5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

Expected dyno numbers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-19-2013, 12:19 AM
  #1  
Duncan_GT
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Duncan_GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Indy
Posts: 1,353
Default Expected dyno numbers?

I want to get some opinions on expected power numbers. I'm waiting on the turn around time for my long tubes and then this thing will finally be done. Here's the combo:

393ci 351w
9.7:1 CR
Fully forged rotating assembly
Trickflow TW 205's
Trickflow R intake
75mm throttle body
90mm MAF
42lb injectors
255lph fuel pump
Comp camshaft, .580/.580 lift, 236/248 @.05 dur, 114 LSA
1 3/4" Accufab long tubes
3" exhaust

Take a couple guesses and let me know what you guys think.
Duncan_GT is offline  
Old 01-19-2013, 12:49 AM
  #2  
tinman
5th Gear Member
 
tinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,103
Default

Maybe 400-425.......
That low compression is hurting the cam.
I'll run a program on it tomorrow and see........
tinman is offline  
Old 01-19-2013, 06:30 AM
  #3  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

ditch the 75mm tb, no reason to bottle neck it there, that may hurt it a tad
mjr46 is offline  
Old 01-19-2013, 09:05 AM
  #4  
Duncan_GT
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Duncan_GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Indy
Posts: 1,353
Default

Originally Posted by tinman
Maybe 400-425.......
That low compression is hurting the cam.
Thats what I was thinking. I was thinking of having the heads milled, theyve got 65cc combustion chambers right now. Is that the best way to raise compression?
Duncan_GT is offline  
Old 01-19-2013, 09:07 AM
  #5  
Duncan_GT
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Duncan_GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Indy
Posts: 1,353
Default

Originally Posted by mjr46
ditch the 75mm tb, no reason to bottle neck it there, that may hurt it a tad
The intake has a 75mm opening. Should i get a smaller maf?
Duncan_GT is offline  
Old 01-19-2013, 07:55 PM
  #6  
Venomantidote95
4th Gear Member
 
Venomantidote95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: alabama
Posts: 1,812
Default

Don`t change the size of the TB a 75mm can support that kind of air demand easily! It can actually help with intake airspeed....

You could use a 76mm MAF and keep the induction airspeed up thru the entire system!

I will be re-using my 76/75mm combo on my 351 stroker!

Take the venturi sizes from a 750 or 850 carb and compare the numbers to the 75mm tb not much difference in combined size!

I once posted the cfms on the different sizes of TB`s on here idk if it is still on here, numbers from the R&D from a major manufacturer of throttle bodies.


A 75mm tb can support upwards of 450 cubes unless your all out racing!

Do the common since rule here if your intake opening is at max 75mm anything over that just before it is a waste!

If you did want to run anything bigger and do it right you need to swap to the box-R upper then you can go to 90mm on the Tb.

Oh and my guess on the power is 404 rwhp!

Last edited by Venomantidote95; 01-19-2013 at 07:58 PM.
Venomantidote95 is offline  
Old 01-20-2013, 08:08 AM
  #7  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

Originally Posted by Venomantidote95

I will be re-using my 76/75mm combo on my 351 stroker!
let us know how well that works for ya'
mjr46 is offline  
Old 01-21-2013, 07:05 AM
  #8  
Venomantidote95
4th Gear Member
 
Venomantidote95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: alabama
Posts: 1,812
Default

^^^ sure thing!
Venomantidote95 is offline  
Old 01-21-2013, 09:30 PM
  #9  
tinman
5th Gear Member
 
tinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,103
Default

OK, I ran the new program that I have on it but it's real new to me so I may have fed it some garbage (lol).
I had to use a CFM for airflow of the induction so I used 750.
I got the thing @ 487 HP @ 6000 with 485 FT/LB @ 4500.
Just a little stronger than I thought it was going to be.
I've run a lot of programs on my own carbed car and I know my numbers are just fine for the MPH it runs so I think these are at least close.......
tinman is offline  
Old 01-21-2013, 09:31 PM
  #10  
tinman
5th Gear Member
 
tinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,103
Default

This info is flywheel numbers BTW..........
tinman is offline  


Quick Reply: Expected dyno numbers?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09 AM.