Supercharger VS Turbo Charger for the 5.0
#33
considering the fastest stock-engine 5.0s are running Rousch TVS blowers or whipples in the 1/4, i'd say you are wrong. high 9s-10.0s stock besides wheels/tires/blower. the fastest centri blown 5.0 i've seen so far is running mid-low 10s. same with the helion turbo 5.0. you can sit there and bench race and ricer math it all you want. The proof is in the 1/4 mile numbers.
#34
considering the fastest stock-engine 5.0s are running Rousch TVS blowers or whipples in the 1/4, i'd say you are wrong. high 9s-10.0s stock besides wheels/tires/blower. the fastest centri blown 5.0 i've seen so far is running mid-low 10s. same with the helion turbo 5.0. you can sit there and bench race and ricer math it all you want. The proof is in the 1/4 mile numbers.
In a road race (like, on an actual race track), an engine's ability to maintain torque and HP at high RPM for long periods of time is far more important. Equally important is weight savings, and I would argue that a centri or TC weighs quite a bit less up front than a Roots or Eaton would.
Equally as important (to me), but somewhat more subjective, is the character your choice in boost adder gives to the engine. To me, an engine with a big ol' Whipple sticking out the top has a different character than one with a turbine-whine Vortech slung low by the (metaphorical) hip.
But, if your goal in putting a charger of some sort on your engine is solely to reduce 1/4' times, then by all means, find the largest displacement PD blower you can find on it and let 'er rip. IMHO they reduce the versatility of the engine, though. And let's make no mistake, this is one of the most versatile engines Ford has produced in a long, long time.
#35
Wildwes: no, they dont need to be all the same. but yes, some of the cars had the same exact suspension and wheels and tires. But im not talking about 2 cars, there are several people who have duplicated these results, it's the law of averages.
Hawkeye18: the 1/4 mile time slip can tell you a lot about the car. the 60' the difference in ETs and Traps between the 1/8th and 1/4. if you know what you are looking for it can tell you a lot about the car. A race track will tell you more about the suspension and wheels and tires and brakes and driver ability than it will of over all power. your typical street race is in a straight lane.
I really dont even know what to say to your last 2 paragraphs? engine character and versitality of the engine?
Hawkeye18: the 1/4 mile time slip can tell you a lot about the car. the 60' the difference in ETs and Traps between the 1/8th and 1/4. if you know what you are looking for it can tell you a lot about the car. A race track will tell you more about the suspension and wheels and tires and brakes and driver ability than it will of over all power. your typical street race is in a straight lane.
I really dont even know what to say to your last 2 paragraphs? engine character and versitality of the engine?
Last edited by Mishri; 08-21-2011 at 12:08 PM.
#36
Opinions are like *** holes, everyone has one and they all smell.
Everyone has heard that and guess what, it's just as true today as it was when whoever the hell came up with that line. OP you NEED to do a LOT of research to answer this question on your own. No one here IMO can fully answer this question but you, and that requires honestly...months of research. Then once you figure out which form of forced induction lines up with obtaining your goals the best. Then you can ask more specific questions.
Just my $0.02.
Everyone has heard that and guess what, it's just as true today as it was when whoever the hell came up with that line. OP you NEED to do a LOT of research to answer this question on your own. No one here IMO can fully answer this question but you, and that requires honestly...months of research. Then once you figure out which form of forced induction lines up with obtaining your goals the best. Then you can ask more specific questions.
Just my $0.02.
Last edited by Ripper Alpha; 08-25-2011 at 04:50 PM.
#37
That post is factually, and conceptually, wrong. Centrifugal blowers (Vortech, etc.) do not have lag, like a turbo. The lag in a turbo is caused by the amount of time it takes for the engine's exhaust to sufficiently spool up the turbine to create boost. A centri SC is driven directly by a belt, thus lag is equal to that of any other belt-drive supercharger.
Twin turbos would be a good option, as then you could reduce the size of each turbo to one that would eliminate most lag, but then you run into the problem of "Where the hell do I put them?" That's a lot of piping and intercooling to deal with. Twin turbo 5.0 sounds pretty bad-***, though...
Hell, if I ha my way, I would have a single turbo for each and every cylinder. An octa-turbo set-up with each individual turbo specifically tuned the right size) for the cylinder it services. Of course the plumbing-works for all 8 and to/from the intercooler(s) in an S197 engine bay will be a true spaghetti bowl, but so long as it is symmetrical, I will love it. I would even have a custom high rise hood made to accommodate the pipework that is sure to have to come above the engine.
I am a serious proponent for variable vane turbos, boy howdy do they cost the world. I wish they were considerably cheaper and standard in ALL turbos out there. I can only dream.
#38
Doing some searching, I found this 8-turbo set-up. I love how this guy laid out his engine bay with the pipework
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLfujQrr2yA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLfujQrr2yA
#40
But while you do not have to touch a thing under any of that crap, they sure do look beautiful.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
10-01-2015 09:21 AM
1994, 50, cai, charge, charger, coyote, fast, make, mustang, super, supercharged, supercharger, turbo, turbo charger, turbocharger