1967 vin question
#21
RE: 1967 vin question
ORIGINAL: grruminator78
okay am I missing something. The car is a 67. 67 390s had S, 68 390s had Y correct. So if the vin has a Y shouldn't it be a 68?
okay am I missing something. The car is a 67. 67 390s had S, 68 390s had Y correct. So if the vin has a Y shouldn't it be a 68?
#22
RE: 1967 vin question
well that's what I was getting at, could just be an incorrect vin. Would love to see the marti report, in that case it could be a rare 67 vert...
I'm as interested as anyone should be about a wierd occurance. Like I said I'm not calling anyone a liar, it's just a little strange
I'm as interested as anyone should be about a wierd occurance. Like I said I'm not calling anyone a liar, it's just a little strange
#23
RE: 1967 vin question
It would be interesting to see if this is a numbers matching car. Mustangs were not numbers matching (VIN stamped into the block and all other major parts) until 1968. If this sucker is numbers matching, then it is a 68. Hmmmm. That opens up all kinds of possibilities, doesn't it?
#24
RE: 1967 vin question
yeah, like I said crazy. I'd love pics and what not, a full vin would be nice too. Sure it's possible it was a late 67 and they put the correct vin # on there, but whatever. a picture is worth 1000 words as they say. I just would hate for whoever is buying this thing to get a junker/fake when they thought they were getting a gem. Also like I said before, who really cares??
If it's a decent price (hasn't said or I missed how much they want for it) and a driver with a 390 (or any V8) it's still a good buy. My vin says 289, but I got a 302!!
If it's a decent price (hasn't said or I missed how much they want for it) and a driver with a 390 (or any V8) it's still a good buy. My vin says 289, but I got a 302!!
#25
RE: 1967 vin question
Ok, dumb question here, but you say mustangs werent numbers matching till 68 n that this year has the stamp in all major parts. DId the 67's not have stamps throughought the car? and what would really make the car a number matching car?
#26
RE: 1967 vin question
ORIGINAL: badazz68stang
Ok, dumb question here, but you say mustangs werent numbers matching till 68 n that this year has the stamp in all major parts. DId the 67's not have stamps throughought the car? and what would really make the car a number matching car?
Ok, dumb question here, but you say mustangs werent numbers matching till 68 n that this year has the stamp in all major parts. DId the 67's not have stamps throughought the car? and what would really make the car a number matching car?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
3
10-02-2015 08:06 AM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
10-01-2015 09:21 AM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM