V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs Technical discussions on the 3.8L and 3.9L V6 torque monsters

Stock V6 1/4 time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2009, 01:30 PM
  #1  
haystackstang
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
haystackstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ca
Posts: 490
Default Stock V6 1/4 time

for the sn95s?
haystackstang is offline  
Old 06-29-2009, 01:46 PM
  #2  
brent4
4th Gear Member
 
brent4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,605
Default

The non new edges run like 0-60= 9.9 1/4=17.3
brent4 is offline  
Old 06-29-2009, 01:49 PM
  #3  
haystackstang
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
haystackstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ca
Posts: 490
Default

Originally Posted by brent4
The non new edges run like 0-60= 9.9 1/4=17.3
thank u
haystackstang is offline  
Old 06-29-2009, 06:55 PM
  #4  
JKs95stang
4th Gear Member
 
JKs95stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,530
Default

Yup, that's about right, if you can drive, 16.9 maybe 17 flat.
JKs95stang is offline  
Old 06-29-2009, 08:20 PM
  #5  
Synyster06Gates
4th Gear Member
 
Synyster06Gates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,130
Default

What were the New Edges?
Synyster06Gates is offline  
Old 06-29-2009, 09:14 PM
  #6  
moontang
4th Gear Member
 
moontang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: rockwell/charlotte NC
Posts: 1,451
Default

99+ were sn95 new edge
moontang is offline  
Old 06-29-2009, 09:14 PM
  #7  
Shaunmac9128
6th Gear Member
 
Shaunmac9128's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: RI
Posts: 5,453
Default

Lol your body style is a new edge before that, haystacks body style were called SN95's. But yeah, it's scary to think they were 17 second cars...not that the new edges are/were that much better
Shaunmac9128 is offline  
Old 06-29-2009, 09:57 PM
  #8  
jthorn9
The Godfather
 
jthorn9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Temple, Texas
Posts: 15,481
Default

A 94-98 V6 manual with a good driver and decent track conditions can push to the mid to low 16s, but that's about tops for them.

Hey look at the bright side, the 94-98 V6s were light years ahead of the 87-93 2.3L engines lol.
jthorn9 is offline  
Old 06-29-2009, 10:30 PM
  #9  
Stangcharger
 
Stangcharger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 33
Default

Originally Posted by Shaunmac9128
Lol your body style is a new edge before that, haystacks body style were called SN95's. But yeah, it's scary to think they were 17 second cars...not that the new edges are/were that much better
99+ 5 speeds were 15.5. that isnt that bad considering a stock 5.0L is around a 15.0.
Stangcharger is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:43 PM
  #10  
Synyster06Gates
4th Gear Member
 
Synyster06Gates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,130
Default

Originally Posted by Shaunmac9128
Lol your body style is a new edge before that, haystacks body style were called SN95's. But yeah, it's scary to think they were 17 second cars...not that the new edges are/were that much better
Haha i knew that but i was asking about new edge times.
Synyster06Gates is offline  


Quick Reply: Stock V6 1/4 time



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 PM.