Notices
GT S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V8 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

2010 vs 2011 GT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-2013, 11:53 AM
  #1  
jdmskis`
Thread Starter
 
jdmskis`'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 18
Default 2010 vs 2011 GT

I am about to buy a Mustang GT and am not sure on a 2010 or a 2011. In either case I have isolated the Premium model with a stick and the trackpack option. I know the 2011 has a LOT more horsepower but in the tests I read, the differences in performance while real are not that staggering.

So what I am interested in are opinions on fuel mileage and/or reliability between the 4.6 with a 5 speed and a 5.0 with the 6. Any feedback would be helpful.
jdmskis` is offline  
Old 11-06-2013, 01:51 PM
  #2  
Mighty
1st Gear Member
 
Mighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 135
Default

I owned both. Well, a 2010 Premium GT and a 2012 Premium GT (and now a 2013). Go with the Coyote. On long trips, if I'm remembering correctly, I averaged very similar mileage. Also the Coyote performance is amazing. The only complaint I had about the 2012 was that 2nd and 3rd gear could be notchy at times.

Last edited by Mighty; 11-06-2013 at 01:54 PM.
Mighty is offline  
Old 11-06-2013, 01:58 PM
  #3  
Derf00
Gentleman's Relish
 
Derf00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 13,090
Default

I would not buy a 2011 just I would not buy a 2005 or 2006. First year build models have a number of problems that unless it was fixed under a TSB by a previous owner, you may get stuck fixing them out of your own pocket.

Get a 2012+ While stock for stock a 4.6L 3v vs a 5.0L 4v may not impress people a lot in their differences, a 4V motor will always respond better to mods.
Derf00 is offline  
Old 11-06-2013, 02:28 PM
  #4  
CFLstangGT
2nd Gear Member
 
CFLstangGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 300
Default

Having owned both a 4.6 and 5.0, candidly I would never buy the 10' because of the engine. It is a big difference, especially if you choose to modify it.
CFLstangGT is offline  
Old 11-06-2013, 06:14 PM
  #5  
jdmskis`
Thread Starter
 
jdmskis`'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 18
Default

Thanks for the input so far. On a 2011, how critical is the trackpack for a street car
jdmskis` is offline  
Old 11-06-2013, 07:34 PM
  #6  
MustangVixenGT
2nd Gear Member
 
MustangVixenGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Washington
Posts: 287
Default

It's not, you can get better performance if you just go with aftermarket stuff later if you want to upgrade.
MustangVixenGT is offline  
Old 11-06-2013, 10:30 PM
  #7  
daredevil95
4th Gear Member
 
daredevil95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: CT
Posts: 1,472
Default

2011 is the way to go, the 5.0 is way better then the 4.6 3V and the track pack, Brembo doesn't come with a spare tire, so that's something to keep in mind if your concerned about that sort of stuff.
daredevil95 is offline  
Old 11-06-2013, 10:55 PM
  #8  
MrSandman
5th Gear Member
 
MrSandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MO
Posts: 3,235
Default

The difference between a 2010 GT and 2011 GT is... the same as the difference between a 2010 4.0 vs 2010 4.6.. or 2011 3.7 vs 2011 5.0.

It may not be that "staggering" on paper.. but it is in real life driving... like many car lengths. Not dissing the 2010 at all.. but the gap is significant in the power department. Ive driven a 4.0, 4.6, and 5.0.. and "played" with more than a few 4.6s. My buddies with 4.6s didn't have a chance, despite my first time playing being the first week i owned the 11' and hadn't driven a 6 speed.

The 4.6 is rock solid. If you are not concerned about power in a big way, go with it. If you think you'll be saving for FI after the first time you are overtaken by a 5.0 in traffic.. the extra cost of the 5.0 is a better deal than paying to match the power with upgrading a 4.6.
MrSandman is offline  
Old 11-06-2013, 10:59 PM
  #9  
MrSandman
5th Gear Member
 
MrSandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MO
Posts: 3,235
Default

Originally Posted by Derf00
I would not buy a 2011 just I would not buy a 2005 or 2006. First year build models have a number of problems that unless it was fixed under a TSB by a previous owner, you may get stuck fixing them out of your own pocket.

Get a 2012+ While stock for stock a 4.6L 3v vs a 5.0L 4v may not impress people a lot in their differences, a 4V motor will always respond better to mods.
I have a build 2 2011. It has 40,000 miles. I don't baby it. Has not had one problem, and still feels brand new. No squeaks, ticks, nothing.
MrSandman is offline  
Old 11-06-2013, 11:26 PM
  #10  
SpartaPerformance
4th Gear Member
 
SpartaPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,291
Default

Hands down 5.0L, even if you don't modify its still nice to have the extra power.
SpartaPerformance is offline  


Quick Reply: 2010 vs 2011 GT



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 PM.