vs. 470 hp 03 Cobra
#32
RE: vs. 470 hp 03 Cobra
ORIGINAL: shibby
unheard of....really?
the bottle was almost empty and surging when I hit it and the it finally let out around 4300 rpm...I firmly believe in nitrous....that's not even the best dyno sheet I have...I have a four position chip...let's just say that's position 2....position one is an NA tune....position 3 and 4 make more power than this sheet...
unheard of....really?
the bottle was almost empty and surging when I hit it and the it finally let out around 4300 rpm...I firmly believe in nitrous....that's not even the best dyno sheet I have...I have a four position chip...let's just say that's position 2....position one is an NA tune....position 3 and 4 make more power than this sheet...
a. your setting someone up bigtime
b. Your totally BSin
c. You are intentionall leaving off stuff on your webpage.
If you are making torque like this for real, on a non bs dyno (one that acutally shows your full RPM band) then you are sure as hell making a CRAPLOAD more horsepower. 414 at 4600? What are we talking here, close to 500 (at least) at 6K? Im thinking more like 550ish. I gotta assume with the cams your horsepower doesnt fall off one bit (but keeps climbing) right to 6K (mine did).
If your running anywhere near the #s you should be this dyno is leading to, or your simply making 589 Lb/Ft at ANY rpm, your gonna break something for 100 percent sure on stock internals.
NO WAY a stock 2v setup on the bottom end can handle power levels like this for long. Prepare to slide a piston clean out of the block.
#33
RE: vs. 470 hp 03 Cobra
ORIGINAL: shibby
that would be right if I was spraying the car in those runs...but I wasn't....weight has ALOT to do with it....whether all the haters want to believe that or not...
that would be right if I was spraying the car in those runs...but I wasn't....weight has ALOT to do with it....whether all the haters want to believe that or not...
Also, an email from rearseatdelete.com states that "The weight savings with the plain rsd kit whether it has a logo or not, is between 40-45"(pounds).
#34
RE: vs. 470 hp 03 Cobra
ORIGINAL: shibby
my RTs run from single digits to .020s...
60's on those Pepboy street tires are between 1.8s and 1.9s
my RTs run from single digits to .020s...
60's on those Pepboy street tires are between 1.8s and 1.9s
I am sorry, but i simply have a very hard time beileving a N/A, non fully built GT (no headwork, no intake), even with 600 pounds of weight reduction, is gonna hand a blown cobra its ***, espcially one with drag radials. Hell, I dont think a fully built GT would be able to do this, even with a good 325-335 RWHP, you still shouldnt be cutting a 12.00
290 HP vs 425+ HP, the numbers just dont add up.
#37
RE: vs. 470 hp 03 Cobra
ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6
What in gods name is going on here. I am starting to think either :
a. your setting someone up bigtime
b. Your totally BSin
c. You are intentionall leaving off stuff on your webpage.
If you are making torque like this for real, on a non bs dyno (one that acutally shows your full RPM band) then you are sure as hell making a CRAPLOAD more horsepower. 414 at 4600? What are we talking here, close to 500 (at least) at 6K? Im thinking more like 550ish. I gotta assume with the cams your horsepower doesnt fall off one bit (but keeps climbing) right to 6K (mine did).
If your running anywhere near the #s you should be this dyno is leading to, or your simply making 589 Lb/Ft at ANY rpm, your gonna break something for 100 percent sure on stock internals.
NO WAY a stock 2v setup on the bottom end can handle power levels like this for long. Prepare to slide a piston clean out of the block.
ORIGINAL: shibby
unheard of....really?
the bottle was almost empty and surging when I hit it and the it finally let out around 4300 rpm...I firmly believe in nitrous....that's not even the best dyno sheet I have...I have a four position chip...let's just say that's position 2....position one is an NA tune....position 3 and 4 make more power than this sheet...
unheard of....really?
the bottle was almost empty and surging when I hit it and the it finally let out around 4300 rpm...I firmly believe in nitrous....that's not even the best dyno sheet I have...I have a four position chip...let's just say that's position 2....position one is an NA tune....position 3 and 4 make more power than this sheet...
a. your setting someone up bigtime
b. Your totally BSin
c. You are intentionall leaving off stuff on your webpage.
If you are making torque like this for real, on a non bs dyno (one that acutally shows your full RPM band) then you are sure as hell making a CRAPLOAD more horsepower. 414 at 4600? What are we talking here, close to 500 (at least) at 6K? Im thinking more like 550ish. I gotta assume with the cams your horsepower doesnt fall off one bit (but keeps climbing) right to 6K (mine did).
If your running anywhere near the #s you should be this dyno is leading to, or your simply making 589 Lb/Ft at ANY rpm, your gonna break something for 100 percent sure on stock internals.
NO WAY a stock 2v setup on the bottom end can handle power levels like this for long. Prepare to slide a piston clean out of the block.
#40
RE: vs. 470 hp 03 Cobra
ORIGINAL: OUZBnd
He said he was doing this
ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6
What in gods name is going on here. I am starting to think either :
a. your setting someone up bigtime
b. Your totally BSin
c. You are intentionall leaving off stuff on your webpage.
If you are making torque like this for real, on a non bs dyno (one that acutally shows your full RPM band) then you are sure as hell making a CRAPLOAD more horsepower. 414 at 4600? What are we talking here, close to 500 (at least) at 6K? Im thinking more like 550ish. I gotta assume with the cams your horsepower doesnt fall off one bit (but keeps climbing) right to 6K (mine did).
If your running anywhere near the #s you should be this dyno is leading to, or your simply making 589 Lb/Ft at ANY rpm, your gonna break something for 100 percent sure on stock internals.
NO WAY a stock 2v setup on the bottom end can handle power levels like this for long. Prepare to slide a piston clean out of the block.
What in gods name is going on here. I am starting to think either :
a. your setting someone up bigtime
b. Your totally BSin
c. You are intentionall leaving off stuff on your webpage.
If you are making torque like this for real, on a non bs dyno (one that acutally shows your full RPM band) then you are sure as hell making a CRAPLOAD more horsepower. 414 at 4600? What are we talking here, close to 500 (at least) at 6K? Im thinking more like 550ish. I gotta assume with the cams your horsepower doesnt fall off one bit (but keeps climbing) right to 6K (mine did).
If your running anywhere near the #s you should be this dyno is leading to, or your simply making 589 Lb/Ft at ANY rpm, your gonna break something for 100 percent sure on stock internals.
NO WAY a stock 2v setup on the bottom end can handle power levels like this for long. Prepare to slide a piston clean out of the block.
And I said he was doing that. You guys are hatin' big time, but like I said, you like facts and figures, too. So shibby, if you're not going to post a slip, you gotta take the heat.
Not that it would matter anyway, I guess. All it looks like that would accomplish would be outing yourself, because someone would prolly call that BS too. You post a dyno sheet and immediately someone calls it bs because it doesn't jive with what they are used to. Typical.
ORIGINAL: jdaniel
I said the same thing. Im launching at 3500-4500 on Nittos and pulling a 1.8 60'. There is no way in hell you can be doing it on street tires. Sorry buddy... I aint believing it either.
I said the same thing. Im launching at 3500-4500 on Nittos and pulling a 1.8 60'. There is no way in hell you can be doing it on street tires. Sorry buddy... I aint believing it either.