supercharger or turbo
#14
RE: supercharger or turbo
ORIGINAL: 1991_5.0_Convertible
Go with a turbo, you can make some insane boost numbers with a built engine.
Go with a turbo, you can make some insane boost numbers with a built engine.
#15
RE: supercharger or turbo
Turbo is more efficent,and easier on the motor IMO...since a turbo usess exhaust gasses to make boost,while a centrifigual charger relies on the motor itself since its crank driving also a turbo will make more power with less boost than any charger out there just because of the simple fact that it is exhaust driven and dosent put strain on the motor......that's why i can smell a turbo in my future.
#16
RE: supercharger or turbo
a turbo could be cheaper if done right and alot of research is looked up. ever see the guy who twin turboed his fox? i gotta find the link he flipped his shorty headers upside down and began building. only downside or thing bad he did was use to stock turbos from a dodge daytona,which would be way undersized for a mustang. 2 to4b's are what you'd be wanting for some more effiect power.
nothing like boost coming on and throwing you in the seat i gotta agree.
turbo owns,even if you had a all motor mustang with 600 hp and a turbo stang with 600 hp the turbo would win in most cases
nothing like boost coming on and throwing you in the seat i gotta agree.
turbo owns,even if you had a all motor mustang with 600 hp and a turbo stang with 600 hp the turbo would win in most cases
#17
RE: supercharger or turbo
hey, found the link syn was talking about, its in junkyard performance.
http://www.homemadeturbo.com/turbo_projects/rs_mustang/
good luck
http://www.homemadeturbo.com/turbo_projects/rs_mustang/
good luck
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
10-01-2015 09:21 AM