Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

HP vs TOURQUE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2005, 09:38 AM
  #21  
birdman076
2nd Gear Member
 
birdman076's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 299
Default RE: HP vs TOURQUE

Torque gets you going, horse power keeps you rolling. Its that simple but the problems arise when trying to hook up all the torque to the pavement to get you going faster. If you build for torque, you don't have to spin the motor as hard because its all low end grunt. But now you have to worry about putting it all to the ground, then parts breakage becomes an issue. If you build for HP then you have to invest in high dollar high rpm parts, and now you suffer off the line, but come on strong on the top end. Usually $$$ will dictate the kind of build, and personally I'd rather deal with hooking up/ breaking suspension and chassis stuff, then having to fork out alot of cash for high rpm components. Then having your car feel like a dog and have a big top end charge lol that to me seems disappointing at the least. But hey thats my .02
birdman076 is offline  
Old 03-15-2005, 09:48 AM
  #22  
pipeliner
1st Gear Member
 
pipeliner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 147
Default RE: HP vs TOURQUE

Im kinda curious now. Since Hp is a calculation from torque, I wonder how much torque my lawn mower has. Im gonna go figure it out
pipeliner is offline  
Old 03-15-2005, 10:33 AM
  #23  
angcobra
4th Gear Member
 
angcobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,724
Default RE: HP vs TOURQUE

If you know the RPM of the HP rating then it is very easy. That will tell you the Torque at that RPM, even though the peak Torque maybe higer at a different RPM.

ORIGINAL: pipeliner

Im kinda curious now. Since Hp is a calculation from torque, I wonder how much torque my lawn mower has. Im gonna go figure it out
angcobra is offline  
Old 03-15-2005, 11:52 AM
  #24  
rsw007
4th Gear Member
 
rsw007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: south carolina
Posts: 1,037
Default RE: HP vs TOURQUE

just bore the 351 .30 over and that will be plenty of power with good street cam and heads
rsw007 is offline  
Old 03-15-2005, 11:52 AM
  #25  
roundman
5th Gear Member
 
roundman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location:
Posts: 4,813
Default RE: HP vs TOURQUE

ORIGINAL: drewsky

thanks for all that but the question has still not been answered. wich will make my car faster on the street a 289 or a 351 stroked or not. thanks
a 351 would be a better street engine IMO.
roundman is offline  
Old 03-15-2005, 02:14 PM
  #26  
vfast
I ♥ Acer
 
vfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Posts: 11,394
Default RE: HP vs TOURQUE

my head hurts after reading rd's post
vfast is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 03:39 AM
  #27  
83GT306
1st Gear Member
 
83GT306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Indy
Posts: 90
Default RE: HP vs TOURQUE

He he he...it's not dead 'til my part's said.

Definitely 351w over a 302 for a street engine.

This whole thing about Torque vs. HP will never end because some people will never understand anyway. Like some here said, if you notice a dyno chart, at 2500 rpms HP is only like 100-125, while Torque can be well into the 300 ft. lbs. or more range. So it's easy to see that a stout Torque curve is the main factor for moving your car quickly on the street.
It all depends on the camshaft selection you choose. You want one with enough grunt to move you off the line. And that will have to do with choosing the right duration with your compression ratio.
A good rule of thumb for a street cam is the least amount of duration @ 0.50, with the highest amount of possible lift, and a suitable amount of overlap (LSA) for cylinder filling.
A cam with less overlap (112-114 LSA) will be lazy off the line, but Torque will build slowly and peak later in the rpms while continuing to produce HP at high rpms as long as your heads and intake etc...can let it.
A cam with more overlap (108-110 LSA) will enhance cylinder filling off the line because it creates a scavenging effect, pulling in more intake charge because the intake and exhaust cam lobes on the same cylinder hold both valves open shortly at the same time. This will build Torque quicker in the rpms, but the Torque will peak sooner in the rpm range, although HP continues to climb the scale just as the less overlap cam.

The Torque and HP paths cross at 5250 rpms on a scale, and you'll notice that Torque is falling off while HP keeps climbing.

Well, for me, I'd go with the most possible Torque down low because HP is going to be there anyway if your heads and intake can support the climb at higher rpms.
A street car needs to be built for low end torque with a reasonable rpm limit (5000-5500).
Save the 7000 rpm cam for the Salt Flats, that's the only place you'll be able to use it.

83GT306 is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 11:30 AM
  #28  
dodgestang
5th Gear Member
 
dodgestang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Insanity
Posts: 2,176
Default RE: HP vs TOURQUE

Perhaps you should define high rev.

My 408c revs till and still makes power till 7k

Do you mean you want a motor thats is out and done by 5-5500...
or
Do you mean you want a motor that goes till 10k?

Its interesting the things you can do with a street car.

With a 4.11 or better gear in the back and an OD trans you would be surpirsed how easy it is to get to 6500 in a street car while merging....or passing....or just driving the way I do....and then lock it down into OD and cruise at a reasonable RPM.
dodgestang is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 03:36 PM
  #29  
83GT306
1st Gear Member
 
83GT306's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Indy
Posts: 90
Default RE: HP vs TOURQUE

ORIGINAL: dodgestang

Perhaps you should define high rev.

My 408c revs till and still makes power till 7k

Do you mean you want a motor thats is out and done by 5-5500...
or
Do you mean you want a motor that goes till 10k?

Its interesting the things you can do with a street car.

With a 4.11 or better gear in the back and an OD trans you would be surpirsed how easy it is to get to 6500 in a street car while merging....or passing....or just driving the way I do....and then lock it down into OD and cruise at a reasonable RPM.
That depends on where you want your torque curve to start.
Does your cam start making serious torque at 2500-3000 rpms and then carries through to 7000?
That's why you'd need the 4.11 gear to get you moving off the line.

A cam that makes good power starting at 1500 rpms and rated for 5500 rpms is all a street engine needs.
With higher rpm cams you'll need to dump all kinds of extra money into stuff like stall converters, and gears etc...
I don't think many drivers rev and launch their cars from the stoplight at 3000 rpms. If they do, they're a public safety hazard.
And merging onto the interstate at 7000 rpms? You must be doing 100 mph by then. Not legal street driving.

But yes, a 408W will have alot of torque, though you shouldn't build an all out race engine for a daily driver.

But also the original poster here never stated whether or not it was a street or race engine, I just assumed street?

Either way, torque down low is good, and is what carries the car to the HP range, and like I said, the upper max rpm has to do with whether or not your heads, intake, and exhaust can support that max rpm.

I'm running a cam that is rated from 1500-5500 rpms and I've pushed it to atleast 6000 before, still making power. You can't expect to shove a high rpm cam in an engine that has all factory parts, intake, fuel, exhaust, etc...and attain the rpm the cam is rated for.
83GT306 is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 05:08 PM
  #30  
horseshoeing
3rd Gear Member
 
horseshoeing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location:
Posts: 590
Default RE: HP vs TOURQUE

I am going with Joe said. Hp power is for speed and torque is for a truck.
horseshoeing is offline  


Quick Reply: HP vs TOURQUE



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55 PM.