Notices
5.0L V8 Technical Discussions Any questions about the 'Coyote' engine, transmission, exhaust, tuners/CAI, or gearing can be asked here!

2011 GT mpg question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-2011, 02:17 AM
  #21  
Lem-06
4th Gear Member
 
Lem-06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,226
Default

Originally Posted by JIM5.0
You, sir, are cheating
what, isnt that what everyone, including car manufacturers do to up their posted mpg's? :P
Lem-06 is offline  
Old 12-31-2011, 09:50 AM
  #22  
JIM5.0
5th Gear Member
 
JIM5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,404
Default

Lol, yeah, probably true. Kia advertises some of their models get over 30 mpg hwy, but even after a good engine break in(3000 mi+), I had people tell me that they can't reach that 30mpg. They say they don't floor it, but I am somewhat doubtful. In a four banger, I myself will floor it just to be able to accelerate with the traffic flow.
They say they don't have mods of tunes, but I don't know for sure. I never looked under their hoods. I do tend to believe this because, why would anyone mod a Kia?
JIM5.0 is offline  
Old 12-31-2011, 10:02 AM
  #23  
Maraman
3rd Gear Member
 
Maraman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 786
Default

Originally Posted by JIM5.0
Lol, yeah, probably true. Kia advertises some of their models get over 30 mpg hwy, but even after a good engine break in(3000 mi+), I had people tell me that they can't reach that 30mpg. They say they don't floor it, but I am somewhat doubtful. In a four banger, I myself will floor it just to be able to accelerate with the traffic flow.
They say they don't have mods of tunes, but I don't know for sure. I never looked under their hoods. I do tend to believe this because, why would anyone mod a Kia?
So they can run them 12's yo
Maraman is offline  
Old 12-31-2011, 10:16 AM
  #24  
Snakebite64
4th Gear Member
 
Snakebite64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: dark side of the moon
Posts: 1,532
Default

with my old lump and driving in the foothills of the Rockies I have seen 28.2 Canadian mpg which is fantastic in my mind
Snakebite64 is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 05:29 PM
  #25  
extreme28
 
extreme28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 3
Default

Got average of 26.2 mpg driving my 2011 GT 65-70mph. Dropped to 25.2 mpg after I drove it 75-85mph, mostly highway.
Car is stock with 3000 miles on it.
Its my first Mustang and I cant belive how comfy the car was on a longer trip. Drove it today from Frisco NC to Long Isand NY, 560 miles. Not only got great gas millage but had fun driving it. Realized one thing tough, its SO EASY to speed in this car, 100mph didint feelt lie it at all. Sorry to go a little of topic, Im still very excited about my new car :-)
extreme28 is offline  
Old 01-07-2012, 09:42 PM
  #26  
GAZRNR
 
GAZRNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: GA
Posts: 19
Default

I getting around 23 MPG driving it easy.
GAZRNR is offline  
Old 01-08-2012, 08:28 AM
  #27  
Ditty
2nd Gear Member
 
Ditty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: MD
Posts: 445
Default

Averaging 17.3 per the computer with about 50/50 city/hwy. Have almost 6200 miles since Oct. Almost always 93 oct. (maybe a total of 10-15 gallons of 89 since I bought it.) On trips longer than 40-50 miles, MPGs are awesome. 26-28mpgs. In town. Ugg, it BAD. 10-15mpgs. I'm pretty happy w/ 17-18 average though. My big-*** truck got a BEST of 20mpgs on a trip. And 93 is MUCH cheaper than Diesel these days. Car is saving me about $15-20 a week in fuel!
Ditty is offline  
Old 01-08-2012, 11:55 AM
  #28  
JIM5.0
5th Gear Member
 
JIM5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,404
Default

Yeah, I see the same thing. In trips around town, no hwy at all, all speed limits 50MPH or less, my in-city only MPG drops to maybe 16MPG avg. Stop lights and slow speed limits completely DESTROY fuel economy.

As for gas being cheaper than diesel, I hate to say savor the moment. Car sales in China is sky-rocketing, China already out-strips the US in cars being bought. In the next several years, there will be enough car drivers in Asia such that they will put an extreme pressure on the global fuel supply for gasolines, and gasolines will once again be much higher than diesel.
The only reason why diesel is actually higher now, is because massively industrializing countries like China, India, & Brazil, of course are first buying tremendous numbers of trucks and diesel trains to support they new factories. But once their general populations start buying cars (which will of course vastly be gasoline fueled), then the gas prices will will jump to ~$5 USD for 87 octane at the pump for us. And diesel will hit around the $4 per gal mark.
I do not know what the current predictions are for when this will happen, but I know it will happen unless there is a huge paradigm shift in fuel usage.
JIM5.0 is offline  
Old 01-19-2012, 03:14 PM
  #29  
aequitas4
 
aequitas4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 12
Default

With my 2011 5.0 manual with 3.73 gears I hold it at no less than 80mph from Baton Rouge to Houston and see almost exactly 22.0 mpg every time
aequitas4 is offline  
Old 01-19-2012, 03:50 PM
  #30  
Wpipes
1st Gear Member
 
Wpipes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 85
Default

Originally Posted by JIM5.0
If you have 3.73:1 rear gears, yeah, the fuel mileage will not be the advertised 26mpg hwy.
Also, you car will improve in mpg once you reach 5000 miles.

I have 3.31:1 rear gears on mine and on straight highway at 70mph, I get 28mpg. I have seen on rare occasions 30-31mpg average.

What destroys fuel mileage are stop signs, stop lights, and speed limits less than 60mph. City driving. In city driving I see high teens mpg avg.
Mixed hwy and city I see 21-23 mpg avg over a month time.
Actually, to get the best MPG highway, a speed of 55mph is the best. Your manual will confirm (if you don't believe me ) as well as any physics major that speeds over 55mph will exponentially lower your MPG. Sports cars may be better because they are built for aerodynamics, but as I said, even our vehicle manuals will tell us the difference between 55mph and 65mph is a 15% loss in gas efficency.

http://mpgforspeed.com/
Wpipes is offline  


Quick Reply: 2011 GT mpg question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 AM.