Softy from Australia new member
12-06-2013, 02:15 AM
#22
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Queensland -Australia
Posts: 16
Thanks again everyone for your kind words didn't know how people would reacted to having a ford falcon on a Mustang site which are kings in themselves 
,
Well it was released last night what we are getting here in OZ with the mustang and don't take it the wrong way but I think its very boring they already had a weapon mustang now going to get some 2015 half cut mustang
, one good thing is that we will get the coyote 5l thank fuc! and some eco boost 2.3l 4cyl 
Can someone send me a supersnake 5.8l s/c please
or Shelby gt 500
If you like to see some more of my GTP and bits and pieces will post a few pics just don't want to get kicked off the forum as its a Mustang forum I guess
so who has built coyote engines on here what rwhp are you guy's running I'm around 575rwhp soon to jump to 630rwhp on a standard engine but around 650/655 is max as the ring gaps fail but over all this is pretty impressive for a unopen engine but open them up go even more 
, Well it was released last night what we are getting here in OZ with the mustang and don't take it the wrong way but I think its very boring they already had a weapon mustang now going to get some 2015 half cut mustang
, one good thing is that we will get the coyote 5l thank fuc! and some eco boost 2.3l 4cyl Can someone send me a supersnake 5.8l s/c please
or Shelby gt 500 If you like to see some more of my GTP and bits and pieces will post a few pics just don't want to get kicked off the forum as its a Mustang forum I guess
so who has built coyote engines on here what rwhp are you guy's running I'm around 575rwhp soon to jump to 630rwhp on a standard engine but around 650/655 is max as the ring gaps fail but over all this is pretty impressive for a unopen engine but open them up go even more
12-06-2013, 08:44 AM
#23
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 177
No need to mourn the loss of the 5.8, it was and is an impressive engine for sure but the Coyote has proven to be a more than capable successor.
Look around a bit, there are Coyotes making 500whp+ N/A and running in the 10s and the sky is the limit with boost.
I'd also take a 2nd glance at that 2.3 turbo, while final numbers have not been released in stock form it will make the same or more horsepower and torque as a 4.6 3v but in a much lighter package.
That should make the four cylinder car the lightest, best handling of the bunch with the potential for quite a bit more power if wanted.
Ford actually has a pretty solid history with turbo fours, don't sell them short.
-Steve
Look around a bit, there are Coyotes making 500whp+ N/A and running in the 10s and the sky is the limit with boost.
I'd also take a 2nd glance at that 2.3 turbo, while final numbers have not been released in stock form it will make the same or more horsepower and torque as a 4.6 3v but in a much lighter package.
That should make the four cylinder car the lightest, best handling of the bunch with the potential for quite a bit more power if wanted.
Ford actually has a pretty solid history with turbo fours, don't sell them short.
-Steve
12-11-2013, 07:30 AM
#24
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Queensland -Australia
Posts: 16
Lol I wont mate I have seen some tuff coyotes over there in the states T/Turbo rides that's something which is to hard to plum up to our falcons as there is limited room to play not like the mustangs (;
12-13-2013, 04:51 AM
#28
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Queensland -Australia
Posts: 16
