Notices
S550 2015-2023 Mustang Discussions on the S550 2015 - 2022 Ford Mustang.

Comments on the 2015 styling? Here is the thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-2014, 07:13 PM
  #51  
LordRipberger
3rd Gear Member
 
LordRipberger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Jasper, IN
Posts: 772
Default

They should have kept the tailights and hood vents from the last model. The tail lights look out-dated already and un-creative. The last gens were amazing looking.
LordRipberger is offline  
Old 01-05-2014, 12:46 PM
  #52  
aode08
5th Gear Member
 
aode08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ohio USA
Posts: 4,616
Default

I'm upset for two reasons

1.A retractable top model is not an option.

2.The same guy that does the exterior design, does the interior design.The interior sucks *****


I like the power output and engine options.
aode08 is offline  
Old 01-06-2014, 12:27 AM
  #53  
whosniffedme
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
whosniffedme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 639
Default

Originally Posted by aode08
I'm upset for two reasons

1.A retractable top model is not an option.

2.The same guy that does the exterior design, does the interior design.The interior sucks *****


I like the power output and engine options.
I agree, the interior is just cluttered with buttons and the base model is a little bland compared to other cars in the category. I've never been a rag top fan but I didn't know that, I'm sure plenty of people wanted a convertible.

The available motors are definitely impressive, although we haven't seen them all running yet. I'm not going to argue the car will a beast, but an ugly beast to me...
whosniffedme is offline  
Old 01-06-2014, 04:13 AM
  #54  
Mr. D
4th Gear Member
 
Mr. D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,149
Default

I want to go on record thanking Ford for the 2015 Mustang!

After comparing my 2008 Mustang to the 2015 Mustang Ford just saved me a lot of money! I hope the Europeans like it, because I think it is a step backward! It will likely drive great, but it is almost not a Mustang anymore! But then look what Ford did to the original Thunderbird! Look at a '57 T-Bird and look at the last Thunderturd! Embarrassing!

I wonder if there would be a market for a '57 Thunderbird with a supercharged 5.0 L and upgraded mechanicals & electronics! Sign me up for one right now!

Old Mr. D
Mr. D is offline  
Old 01-06-2014, 04:57 AM
  #55  
lpcard
4th Gear Member
 
lpcard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Franklinton, NC
Posts: 1,692
Default

Originally Posted by MustangInTexas
If you don't like the skinny headlights, how do you ever look at a New Edge? We've had 'em before. I like the car. No, it doesn't look like the current model. It's not supposed to.

And, now just to give you nightmares, I give you the Fustang...

this is so wrong...on so many levels...
lpcard is offline  
Old 01-06-2014, 05:04 AM
  #56  
lpcard
4th Gear Member
 
lpcard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Franklinton, NC
Posts: 1,692
Default

Originally Posted by JimC
I remember when the 2011 came out and everyone hated the taillights. We were at the track and someone came in with a new 5.0, rolled it out of the trailer with the window sticker still on it. Lined it up and ran in the mid 12's. One of my friends turned and said "you know, I'm liking those taillights more and more now!"
I wasn't too crazy about the tail either, I liked the 05-09 better. But then I realized...I don't see the tail from the drivers seat...and that 412 hp 5.0 engine made up for a lot of ills.

As far as the new cars go, I wish they had kept some of the old styling cues and I'm not over the top about some of the new ones, but overall it's not a bad looking package. I think it will grow on us.
lpcard is offline  
Old 01-06-2014, 06:57 AM
  #57  
steev
2nd Gear Member
 
steev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 272
Default

Oh, Mr. D.

The Thunderbird of the early 2000s was a problem because it was a really bad retro-modern design. If Ford didn't have to buckle to the beancounters and were able to put in the Independent Rear Suspension that they designed the S197 with from the start, then I'd be more inclined to agree with you.

Instead, I think that a 2016 Mustang GT in 2018 might be a car to upgrade to. Because Ford wasn't comparing this car against a Camaro but chassis like the 3 series coupe.

I'm sure you'll remember the original Mustang had 'european' styling, and as you said before, even the V8 was seen as a secretary's car by your peers back then.
steev is offline  
Old 01-07-2014, 04:26 AM
  #58  
AK_Kayaker
3rd Gear Member
 
AK_Kayaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 987
Default

Originally Posted by aode08
I'm upset for two reasons

1.A retractable top model is not an option.

2.The same guy that does the exterior design, does the interior design.The interior sucks *****


I like the power output and engine options.
I'm not sure were you get your info, but ford still shows a ragtop on the 2015 page, and I for one like the interior,
especially with the dual gauges replacing the center vent option.

And according to Ford just cause they are going to sell them globally, they did not try to cater to the world market,
which is a lot more than just Europe.

And rumor has it they will offer a solid rear in the body in white track cars, which could easily lead to a Ford Racing conversion kit,
but that is still just a rumor.
And as always Ford please give us a better blue, Vista would be fine.
AK_Kayaker is offline  
Old 01-07-2014, 04:52 AM
  #59  
Mr. D
4th Gear Member
 
Mr. D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,149
Default

Originally Posted by steev
Oh, Mr. D.

The Thunderbird of the early 2000s was a problem because it was a really bad retro-modern design. If Ford didn't have to buckle to the beancounters and were able to put in the Independent Rear Suspension that they designed the S197 with from the start, then I'd be more inclined to agree with you.

Instead, I think that a 2016 Mustang GT in 2018 might be a car to upgrade to. Because Ford wasn't comparing this car against a Camaro but chassis like the 3 series coupe.

I'm sure you'll remember the original Mustang had 'european' styling, and as you said before, even the V8 was seen as a secretary's car by your peers back then.
Agreed! But.... you mean you couldn't enjoy having a '57 T-Bird with modern (hidden away upgrades) and a supercharged 5.0L. & 6 Speed tranny! I don't believe that!
Mr. D is offline  
Old 01-07-2014, 05:36 AM
  #60  
JimC
Moderator
 
JimC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Michigan again!
Posts: 8,579
Default

Originally Posted by aode08
I'm upset for two reasons

1.A retractable top model is not an option.
Originally Posted by AK_Kayaker
I'm not sure were you get your info, but ford still shows a ragtop on the 2015 page,
I think that what he means is a retractable HARD top, rather than a traditional convertible.
JimC is offline  


Quick Reply: Comments on the 2015 styling? Here is the thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 AM.