2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

bad @$$ end

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 20, 2005 | 05:56 PM
  #1  
silverbullit05's Avatar
silverbullit05
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 233
From:
Default bad @$$ end

why didn't they keep this back end i think it looks awsome!
Old Mar 20, 2005 | 06:38 PM
  #2  
DAVE05GT's Avatar
DAVE05GT
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 495
From:
Default RE: bad @$$ end

COST, MOST LIKELY. I DOUBT THATS PLASTIC LIKE THE PRODUCTION 05S AROUND THE TAIL PIPES BECAUSE IT LOOKS LIKE IT WOULD MELT IF IT WAS, BUT JUST MY 2 CENTS. THAT IS ONE BAD @$$ REAR FACIA THOUGH.
Old Mar 20, 2005 | 06:39 PM
  #3  
SpikeGT's Avatar
SpikeGT
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 395
From:
Default RE: bad @$$ end

I don't know why they didn't use it, but that is a picture of the concept car. i have the 1:18 scale die-cast model of that exact car on my desk. that might be a picture of a model. it is awesome looking though.
Old Mar 20, 2005 | 06:46 PM
  #4  
Redfire's Avatar
Redfire
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 516
From:
Default RE: bad @$$ end

Yeah it looks great, but I think they were tryin to make the new Stang look more like the old ones. Ya have to admit, the tailights they did use look more like the old Stangs than that Fururistic setup.
Old Mar 20, 2005 | 07:11 PM
  #5  
281GT's Avatar
281GT
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 864
From:
Default RE: bad @$$ end

I agree that the concept car's tail looks pretty good but I like the production model just as much. I think the production model is a little more retro. Probaly less expensive to build also. I think Ford did an amazing job on the mechanicals of the car and too me that's what really counts. Just my 2 cents.
Old Mar 20, 2005 | 09:08 PM
  #6  
dan's Avatar
dan
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,447
From:
Default RE: bad @$$ end


ORIGINAL: DAVE05GT

COST, MOST LIKELY. I DOUBT THATS PLASTIC LIKE THE PRODUCTION 05S AROUND THE TAIL PIPES BECAUSE IT LOOKS LIKE IT WOULD MELT IF IT WAS, BUT JUST MY 2 CENTS. THAT IS ONE BAD @$$ REAR FACIA THOUGH.
Old Mar 20, 2005 | 09:32 PM
  #7  
JC74's Avatar
JC74
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 190
From:
Default RE: bad @$$ end

Lol, damn Dan, your point threw off the entire page view. (nice macro shot).
Old Mar 20, 2005 | 09:56 PM
  #8  
Aixtreme89's Avatar
Aixtreme89
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,034
From:
Default RE: bad @$$ end

I agree, I wish they used those concept tail lights on the production car. The ones they used look too much like the 99-04 mustangs. But I think they are going to put the tail lights from the concept car onto the upcoming cobra. along with the side air scoops. They are saving the best for the best. Or mabye they will put it on the GT500 if they make it.
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 11:47 AM
  #9  
graphicguy's Avatar
graphicguy
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 153
From:
Default RE: bad @$$ end

Got a really cool book from the dealer I ordered mine from. It's a hard back book with the title "A New Breed of Pony Car". It was written by one of the R&T editors. It speaks mostly about the '05 Mustang, but has some chapters on Mustang evolution over the years and a chapter about future Mustangs.

J. Mays, VP of Design for Ford is quoted in the book that he really wanted the tail lights of the concept car, but the rest of the design team thought it would have made the production version too "japanese". So they went with the more traditional Mustang tail lights as a statement that the '05 Mustang was "purely and Amercian design".

Interesting book that talks about all the design and performance elements and the debate that ensued within Ford to come up with what has turned out to be the final design. It's also clear in the book that Mays isn't a fan of extraneous, non-functional scoops and great big spoilers. That's why the current one doesn't have them. The only reason they said they didn't use the "ducktail" spoiler design was because they thought it looked silly on the convertible versions.

He also went on to say that "...the interior design is an excercise in simplicity....it's the muscle car interior that you remember (from earlier muscle cars)."

BTW....the same designer said that future Cobras would have to have a lot more HP in order for them to shave a couple of 10ths of 1/4 times....he said a minimum of 90-100 HP increase could be expected.

I don't know if the book can be bought at Borders, but it's author is Matt DeLorenzo. There's no price on it anywhere, but you may be able to get it through Ford as there's a sticker that says it's an "Ford Official Licensed Product".

Nice of my dealer to send it to me while I'm waiting for my car.
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 07:09 PM
  #10  
silverbullit05's Avatar
silverbullit05
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 233
From:
Default RE: bad @$$ end

wow graphicguy that is a score. i will look around for that. i do think that the production lights and rear look more traditional but i still like the look of the concept back end a little better. either way they both look good in my eyes.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mtgldr
S197 Handling Section
5
Feb 3, 2024 09:00 PM
67LimeCoupe
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
31
Sep 30, 2015 04:46 PM
Ryan Fitzpatrick
New Member Area
3
Sep 14, 2015 02:21 AM
fastbackford351
Classic Mustang General Discussion
2
Sep 12, 2015 09:42 AM
Dragonus18
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
8
Sep 9, 2015 01:21 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 PM.