Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

bad @$$ end

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-2005, 05:56 PM
  #1  
silverbullit05
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
silverbullit05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 233
Default bad @$$ end

why didn't they keep this back end i think it looks awsome!
silverbullit05 is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 06:38 PM
  #2  
DAVE05GT
2nd Gear Member
 
DAVE05GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 495
Default RE: bad @$$ end

COST, MOST LIKELY. I DOUBT THATS PLASTIC LIKE THE PRODUCTION 05S AROUND THE TAIL PIPES BECAUSE IT LOOKS LIKE IT WOULD MELT IF IT WAS, BUT JUST MY 2 CENTS. THAT IS ONE BAD @$$ REAR FACIA THOUGH.
DAVE05GT is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 06:39 PM
  #3  
SpikeGT
2nd Gear Member
 
SpikeGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 395
Default RE: bad @$$ end

I don't know why they didn't use it, but that is a picture of the concept car. i have the 1:18 scale die-cast model of that exact car on my desk. that might be a picture of a model. it is awesome looking though.
SpikeGT is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 06:46 PM
  #4  
Redfire
3rd Gear Member
 
Redfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 516
Default RE: bad @$$ end

Yeah it looks great, but I think they were tryin to make the new Stang look more like the old ones. Ya have to admit, the tailights they did use look more like the old Stangs than that Fururistic setup.
Redfire is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 07:11 PM
  #5  
281GT
3rd Gear Member
 
281GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 864
Default RE: bad @$$ end

I agree that the concept car's tail looks pretty good but I like the production model just as much. I think the production model is a little more retro. Probaly less expensive to build also. I think Ford did an amazing job on the mechanicals of the car and too me that's what really counts. Just my 2 cents.
281GT is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 09:08 PM
  #6  
dan
4th Gear Member
 
dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,447
Default RE: bad @$$ end


ORIGINAL: DAVE05GT

COST, MOST LIKELY. I DOUBT THATS PLASTIC LIKE THE PRODUCTION 05S AROUND THE TAIL PIPES BECAUSE IT LOOKS LIKE IT WOULD MELT IF IT WAS, BUT JUST MY 2 CENTS. THAT IS ONE BAD @$$ REAR FACIA THOUGH.
dan is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 09:32 PM
  #7  
JC74
2nd Gear Member
 
JC74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 190
Default RE: bad @$$ end

Lol, damn Dan, your point threw off the entire page view. (nice macro shot).
JC74 is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 09:56 PM
  #8  
Aixtreme89
5th Gear Member
 
Aixtreme89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,034
Default RE: bad @$$ end

I agree, I wish they used those concept tail lights on the production car. The ones they used look too much like the 99-04 mustangs. But I think they are going to put the tail lights from the concept car onto the upcoming cobra. along with the side air scoops. They are saving the best for the best. Or mabye they will put it on the GT500 if they make it.
Aixtreme89 is offline  
Old 03-21-2005, 11:47 AM
  #9  
graphicguy
2nd Gear Member
 
graphicguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 153
Default RE: bad @$$ end

Got a really cool book from the dealer I ordered mine from. It's a hard back book with the title "A New Breed of Pony Car". It was written by one of the R&T editors. It speaks mostly about the '05 Mustang, but has some chapters on Mustang evolution over the years and a chapter about future Mustangs.

J. Mays, VP of Design for Ford is quoted in the book that he really wanted the tail lights of the concept car, but the rest of the design team thought it would have made the production version too "japanese". So they went with the more traditional Mustang tail lights as a statement that the '05 Mustang was "purely and Amercian design".

Interesting book that talks about all the design and performance elements and the debate that ensued within Ford to come up with what has turned out to be the final design. It's also clear in the book that Mays isn't a fan of extraneous, non-functional scoops and great big spoilers. That's why the current one doesn't have them. The only reason they said they didn't use the "ducktail" spoiler design was because they thought it looked silly on the convertible versions.

He also went on to say that "...the interior design is an excercise in simplicity....it's the muscle car interior that you remember (from earlier muscle cars)."

BTW....the same designer said that future Cobras would have to have a lot more HP in order for them to shave a couple of 10ths of 1/4 times....he said a minimum of 90-100 HP increase could be expected.

I don't know if the book can be bought at Borders, but it's author is Matt DeLorenzo. There's no price on it anywhere, but you may be able to get it through Ford as there's a sticker that says it's an "Ford Official Licensed Product".

Nice of my dealer to send it to me while I'm waiting for my car.
graphicguy is offline  
Old 03-21-2005, 07:09 PM
  #10  
silverbullit05
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
silverbullit05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 233
Default RE: bad @$$ end

wow graphicguy that is a score. i will look around for that. i do think that the production lights and rear look more traditional but i still like the look of the concept back end a little better. either way they both look good in my eyes.
silverbullit05 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mtgldr
S197 Handling Section
5
02-03-2024 09:00 PM
67LimeCoupe
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
31
09-30-2015 04:46 PM
Ryan Fitzpatrick
New Member Area
3
09-14-2015 02:21 AM
fastbackford351
Classic Mustang General Discussion
2
09-12-2015 09:42 AM
Dragonus18
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
8
09-09-2015 01:21 AM



Quick Reply: bad @$$ end



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 PM.