RONA3L3
03-28-2008, 09:04 AM
#22
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,276
RE: RONA3L3
Between the 2, the Cervinis kit is way better, although there are some aspects I dont like.
If I go this direction I have a hybrid kit I think would look outstanding.
Cervinis C series Hood
Cervinis C series front valance (complete with black grilles, and fog lights)
CDC C scoops
Roush side skirts
Roush rear valance with square tips
Street Scenes Gen 1 ducktail
Painted Gloss black superstripe, with side stripes. (On silver car)
20" anthracite Shelby Redlines.
If only the economic stimulus was $12,000 instead of $1200.
If I go this direction I have a hybrid kit I think would look outstanding.
Cervinis C series Hood
Cervinis C series front valance (complete with black grilles, and fog lights)
CDC C scoops
Roush side skirts
Roush rear valance with square tips
Street Scenes Gen 1 ducktail
Painted Gloss black superstripe, with side stripes. (On silver car)
20" anthracite Shelby Redlines.
If only the economic stimulus was $12,000 instead of $1200.
03-28-2008, 10:34 AM
#25
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East Moline, IL
Posts: 1,852
RE: RONA3L3
I also prefer the Cervini's kit. The BBR/Ronaele kit is too closely based on the kit for the '67. The lines of the '67 were much softer and rounder. The S197 is retro, but has very sharp lines. The Cervini's kit conforms to that a lot better. I do like the back bumper better, however, and may someday upgrade to that.
08-27-2008, 10:31 PM
#26
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 8
Ronaele vs. Cervini
Ok I think I have pretty good taste, here's my opinion, everything on the Cervini looks great except for the rear end, The Ronaele has the better spoiler/ rear view. Has anyone seen the ronaele mustang eleanor you tube video from web rides tv, The Engine sounds incredible, he says they switch the 4.6 with a 5.0 with new pistons and heads. I wanted to know how much that would cost, Thanks
08-28-2008, 06:57 AM
#27
S197 Section Modder-ator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 13,373
Cost too much! How's that?
Try their web site or dig out a 2 year old thread lol.
I agree with you though...
The 5.0 will always sound better.
The 3v engines (4.6 or 5.4) are too hard to extract a good sound IMO.
But they can go like stick!
Good luck.
Try their web site or dig out a 2 year old thread lol.
I agree with you though...
The 5.0 will always sound better.
The 3v engines (4.6 or 5.4) are too hard to extract a good sound IMO.
But they can go like stick!
Good luck.
09-03-2008, 08:32 PM
#28
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 592
I dunno I sorta like the smooth lines of the front RONA3LE bumper. I think the cervinis is alil too sharp. I love the fact that it closely resembles the old shelby. I think with a lil' re-arranging of the front foglights it would be better. I actually photoshopped out the cheesy foglights and it looked way better...I dont have the pic on this computer tho. I do agree its over priced...but then again look at how much a Roush bumper costs! Thats just my two cents!
