stupid question
but um, is there a weight to reduce weight on the engine itself? such as head, internals, etc, i'm trying to get the perfect 50/50 weight ratio for handling, and i know someone is going to say "just relocate the battery" or "get a lightweight k member" etc, but can anyone answer this question ^
ps, are the tubular kmembers as rigid as the stock ones?
ps, are the tubular kmembers as rigid as the stock ones?
i'll take a stab at this lol
no. there is no practical (and feasable) weight reducing
action to do to your existing engine.
i think it would be more cost effective to add a s/c, then add some
weight in the trunk, if you must attain that 50/50 ratio
no. there is no practical (and feasable) weight reducing
action to do to your existing engine.
i think it would be more cost effective to add a s/c, then add some
weight in the trunk, if you must attain that 50/50 ratio
The ls1 is so light because it has a piece of **** unibody gm garbage frame. I have seen plent of gm cars with frame problems due to the under strength frames. If you ever get to see a firebird with its front fenders off you will see what I mean it has zero support up front.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
3
Oct 2, 2015 08:06 AM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
Oct 1, 2015 09:21 AM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
Sep 28, 2015 07:03 AM




