The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > General Tech
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-26-2009, 04:39 PM   #21
Fobra
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 3,635
Default

that was a 4 door sedan that was not anywhere near what that motor was capable of

How about you take from somebody who is building one of the LSX motors. Aftermarket heads on those motors flow 400+cfm can be stroked 511 cubes square. They are superior in almost every way from a racing standpoint. There is way to much internet racing going here. It takes a 18lbs of boost to get over 600 to the wheels on a mod motor, an LSX can make that NA...easy and hit over a 1000 with 10lbs or less. The difference here comes down to how much power your going to make on pump gas... Your talking modded to hell modulars that are not reliable and have to push 20lbs of boost to 800rwhp... the FORD GT, as bad as it is, itsnt that fast.... with a LSX instead of a 5.4 the GT would be like bugatti fast. Most of you just dont have experience building motors or being around bowtie stuff and there is just no comparison... as far as motor/power potential is concerned
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
TRADE MY Mach 1 HOOD + scoop set up for easy GT install (attached, no intake system necessary, unless you want it) for a COWL hood and maybe STOCK + CASH (but probably not). The hood is painted silver, in great shape, does need a color sand, but thats no biggie. Would prefer a swap for a silver one, but will consider many options. Need to trade due to changed plan on this car. RTP/Greensboro/Charlotte
Fobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 04:43 PM   #22
mustangcat
Hair Ballz
 
mustangcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Vehicle: 2000 Mustang GT
Location: SC, New Mexico
Posts: 1,728
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fobra View Post
Why? Because an Ls7 or LSX makes a modular ford look like a honda B series.
...It's a Ford Modular motor in the fastest production muscle car ever built, GT500 SS.
If the Mod motor is a B series, than the LS7 is definitely a Ecotec.
__________________
mustangcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 04:46 PM   #23
thunderhorse
2nd Gear Member
 
thunderhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Vehicle: 2002 Mustang GT
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 363
Default

If I thought the LSx engines were that much better than Ford's modulars, I wouldn't drive a Mustang. Yes they're good engines, but you're really just talking about the whole "no replacement for displacement" idea. What's wrong with boost? Boost on a V8 makes it crazy... look at a ZR1. It doesn't matter how you're getting power, it's the power to weight ratios (i.e. Lotus Elise.. 180hp? still manages 155 top end and sub 5-second 0-60mph times). Especially with a 5.4 or the new 6.2 Boss.. I think your argument will be outdated very soon.
__________________

Exhaust Vid - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCRPr3fzHuw
KB Raw Footage Vid - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8iUPIOSLe-w
Kenne Bell 2.1 IC @ 9PSI
thunderhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 05:03 PM   #24
acarzt
3rd Gear Member
 
acarzt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Vehicle: 2008 Mustang GT
Location: Texas
Posts: 931
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mustangcat View Post
...It's a Ford Modular motor in the fastest production muscle car ever built, GT500 SS.
If the Mod motor is a B series, than the LS7 is definitely a Ecotec.
Not to mention that guy Joe who put down over 1000 rwhp in his Twin Turbo Ford GT. :-)
__________________
'08 Alloy GT Manual
Audio:
Eclipse Navi/DVD/BT/Ipod/etc. Polk speakers, Alpine Type R 12" w/Alpine 600w Amp.
Performance:
Steeda CAI w/CF elbow, SCT x3 w/Brenspeed 93 octane tune
Pypes M80 Mufflers welded in
CMDPs
Track:
13.67@103.77 w/2.13 60'
(13.37@106 corrected for DA)
acarzt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 05:06 PM   #25
Fobra
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 3,635
Default

Make no mistake LS motors are that much better. You drive a mustang because it looks good, is cheap and is a better quality car than the F-body camaros etc. Thats why I drive a mustang, but im not delusional. And it matters alot how you make the power, there is nothing wrong with boost... but when 1 motor is dying to 700 rwhp and the other makes 1500 with equivalent boost, there is just no agrument to be had for a moduler being better or even equal to an ls motor.
__________________
TRADE MY Mach 1 HOOD + scoop set up for easy GT install (attached, no intake system necessary, unless you want it) for a COWL hood and maybe STOCK + CASH (but probably not). The hood is painted silver, in great shape, does need a color sand, but thats no biggie. Would prefer a swap for a silver one, but will consider many options. Need to trade due to changed plan on this car. RTP/Greensboro/Charlotte
Fobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 05:08 PM   #26
Fobra
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 3,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by acarzt View Post
Not to mention that guy Joe who put down over 1000 rwhp in his Twin Turbo Ford GT. :-)
yeah there are evo making 1000 rwhp with 45lbs of boost to... so what.


but I figured this forum couldn't handle this topic
__________________
TRADE MY Mach 1 HOOD + scoop set up for easy GT install (attached, no intake system necessary, unless you want it) for a COWL hood and maybe STOCK + CASH (but probably not). The hood is painted silver, in great shape, does need a color sand, but thats no biggie. Would prefer a swap for a silver one, but will consider many options. Need to trade due to changed plan on this car. RTP/Greensboro/Charlotte
Fobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 05:31 PM   #27
Jizz
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 241
Default

The LSx motors are the best on the market today -imho.

But put a Ford in a Ford for crying out loud! There is no reason not to put a forged 5.4 in your mustang.
Jizz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 05:55 PM   #28
Fobra
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 3,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mustangcat View Post
...It's a Ford Modular motor in the fastest production muscle car ever built, GT500 SS.
If the Mod motor is a B series, than the LS7 is definitely a Ecotec.
pretty sure the zr1 will blow the paint off of it @ 6lbs of boost, not mention the fact that the blower on the zr is not even needed, it will make power than it comes with n/a... but people want blowers now-a-days... but a zr is a pulley and a tune away from damn near 1000rwhp
__________________
TRADE MY Mach 1 HOOD + scoop set up for easy GT install (attached, no intake system necessary, unless you want it) for a COWL hood and maybe STOCK + CASH (but probably not). The hood is painted silver, in great shape, does need a color sand, but thats no biggie. Would prefer a swap for a silver one, but will consider many options. Need to trade due to changed plan on this car. RTP/Greensboro/Charlotte

Last edited by Fobra; 03-26-2009 at 06:06 PM.
Fobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 06:23 PM   #29
mustangsneverdie
5th Gear Member
1985 Ford Mustang
 
mustangsneverdie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Vehicle: 1991 mustang
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,335
Default

knock the cubic in. to the same on both motors and I can promise you that the ford motor will make a helluva lot more power
__________________

91 mustang 5.0 lx,306 shortblock,E-303 cam,ported and polished E7's,rebuilt stock T-5,bbk E/L shorty headers,with their 2 1/2" o/r H-pipes,70 mm maf,3G alt.,upr adj. upper c/a's 3:73 gears. race weight with driver:3260,only a 100 lbs. more than the 85

85 mustang: parts car for now

Best time 13.7@ 102 mph 2.074 60' on street tires(in the '85)
Best time 14.3@ 96 mph 2.13 60' on street tires(in the '91)
mustangsneverdie is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 07:00 PM   #30
max427
2nd Gear Member
2004 Ford Mustang
 
max427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location:
Posts: 236
Default

i think ford builds a better motor. as far as the LS series goes? if ford built essentially the SAME motor for 45 years it'd be damn good too
how bout some OHC, and dare i say DOHC?

but in reality an LSx is a better motor for racing... a 2v LSx "stage 3 head" will flow 340cfm at .690, a mod 4v "stage 3" figure 225 @ .600, and the LS head is a 2 VALVE, non OHC design.
^using numbers easy to dig up, PRCs on the LSx and patriot on the 4v's
__________________
for sale best offer:
04 gt blk/blk
loaded, leather, 5-speed, jlt intake, off road h pipe, sct tune, steeda UDPs, nitto 555rs on 10.5 anthracite. asking $14500 or best offer.
max427 is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
jizz, ls, ls2, max, motor, mustang

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company