Pnkhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 08:15 AM   #13
hellion_79
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Camas, Washington
Posts: 4,871
Send a message via Yahoo to hellion_79
Default

Corvettes are light. No wonder they get good MPG.
__________________
74 F100 (runs & drives) & 93 Dodge Shadow (took a dump)
hellion_79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 11:43 AM   #14
92lxsleeper
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Vehicle: 1997 Thunderbird
Location: Lincoln, Rhode Island
Posts: 2,262
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hellion_79 View Post
Corvettes are light. No wonder they get good MPG.
my car is light also. it weighed in at 3353 lbs with me in it, and a full tank of fuel.
__________________
I'll kick your sorry arses so hard you'll kiss the moons.

1997 Ford Thunderbird LX
3.8L Essex V6
145hp 215 ft/lb torque.
92lxsleeper is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
351, 351w, mark, vii

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company