Mustang Videos This forum is for video's pertaining to Racing (Street/Strip), Interviews, Mustangs, and Off Topic.

vs. 470 hp 03 Cobra

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-2005, 04:52 AM
  #31  
99M3
 
99M3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 39
Default RE: vs. 470 hp 03 Cobra

You guys belive just in horsepower and not in weight. I belive you, cuz i saw ppl doin with 200hp hondas mid 13's . Just please post some pics from inside car, i wanna see how much did u strip it.
99M3 is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 05:15 AM
  #32  
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
2000GT4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
Default RE: vs. 470 hp 03 Cobra

ORIGINAL: shibby

unheard of....really?

the bottle was almost empty and surging when I hit it and the it finally let out around 4300 rpm...I firmly believe in nitrous....that's not even the best dyno sheet I have...I have a four position chip...let's just say that's position 2....position one is an NA tune....position 3 and 4 make more power than this sheet...

What in gods name is going on here. I am starting to think either :

a. your setting someone up bigtime
b. Your totally BSin
c. You are intentionall leaving off stuff on your webpage.

If you are making torque like this for real, on a non bs dyno (one that acutally shows your full RPM band) then you are sure as hell making a CRAPLOAD more horsepower. 414 at 4600? What are we talking here, close to 500 (at least) at 6K? Im thinking more like 550ish. I gotta assume with the cams your horsepower doesnt fall off one bit (but keeps climbing) right to 6K (mine did).

If your running anywhere near the #s you should be this dyno is leading to, or your simply making 589 Lb/Ft at ANY rpm, your gonna break something for 100 percent sure on stock internals.

NO WAY a stock 2v setup on the bottom end can handle power levels like this for long. Prepare to slide a piston clean out of the block.
2000GT4.6 is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 05:17 AM
  #33  
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
2000GT4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
Default RE: vs. 470 hp 03 Cobra

ORIGINAL: shibby

that would be right if I was spraying the car in those runs...but I wasn't....weight has ALOT to do with it....whether all the haters want to believe that or not...
SO.. what your telling me is that your wieght reductioned GT (which btw isnt that much lighter than mine, I dont have the mach 1000 to start with) with virtually the same mods as mine, minus supension work, so good for low 12s with no bottle? I am just not seeing this.

Also, an email from rearseatdelete.com states that "The weight savings with the plain rsd kit whether it has a logo or not, is between 40-45"(pounds).
2000GT4.6 is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 05:23 AM
  #34  
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
2000GT4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
Default RE: vs. 470 hp 03 Cobra

ORIGINAL: shibby

my RTs run from single digits to .020s...

60's on those Pepboy street tires are between 1.8s and 1.9s
Your cutting a 1.8 60' on pepboy street tires? I am finding this extremely hard to beileve. Your basically claiming 60' that are as good if not better than most of the guys on here with d/rs. In fact, MD recently only ran a 1.7ish 60' (granted not the best he can do) on SLICKS, not to mention 425+ RWHP, which you are DEFEINTALY not even coming close to without N20.

I am sorry, but i simply have a very hard time beileving a N/A, non fully built GT (no headwork, no intake), even with 600 pounds of weight reduction, is gonna hand a blown cobra its ***, espcially one with drag radials. Hell, I dont think a fully built GT would be able to do this, even with a good 325-335 RWHP, you still shouldnt be cutting a 12.00

290 HP vs 425+ HP, the numbers just dont add up.
2000GT4.6 is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 06:31 AM
  #35  
Driver_Kiddo
3rd Gear Member
 
Driver_Kiddo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: California, Los angeles
Posts: 700
Default RE: vs. 470 hp 03 Cobra

dude edit all in ONE post...ur a bad boy!! god damn triple!!



lol juuuusssst j/k...
Driver_Kiddo is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 07:28 AM
  #36  
FoxGT
5th Gear Member
 
FoxGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 3,451
Default RE: vs. 470 hp 03 Cobra

Nice ride & nice dyno.
FoxGT is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 11:23 AM
  #37  
OUZBnd
3rd Gear Member
 
OUZBnd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 920
Default RE: vs. 470 hp 03 Cobra


ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6

ORIGINAL: shibby

unheard of....really?

the bottle was almost empty and surging when I hit it and the it finally let out around 4300 rpm...I firmly believe in nitrous....that's not even the best dyno sheet I have...I have a four position chip...let's just say that's position 2....position one is an NA tune....position 3 and 4 make more power than this sheet...

What in gods name is going on here. I am starting to think either :

a. your setting someone up bigtime
b. Your totally BSin
c. You are intentionall leaving off stuff on your webpage.
If you are making torque like this for real, on a non bs dyno (one that acutally shows your full RPM band) then you are sure as hell making a CRAPLOAD more horsepower. 414 at 4600? What are we talking here, close to 500 (at least) at 6K? Im thinking more like 550ish. I gotta assume with the cams your horsepower doesnt fall off one bit (but keeps climbing) right to 6K (mine did).

If your running anywhere near the #s you should be this dyno is leading to, or your simply making 589 Lb/Ft at ANY rpm, your gonna break something for 100 percent sure on stock internals.

NO WAY a stock 2v setup on the bottom end can handle power levels like this for long. Prepare to slide a piston clean out of the block.
He said he was doing this
OUZBnd is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 12:02 PM
  #38  
94BOOSTDCobra
2nd Gear Member
 
94BOOSTDCobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location:
Posts: 163
Default RE: vs. 470 hp 03 Cobra

I know that weight reduction can help a great deal, but N/A runs in these videos???? No way, wont believe it, props on the kills however
94BOOSTDCobra is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 01:06 PM
  #39  
jdaniel
I ♥ Acer
 
jdaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Posts: 9,172
Default RE: vs. 470 hp 03 Cobra

I said the same thing. Im launching at 3500-4500 on Nittos and pulling a 1.8 60'. There is no way in hell you can be doing it on street tires. Sorry buddy... I aint believing it either.
jdaniel is offline  
Old 01-11-2005, 02:44 PM
  #40  
2000iav6
2nd Gear Member
 
2000iav6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location:
Posts: 213
Default RE: vs. 470 hp 03 Cobra

ORIGINAL: OUZBnd


ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6


What in gods name is going on here. I am starting to think either :

a. your setting someone up bigtime
b. Your totally BSin
c. You are intentionall leaving off stuff on your webpage.
If you are making torque like this for real, on a non bs dyno (one that acutally shows your full RPM band) then you are sure as hell making a CRAPLOAD more horsepower. 414 at 4600? What are we talking here, close to 500 (at least) at 6K? Im thinking more like 550ish. I gotta assume with the cams your horsepower doesnt fall off one bit (but keeps climbing) right to 6K (mine did).

If your running anywhere near the #s you should be this dyno is leading to, or your simply making 589 Lb/Ft at ANY rpm, your gonna break something for 100 percent sure on stock internals.

NO WAY a stock 2v setup on the bottom end can handle power levels like this for long. Prepare to slide a piston clean out of the block.
He said he was doing this
Nothing in God's name let me tell ya.

And I said he was doing that. You guys are hatin' big time, but like I said, you like facts and figures, too. So shibby, if you're not going to post a slip, you gotta take the heat.
Not that it would matter anyway, I guess. All it looks like that would accomplish would be outing yourself, because someone would prolly call that BS too. You post a dyno sheet and immediately someone calls it bs because it doesn't jive with what they are used to. Typical.

ORIGINAL: jdaniel

I said the same thing. Im launching at 3500-4500 on Nittos and pulling a 1.8 60'. There is no way in hell you can be doing it on street tires. Sorry buddy... I aint believing it either.
jd, there is a way in hell for just about EVERYTHING. You know what you know, no doubt, and you're a much more serious racer than me, but I'll give you a personal testamonial and you can believe it or not: I have a 66 SWB Ford p/u that had a vicous, nasty 429 in it, 3:89 spool, BFGoodrich 275-60-15 radials and no special suspension set up outside of bolt-on ladder bars. At the Texas Motorplex in absolutely PERFECT conditions, my late Uncle Harvey cut a 1.59 60' in it and all day long cut mid-low 1.60's. I could never get it below 2.0 because I just can't drive like he could. It's like he knew just how much throttle to lay down right before it started breaking loose and just kept it there. He said he could feel the traction dynamic. I'm talking about mad skills. And give him 5-10 runs in ANY vehicle and he'd have the right launch just about figured, how much throttle it could handle w/o busting loose, etc. It can happen.
2000iav6 is offline  


Quick Reply: vs. 470 hp 03 Cobra



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04 PM.