12 secs.
How many of you stangers have read this article?
http://www.musclemustangfastfords.co...rts/index.html
[IMG]local://upfiles/50298/EC3C013E5C29484BB60CBC23BE1BC7D4.jpg[/IMG]
http://www.musclemustangfastfords.co...rts/index.html
[IMG]local://upfiles/50298/EC3C013E5C29484BB60CBC23BE1BC7D4.jpg[/IMG]
Yep. I like that article myself. If you read past the hyperbole it seems pretty accurate.
Ive seen some magazine articles you have to wonder about.
I used 2nd run times for more consistent temp.
They got 0.33 and 2.7 mph for CAI/Tune.
I got 0.40 and 3.1 mph.
I would even say the ET's are well within reach.
They ran a 13.19 @ 105.2 on around a 1.9 60' (Estimate based on the other runs). They dont state the DA.
I ran a 13.085 @ 104.95 on a 1.895 60' at 944' DA.
Now Im just hoping I get the 0.17 and 0.7 mph they got fom the driveshaft.
Ive seen some magazine articles you have to wonder about.
I used 2nd run times for more consistent temp.
They got 0.33 and 2.7 mph for CAI/Tune.
I got 0.40 and 3.1 mph.
I would even say the ET's are well within reach.
They ran a 13.19 @ 105.2 on around a 1.9 60' (Estimate based on the other runs). They dont state the DA.
I ran a 13.085 @ 104.95 on a 1.895 60' at 944' DA.
Now Im just hoping I get the 0.17 and 0.7 mph they got fom the driveshaft.
ORIGINAL: TinPony
My actual experience confirms one of thhe things they pointed out, Heat does slow this engine down. Mine always does best when not too warm on the veryfirst run...
My actual experience confirms one of thhe things they pointed out, Heat does slow this engine down. Mine always does best when not too warm on the veryfirst run...
If I hot lap I loose a 0.10-0.15. Mine doesnt seem as severe as theirs.
Of course I have a 195F Termostat so actual engine temp may be to high even on the best runs.
Their car had a 180F.


