Mustang Videos This forum is for video's pertaining to Racing (Street/Strip), Interviews, Mustangs, and Off Topic.

3v ALREADY in the nines!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2005, 03:49 AM
  #11  
98gt0311
1st Gear Member
 
98gt0311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 69
Default RE: 3v ALREADY in the nines!!!

Just checked out suttonhp.com. My mistake man. Thats pretty badass. Thats friggin cool as hell that they are already offering head work on those things.

Anyone know what the bottom end can handle on one?
98gt0311 is offline  
Old 08-27-2005, 06:18 AM
  #12  
93StangLX
2nd Gear Member
 
93StangLX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 446
Default RE: 3v ALREADY in the nines!!!


ORIGINAL: nanaki

ORIGINAL: pro5.0stang

my girlfriend just saw that and then jerked me off
she just jerked me off too.

and dont forget me after nanaki....
93StangLX is offline  
Old 08-27-2005, 07:33 PM
  #13  
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Cackilacky
Posts: 8,635
Default RE: 3v ALREADY in the nines!!!


ORIGINAL: turbostang21

no it's definitley a 3v, go to suttonhp.com. it was the fastest 3v with 10.10 @ 133 before. the first 05 in the 9s was Robin Lawrence's which had a pushrod 5.0 motor
PUSHROD!!! No way! Pushrods are so outdated and SLOW! I can't believe that NHRA hasn't switched to to mod motors! Must be b/c they don't want to go too fast.
98LS1 is offline  
Old 08-27-2005, 08:36 PM
  #14  
01GTvertible
3rd Gear Member
 
01GTvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location:
Posts: 764
Default RE: 3v ALREADY in the nines!!!

thats sweet!!!
01GTvertible is offline  
Old 08-27-2005, 09:55 PM
  #15  
fnkyscotty
2nd Gear Member
 
fnkyscotty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location:
Posts: 177
Default RE: 3v ALREADY in the nines!!!

that was pretty sweet...
fnkyscotty is offline  
Old 08-29-2005, 01:07 AM
  #16  
5.0coupe
3rd Gear Member
 
5.0coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 633
Default RE: 3v ALREADY in the nines!!!

i love the 05's they look damn good and there build quality has gone up. now just supercharge that bitc*!!!!
5.0coupe is offline  
Old 08-29-2005, 04:48 PM
  #17  
99saleen351r
4th Gear Member
 
99saleen351r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Assachusetts
Posts: 1,899
Default RE: 3v ALREADY in the nines!!!

Like i said before you need a real blower not a KB to go fast.....Are you sure thats not the car with the cobra motor and a YSI it sure looks like it



ORIGINAL: turbostang21

no it's definitley a 3v, go to suttonhp.com. it was the fastest 3v with 10.10 @ 133 before. the first 05 in the 9s was Robin Lawrence's which had a pushrod 5.0 motor


PUSHROD!!! No way! Pushrods are so outdated and SLOW! I can't believe that NHRA hasn't switched to to mod motors! Must be b/c they don't want to go too fast

Now 98,you have to be jokin [8D]
99saleen351r is offline  
Old 08-29-2005, 07:43 PM
  #18  
2000GT4.6
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
2000GT4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
Default RE: 3v ALREADY in the nines!!!


ORIGINAL: 99saleen351r

Like i said before you need a real blower not a KB to go fast.....Are you sure thats not the car with the cobra motor and a YSI it sure looks like it



ORIGINAL: turbostang21

no it's definitley a 3v, go to suttonhp.com. it was the fastest 3v with 10.10 @ 133 before. the first 05 in the 9s was Robin Lawrence's which had a pushrod 5.0 motor


PUSHROD!!! No way! Pushrods are so outdated and SLOW! I can't believe that NHRA hasn't switched to to mod motors! Must be b/c they don't want to go too fast

Now 98,you have to be jokin [8D]
It is the 3v motor. It has been in several magazines and its what the friggin vid says anyways.

I don't think the NHRA has much choice, as there isn't a OHC motor that I know of that displaces more than what, 3xx cubes???

Like it or not, I don't think anyone sees the pushrod engine making a big comeback in production cars. They are more fuel efficent, on average are more powerful per cubic inch, and they are able to rev to higher RPM with componets that still allow the car to be affordable.

Imagine the horsepower numbers GM could get with a high reving 350 DOHC. Everyone is so crazy over the new LS2, hell ford had a 5.4 making 390 HP back in 2000! (cobra R anyone?)
2000GT4.6 is offline  
Old 08-30-2005, 11:09 AM
  #19  
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
98LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Cackilacky
Posts: 8,635
Default RE: 3v ALREADY in the nines!!!


ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6

It is the 3v motor. It has been in several magazines and its what the friggin vid says anyways.

I don't think the NHRA has much choice, as there isn't a OHC motor that I know of that displaces more than what, 3xx cubes???

Like it or not, I don't think anyone sees the pushrod engine making a big comeback in production cars. They are more fuel efficent, on average are more powerful per cubic inch, and they are able to rev to higher RPM with componets that still allow the car to be affordable.

Imagine the horsepower numbers GM could get with a high reving 350 DOHC. Everyone is so crazy over the new LS2, hell ford had a 5.4 making 390 HP back in 2000! (cobra R anyone?)
Our pushrod motors get better gas mileage, at least our LSx series motors. I drive mine around with a 4 speed, no OD, huge cam, and still get around 12-13mpg in all city driving. I haven't seen ANY built N/A OHC motors run worth a ****. This is namely Ford motors that I have witnessed. The 4V DOHC motors make a lot of power with any type of forced induction....but it still seems that the LSx pushrods make just as much at half the boost with only one cam and 16V.

The R is a specialty built race car. The LS2 is a run of the mill production motor. Much like the LS1 was. There is nothing "highly modifed" about either motors, that's left up to the consumer. Heads/cam LS2's are making 460+rwhp on a decently mild setup. A modified LS2 would be more comparable to the 5.4 that was in the R. As they're both modified, one from the factory, and one by the consumer.

Are there any Mach 1's out there making 400+rwhp on motor? Honestly, I've never seen one online, much less in person. As far as making more power per cubic inch.....wanna see what a heads/cam 5.0 liter LS1 can make?

http://www.lastofthebreed.com/Histor.../302Camaro.htm

Basically, I don't see how an OHC motor is better as a performance motor. The Terminator motor is the only thing even remotely compareable, and that's ONLY b/c it has forged internals from the factory. The only thing I'd like to see GM do is forge the bottom end.
98LS1 is offline  
Old 08-30-2005, 04:28 PM
  #20  
98gt0311
1st Gear Member
 
98gt0311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 69
Default RE: 3v ALREADY in the nines!!!

The OHC is plenty capable of making the same hp numbers as any pushrod. Research the 427 sohc. The only competition for it was that one engine with the hemispherical heads that Dodge made. What was that one called? OH The HEMI.

Look at the difference in cubes when comparing a Mach 1 to the LSx. Close to 70 cubes. Come on man. The pushrod is tried and true, nothing wrong with that. But compare apples to apples. I guess the run of the mill motors part is true but they are the last gen corvette engines. Ford developed the 4.6 with interchangability in mind. They put it in trucks and other cars. Is that the story w/ the LS? I guess my point is that if Ford sat down and developed a motor specifically for its highest performance platform w/ out the use of FI, I have confidence it would be right on par w/ ANY pushrod engine.

Honestly, Im not trying not to start ****. Id like to exchange ideas respectfully.
98gt0311 is offline  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 AM.