Pipes, Boost & Juice Talk about Exhaust, Nitrous, Blowers, Turbos, Superchargers... whatever makes you go faster!

Wet or Dry Pro and Con

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2004, 03:52 AM
  #1  
Big5.0.13.7sec.
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Big5.0.13.7sec.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location:
Posts: 202
Default Wet or Dry Pro and Con

What is the diff b/t wet shot and a dry shot?

Horsepower?
Money?
Safety?
Simplicty of install?
Stress on engine?
Big5.0.13.7sec. is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 12:02 PM
  #2  
4fit?
4th Gear Member
 
4fit?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Graham, NC
Posts: 1,472
Default RE: Wet or Dry Pro and Con

1-Wet system intoduces a mixture of nitrous and fuel into the engine. Dry system only introduces nitrous and the additional fuel need is provided by the injectors by putting vacuum pressure on the fuel pressure regulator which effectively raises your fuel pressure.

2-Depends. I know guys running two stage dry setups all the way to a 400 shot. Wet systems also can generate extraordinary numbers. Most high horsepower racing applications that I know of are running dry kits.

3-You can get some wet kits for near the same price as dry kits, but this is the exception to the rule. For the most part, dry kits are less expensive.

4-Safety is entirely up to how you use it. ALl though, if you use a wet kit that introduces fuel and nitrous at the same time before the throttle body, you greatly increase your risk of nitrous backfires. This is because the 5.0 intake manifold was not designed to carry fuel and could lead to puddling within the intake.

5-Dry kit it easier to install. If you have everything that you need before you get started, you should be able to knock out a dry install in about 2 hours.

6-All depends on the tune. You definetely do not want to run lean. Just remember, any form of power adder is going to reduce the life span of your engine somewhat.
4fit? is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 12:13 PM
  #3  
mdvaldosta
I ♥ Acer
 
mdvaldosta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 8,826
Default RE: Wet or Dry Pro and Con

I'd use dry on a 5.0, just easier.
mdvaldosta is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 01:37 AM
  #4  
Obsol3te
6th Gear Member
 
Obsol3te's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,836
Default RE: Wet or Dry Pro and Con

Dry is easier to install, cheaper, and can be just as good as a wet kit.
But as 4fit said above, do NOT run a wet kit before the TB on a 302 engine
the intakes are screwy as all hell and fuel just aint sposta pass thru there
Obsol3te is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 03:22 AM
  #5  
94Cbra
4th Gear Member
 
94Cbra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southern Kentucky
Posts: 1,487
Default RE: Wet or Dry Pro and Con

Ive been looking into Wet Plate systems and they are very very simple to install. The cost is only about 50 dollars more too. It injects the mixture into the plate that fits between the Upper and lower intake manifolds. The system is called a "Big Shot" system from Holley (N.O.S.). Its good for 200-300 HP.
94Cbra is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 09:58 AM
  #6  
4fit?
4th Gear Member
 
4fit?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Graham, NC
Posts: 1,472
Default RE: Wet or Dry Pro and Con

ORIGINAL: 94Cbra

Ive been looking into Wet Plate systems and they are very very simple to install. The cost is only about 50 dollars more too. It injects the mixture into the plate that fits between the Upper and lower intake manifolds. The system is called a "Big Shot" system from Holley (N.O.S.). Its good for 200-300 HP.
Those are great systems.
4fit? is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 03:01 PM
  #7  
Obsol3te
6th Gear Member
 
Obsol3te's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,836
Default RE: Wet or Dry Pro and Con

Yes, but they look HORRIBLY restrictive when not on the juice...
Just look at the design, takes up most of the runner leaving barely anything...
Obsol3te is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 03:36 PM
  #8  
94Cbra
4th Gear Member
 
94Cbra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southern Kentucky
Posts: 1,487
Default RE: Wet or Dry Pro and Con

Yes it does look restrictive, thats one issue I was looking into with that kit.
94Cbra is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 04:13 PM
  #9  
4fit?
4th Gear Member
 
4fit?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Graham, NC
Posts: 1,472
Default RE: Wet or Dry Pro and Con

ORIGINAL: Obsol3te

Yes, but they look HORRIBLY restrictive when not on the juice...
Just look at the design, takes up most of the runner leaving barely anything...
That is true. Most of the guys I see running those kits have pretty much track-only cars. But they can produce some unbelievable numbers.
4fit? is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 04:20 PM
  #10  
Obsol3te
6th Gear Member
 
Obsol3te's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,836
Default RE: Wet or Dry Pro and Con

Well, wouldn't the track only guys benefit more from the Fogger System?
Obsol3te is offline  


Quick Reply: Wet or Dry Pro and Con



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 PM.