The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Speed Zone > Street/Strip
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-14-2008, 10:33 PM   #1
2000AZ5.0GT
5th Gear Member
2000 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Vehicle: 2000 Ford Mustang GT
Posts: 3,389
Default DSM Vehicles

So not that I want to race them, but I've noticed a couple DSM guys hang out in this section, so I wanted to see what was up. The other day, I was driving around one, his music was blaring, and he heard the whine/whistle from my car, and I think he wanted to go.

He kept speeding up under boost, and I could hear the wastegate. Sounded great, but everytime he got on it, there was a puff of black smoke coming out from his tailpipe, so he was running rich. I've seen a couple other turbo DSM's in town when they were under boost or got on it, and they all seem to do the same exact thing.

I've never researched it, but with a DSM, do most enthusiasts go to an FMU whe they turbo it? That would explain the little puff of black smoke (poor tuning essentially), if not, why do they all run so rich?

assuming he was running 300-400whp, I'm assuming they are AWD, are they capable of decent ET's or times around a track? Or are they pretty much just quick street cars?

what kind of reliability do they see?

(I'm just interested in leaning about these little buggers, they seem to have some pep to them)
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdot9 View Post
i could go for a nice can of cock rite now actually...
2000AZ5.0GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2008, 11:03 PM   #2
perfect.disguise
4th Gear Member
2007 Chevrolet Cobalt
 
perfect.disguise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Vehicle: 07 SS/SC
Location: VA
Posts: 1,028
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2000AZ5.0GT View Post
I'm assuming they are AWD, are they capable of decent ET's or times around a track? Or are they pretty much just quick street cars?
DSM as far as Talon's and Eclipse's vary (I will exclude the Laser).The turbo engine (4g63T) same engine as in the Lancer Evolution 1-9 (though not exactly the same in the DSM's) has good potential though many have problems with crankwalk.There is also a few N/A engines (4g37, 4g63, 420A, 4g64). The only ones that are AWD is the GSX and the TSI AWD, the rest being FWD. I used to have a 97 GST (FWD Turbo) and it was actually pretty quick and easy to get power from.
__________________
07 SS/SC 274whp 7400RPM RL,2.8,60's,Ported/polished/Plugged SC,Plugs/Tune,3" intake,Vibrant Header/downpipe,Magnaflow Catback,Stage 3 Heat Exchanger..I haz torque.
92 EG Hatch
perfect.disguise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2008, 11:11 PM   #3
2000AZ5.0GT
5th Gear Member
2000 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Vehicle: 2000 Ford Mustang GT
Posts: 3,389
Default

now if they are completely shaved (the ones in town that I've seen only say Turbo, and the body work is insanely good), how do you tell what they are? I mean are there any clues as to whether or not they are a TSI?
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdot9 View Post
i could go for a nice can of cock rite now actually...
2000AZ5.0GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2008, 11:51 PM   #4
drhoward
5th Gear Member
1994 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
drhoward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicle: 1994 Mustang Super Special Hooker Edition GT
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 3,232
Default

You will see it broken down on the side of the road, then you know its a TSi
__________________
1994 Mustang GT
My Porsche makes me better than you
www.cardomain.com/id/bigshirtlesspete

Quote:
Originally Posted by redass02gt View Post
even if I had balls, I wouldn't know what to do with them.
drhoward is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2008, 12:57 AM   #5
97tplsGT
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Posts: 1,134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drhoward View Post
You will see it broken down on the side of the road, then you know its a TSi
LOL, I was waiting for that one. Thats all Ive ever heard about these eclipses and talons, you spend more time fixing then driving....
__________________
'07 Dodge Ram-QuadCab, stock 4.7L,k&n,DIY "cai", 40series, 35/5% tint,Type R 10's,1000w amp,Mopar foglights,HIDs heads/fogs (His)
'04 Durango Limited- Stock 5.7L Hemi, 40series (Hers) 10.44 @ 68

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baddog View Post
BluebeastSRT's car would eat a car like mine and after doing so, sh$t out a car like yours.
97tplsGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2008, 01:04 AM   #6
perfect.disguise
4th Gear Member
2007 Chevrolet Cobalt
 
perfect.disguise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Vehicle: 07 SS/SC
Location: VA
Posts: 1,028
Default

Not sure about first gens. I think as far as Eclipses 95-96 the muffler was dual tipped and the emblems.97-99 turbo models came with the high rise, dual tip muffler, and I think the GSX had GSX specific wheels.Isn't that much diff exterior wise. Some of the cheaper models didn't have skirts and whatnot and the Spyder wasn't avaliable in a GSX. Not sure about Talons I'm pretty sure the "high rise" was an option for the ESI aswell. My GST had over 114,000 reliable miles on it though many have problems.
__________________
07 SS/SC 274whp 7400RPM RL,2.8,60's,Ported/polished/Plugged SC,Plugs/Tune,3" intake,Vibrant Header/downpipe,Magnaflow Catback,Stage 3 Heat Exchanger..I haz torque.
92 EG Hatch
perfect.disguise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2008, 01:53 AM   #7
jakeachy
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Vehicle: 2000 Subaru MONSTER
Location: CF,WI
Posts: 973
Default

guys, how can you be this ignorant?
crankwalk was not very common, and it only happened to 95/96.
They get their bad name and rep from their white trash drivers... no maintenance, just beat on it all day.

You put 2k into a stock awd dsm, and then put 2k into a fox, evo, wrx,f body,etc and the dsm will always be faster. Cheap for fast, but they are seriously junky cars.
__________________
2000 Impreza 3.3L Flat 6 rally machine.
1995 Impreza 2.2L Flat 4 Daily cutie.
jakeachy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2008, 02:24 AM   #8
cacimar
5th Gear Member
 
cacimar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: delray beach, florida
Posts: 2,690
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jakeachy View Post
guys, how can you be this ignorant?
crankwalk was not very common, and it only happened to 95/96.
They get their bad name and rep from their white trash drivers... no maintenance, just beat on it all day.

You put 2k into a stock awd dsm, and then put 2k into a fox, evo, wrx,f body,etc and the dsm will always be faster. Cheap for fast, but they are seriously junky cars.

why exactly, what is so special about the dsm that would make them faster than rest mod for mod ?
__________________
04 SRT: 50 trim + supporting mods running only 20 PSI
cacimar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2008, 02:24 AM   #9
2000AZ5.0GT
5th Gear Member
2000 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Vehicle: 2000 Ford Mustang GT
Posts: 3,389
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by perfect.disguise View Post
Not sure about first gens. I think as far as Eclipses 95-96 the muffler was dual tipped and the emblems.97-99 turbo models came with the high rise, dual tip muffler, and I think the GSX had GSX specific wheels.Isn't that much diff exterior wise. Some of the cheaper models didn't have skirts and whatnot and the Spyder wasn't avaliable in a GSX. Not sure about Talons I'm pretty sure the "high rise" was an option for the ESI aswell. My GST had over 114,000 reliable miles on it though many have problems.

Both of the ones that I've seen had one muffler, not a fart can, and they sound really mean, especially for a four cylinder.

Both of them are very understaded. Actually one has turbo written on the trunk, but that's about it. Other than that, no badging, nothing. Like I said, great body work.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdot9 View Post
i could go for a nice can of cock rite now actually...
2000AZ5.0GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2008, 02:35 AM   #10
tspence45
4th Gear Member
1998 Pontiac Trans Am
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Monmouth, IL
Posts: 1,583
Default

Reliability is a major issue with those cars. I think it's mostly just the ricer croud that cheaps out on parts and don't really do a whole lot of maintenance though. I really wouldn't mind one. I almost bought a '92 TSI AWD 5speed for winter, then do some modding in the spring, but the guy had sold it by the time I got ahold of him. The good thing is that they're cheap, and cheap to make very fast.
__________________

98 Trans Am M6 bolt-ons and a rod knock (H/C/I 6.0 coming for Spring)
http://www.cardomain.com/id/tspence45
tspence45 is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company