Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

weiand vs. edelbrock

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-29-2007, 09:37 AM
  #11  
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
my77stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Citrus County, FL
Posts: 8,007
Default RE: weiand vs. edelbrock

i dont see what the difference would be? the point is that on a well breathing 302 the intake is better. it stands to reason the same would hold true with stock heads as well (after all, we ARE talking about comparing two rather mild dual plane intakes, its not like were talking performer vs. victor or something)
my77stang is offline  
Old 11-29-2007, 04:36 PM
  #12  
Reverb
2nd Gear Member
 
Reverb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location:
Posts: 234
Default RE: weiand vs. edelbrock

ORIGINAL: 67mustang302

Cooler air isn't entirely better. A cooler air charge is denser, so in that regard it's better, however fuel WILL NOT BURN if it's in a liquid form. One of carburetions advantages over EFI is that it promotes better fuel vaporization through the Joule-Thompson effect. It's not the air charge that you want warm, but the manifold itself. When the air/fuel charge enters the manifold, it will absorb heat from the metal inthe manifoldwhich causes the fuel to vaporize in the mixture. This actually has the net effect of absorbing heat from the intake, condensing the fuel/air charge, and changing the state of the fuel to a vapor(yes, the fuel changes from a liquid to a vapor, but the entire mixture DECREASES in volume), all without any major change to the temperature of the charge itself. It gets into some thermodynamics that deals with pressure changes and volume changes of gasses. You also want a warmer fuel/air charge because it needs to be hot in order to ignite, that's what the compression cylce in the ngine is for, the spark plug alone can't ignite a fuel air charge effectively. Ideally you want a situation where the air going into your engine is as hot and as dense as possible, without resulting in detonation during combustion. Since hotter air is less dense, we generally try to get cooler air into the engine, mainly because the increase in density more than offsets the decreased burn rate from a cooler charge. Also, in most performance engines, you can raise compression to get the heat you need for combustion, and often detonation may be an issue, so the cooler air charge ends up being better. The manifold however you want to be able to warm up, though if you touch it while the engine is running, it won't feel nearly as hot as the rest of the engine, as the charge absorbs heat from it. You also don't want too much heat, if the manifold has more heat than you need, then after the fuel changes states all you end up doing is heating the charge and it then begins to expand, losing density.

As far as a Victor intake, I wouldn't put one on anything but a race car, or a monsterous street build with a large stroker.
The only reason you will put a warm air intake on a car is if you want to lose performance.
Reverb is offline  
Old 11-29-2007, 09:28 PM
  #13  
cylostang
 
cylostang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location:
Posts: 46
Default RE: weiand vs. edelbrock

The only reason you will put a warm air intake on a car is if you want to lose performance.
You will use performance, but with warmer air the engine is much more efficient. resulting in better fuel economy( those of use who really care, if u want economy a V8 aint the way to go). Im still debating on the X-CELerator(7515) and the RPM Air Gap(7521). Its like compairing apples to oranges, the endurashine finish looks hot but i wana keep my cars useless BS to a minimum....but it is hot, like the elite valve covers(no logo)....
[align=left] [/align]
cylostang is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Diode Dynamics
Vendor For Sale / Group Buy Classifieds
28
05-26-2022 12:02 PM
JT76
Street/Strip
6
09-20-2015 11:32 AM
tramphardrocker
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
6
09-13-2015 08:56 PM
YoungStangsMan
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
15
09-05-2015 07:01 PM



Quick Reply: weiand vs. edelbrock



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21 PM.