Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

would you support a switch to metric?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2006, 12:36 AM
  #1  
Decurion
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Decurion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The unemployment epicenter, Detroit, MI
Posts: 432
Default would you support a switch to metric?

I made mention of switching to Metric on another forum and kind of started something, so I thought Id post it a little more formally here. Would you support an official U.S. switch to metric? This would mean temperatures being read in Celcius, distance measured in kilometers, buying pop by the .5 liter, weighing your car in kilograms, etc etc etc. The U.S. is about the only (if not THE only) country to still use the antiquated english system of measure. so without using a calculator or a conversion chart or anything, how many inches in a mile? how many cups in a quart? how many pints in a gallon? water freezes at what? 32? boils at 212? ...he told me to remember 32 ounces, but did he mean volume or weight?? With the metric system,theres no need to remember all this jibberish since the entire measuring system is liters, meters, and grams. Simple as that, with the prefixes (kilo, deci, milli, etc) being the only multiple to remember, and its all based on tens! I think my view is pretty obvious, so whats yours? Would you support an official switch to metric or not?

...and hopefully this works right, this is the first poll ive ever done
Decurion is offline  
Old 11-03-2006, 12:40 AM
  #2  
BakoLuke
3rd Gear Member
 
BakoLuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 751
Default RE: would you support a switch to metric?

base 10 makes much more sense!
BakoLuke is offline  
Old 11-03-2006, 12:43 AM
  #3  
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 11,808
Default RE: would you support a switch to metric?

yeah might as well theres not a new car thats made that doesnt have metric hardware. ill never support a single monetary system like the euro in europe though
rmodel65 is offline  
Old 11-03-2006, 12:47 AM
  #4  
Colorado_Mustang
5th Gear Member
 
Colorado_Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 4,089
Default RE: would you support a switch to metric?

Why be a follower? The US has a very large infrastructure and the true cost to convert would be very large. It'd be better to spend the money on something that is actually worth while...like defense.

The US is slowly converting, which is the speed you really want to go.

BTW, you can't weigh anything in kilograms. The proper unit for force is the Newton. Grams are used for mass. And you thought the US system is messed up?

Why would you use an inch to measure a distance of a mile? 1 mile, 184 yards, 2 feet, and 10 inches. Works for me. I don't need to say that's 70,018 inches....kinda stupid, really. Quick....how many millimeters to the moon?
Colorado_Mustang is offline  
Old 11-03-2006, 12:48 AM
  #5  
Decurion
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Decurion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The unemployment epicenter, Detroit, MI
Posts: 432
Default RE: would you support a switch to metric?


ORIGINAL: BakoLuke

base 10 makes much more sense!
THANK YOU! and great sig pic too!

ORIGINAL: rmodel65
ill never support a single monetary system like the euro in europe though
we already have it. we have 50 seperate states, all of which use the same currency. ya, I know, a little different but still. They had a bazillion different countries, none of which were much bigger than Michigan and all used different currencies. But lets not get on a tangent here.
Decurion is offline  
Old 11-03-2006, 01:37 AM
  #6  
Brandontyler65
I ♥ Acer
 
Brandontyler65's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,845
Default RE: would you support a switch to metric?

the official system for the us is the metric system look it up we had this discussion a while ago in physics
Brandontyler65 is offline  
Old 11-03-2006, 01:54 AM
  #7  
valley firearms
5th Gear Member
 
valley firearms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
Posts: 2,505
Default RE: would you support a switch to metric?

would you consider speaking Chinese tomorrow? Not a chance!
valley firearms is offline  
Old 11-03-2006, 02:06 AM
  #8  
Scott H.
5th Gear Member
 
Scott H.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,445
Default RE: would you support a switch to metric?

There are definite differences between the American metric version and what the rest of the world uses. I've got a tool box full of crap to prove it.
The switch has both cost us a lot of money, as well as added a lot of money to the economy. My thread pitch gauge gets a workout. Then you talk about hydraulic fittings, heck we've got SAE, JIC, Whetworth...
It's enough to drive you to drinking Coors by the Liter!

I think the Canadians did a better change over than we did. That said, our gross national product dwarfs the rest of the North American continent so this is much more complex an issue. Just look at the amount of lobbyists we had working to slow this whole thing down.

New Mustangs, give me metrics. Classic Mustangs, I want a G.T.350, not a G.T.140
Scott H. is offline  
Old 11-03-2006, 02:18 AM
  #9  
atomsk680
5th Gear Member
 
atomsk680's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 3,806
Default RE: would you support a switch to metric?

i like metrics, but not for wrenches. im used to american metrics for tools
atomsk680 is offline  
Old 11-03-2006, 03:19 AM
  #10  
ford65stang
2nd Gear Member
 
ford65stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 329
Default RE: would you support a switch to metric?

its just damm easier !!!! damm the 13 doesnt fit too small ok 14..... Now we dont have to think
ford65stang is offline  


Quick Reply: would you support a switch to metric?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 PM.