Ducktail... Cervini or CDC?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

May 1, 2007 | 02:06 PM

#11

cvz_finezt

2nd Gear Member

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 269

From: Phoenix, AZ

RE: Ducktail... Cervini or CDC?

u dont need the 3rd brake light to be legal. i got a CDC on mine and i havent been pulled over or nothing reguarding my 3rd brake light not beeing visible. most people think it's stock.

May 1, 2007 | 02:20 PM

#12

guydon

2nd Gear Member

Joined: Apr 2007

Posts: 384

From: WA

RE: Ducktail... Cervini or CDC?

I really like the Cervinis duck tail!

May 1, 2007 | 02:32 PM

#13

bl1nk

5th Gear Member

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 3,881

From: Florida

RE: Ducktail... Cervini or CDC?

Quote:

ORIGINAL: cvz_finezt

u dont need the 3rd brake light to be legal. i got a CDC on mine and i havent been pulled over or nothing reguarding my 3rd brake light not beeing visible. most people think it's stock.

Well Im glad you havent been pulled over, but that doesnt mean youre not running illegally. It is a federal law that a 3rd brake light is required, every since like.. 1986 or something. All cars must come equipped with a functional 3rd brake light that is not allowed to be covered in any way. Even having tint over the 3rd brake light is illegal. If you ever got in a wreck where someone hit you from behind and they said they couldnt see you braking, you would be held responsible for the wreck, even though they rearended you. Now you may be willing to live with that, and thats fine because its your car, but please... its not legal, dont tell other people it is.