5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

which is better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2003, 06:24 PM
  #1  
t3000
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
t3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 200
Default which is better?

Hey everyone it's me again. I'm still looking for a stang but I might have to get an earlier year than expected which is not a big deal. I do want to know which is better though. A carbed 302 or a fuel injected 302? Any answer is appreciated thanks.
t3000 is offline  
Old 11-02-2003, 06:25 PM
  #2  
Jugador1
I ♥ Acer
 
Jugador1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 2,963
Default which is better?

definately fuel injected if you dont plan on swapping engines
Jugador1 is offline  
Old 11-02-2003, 07:57 PM
  #3  
gt200mph
1st Gear Member
 
gt200mph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 93
Default which is better?

they both have there good and bad points....for me ,well i just got sick of dealing with the surging idle and the random stalling for no godamm reason....screw efi carb all the way......
gt200mph is offline  
Old 11-02-2003, 07:59 PM
  #4  
vfast
I ♥ Acer
 
vfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Posts: 11,394
Default which is better?

carb
vfast is offline  
Old 11-02-2003, 08:18 PM
  #5  
Buzzstang
4th Gear Member
 
Buzzstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Poplar Grove, KY
Posts: 1,656
Default which is better?



Well it is what ever you like. The fuel injected is easier for beginners because you really dont have to adjust anything the computer does it for you where a carb is a little more detailed.</P>
Buzzstang is offline  
Old 11-02-2003, 09:05 PM
  #6  
t3000
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
t3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 200
Default which is better?



ok which one repsonds better to mods?</P>
t3000 is offline  
Old 11-02-2003, 09:10 PM
  #7  
95Stealth302
4th Gear Member
 
95Stealth302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 1,077
Default which is better?

Carb better and easier to mod, less worry about emmisions shtuff, and way easier to make fast, with less money spent.
95Stealth302 is offline  
Old 11-03-2003, 05:23 AM
  #8  
horatio102
4th Gear Member
 
horatio102's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: B'ham, WA
Posts: 1,484
Default which is better?

For maximum potential, fuel injection is the way to go. Why? Because carbs are universal. You set the idle mixture, then you replace rods/jets or whatever to get the WOT dialed in. What about everything in between? Cruising, etc. With fuel injection you make your own maps, optimize the air/fuel ratio for all RPMs, loads, whatever. You can program it for power or for fuel economy, or even for emissions. It's certainly not easy, not by a long shot, but for ultimate potential the fuel injection is the way to go.

But carbs are easier to muck with. There are far fewer parts to buy. Take the carb out of the box and slap it on and it's almost guaranteed to run (may not be perfect, but it'll work).

Surging idle... stalling for no reason? That's from improper tuning of the fuel injection. Idle set too low, dashpot decay rates not right... it can be fixed EASILY with a little tuning.

The other advantage of fuel injection is that you get in, turn the key, and drive. You don't have to wait 15 minutes for the engine to warm up before it'll let you put it in gear (my truck HATES the cold weather).
horatio102 is offline  




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 PM.