Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Racing at Low Elevation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2008, 01:29 PM
  #1  
imyy4u
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
imyy4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago (South Loop)
Posts: 685
Default Racing at Low Elevation

Question: lower elevation = denser air = faster car, right?

So what if I were to race my car in death valley, elevation like -282 ft or something, at night, when the temp is in the 40's...do you think in 100% stock form I could crack into the 12's?

Right now in Chicago (elevation:580 ft or so) I can get a 13.498 in the 1/4 in 100% stock form. The difference of 900 feet should make quite a difference, right?

And if that wouldn't do it, what if I raced at the Dead Sea in Israel, elevation -1350 ft? Think I could do 12's in stock form?

I don't know why, but I have an obsession with trying to get my car in the 12's in 100% stock form, no mods, no tunes, nothing. I do lower rear tire pressure and raise front tire pressure, but that's it. I even left the spare tire and all carpets etc. in my car. So, any input on how I can get in the 12's in stock form would be helpful - even if it means racing next to the Dead Sea in Israel :-)
imyy4u is offline  
Old 07-11-2008, 02:06 PM
  #2  
RedStang06
2nd Gear Member
 
RedStang06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 181
Default RE: Racing at Low Elevation

I don't think it's gonna make that big of a difference, but we'll see if others agree.
RedStang06 is offline  
Old 07-11-2008, 02:07 PM
  #3  
fullboogie
2nd Gear Member
 
fullboogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location:
Posts: 216
Default RE: Racing at Low Elevation

Don't forget that it's temp, barometric pressure, and humidity that all play a part. As far as your Q about how much ET you would gain, maybe we have a Stock racer on the board who can do the math on this. I would think without more gear it would be awfully hard to do, even in optimal weather.
fullboogie is offline  
Old 07-11-2008, 02:16 PM
  #4  
Lifter583
4th Gear Member
 
Lifter583's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 1,440
Default RE: Racing at Low Elevation

The biggest factor is air temp. The colder the air, the denser the oxygen molecules in a cubic foot of air. SO you must calculate the O2 concentration in a cubic foot of the atmosphere you are intaking, and the cubic foot/sec of your intake. Elevation is not the major factor, it is one variable in the equation. Then on the other side, with denser air, there is more resistance against the car in motion.
Lifter583 is offline  
Old 07-11-2008, 03:13 PM
  #5  
fullboogie
2nd Gear Member
 
fullboogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location:
Posts: 216
Default RE: Racing at Low Elevation

The density altitude (DA) factors all the things I mentioned above. You don't need to calculate the atmospheric O2 or cubic ft/min of the intake system. As I said, someone who races Stock or SS will have the formulas to account for all this.
fullboogie is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SSRFUZZY
Members Other Vehicles
6
01-06-2016 08:22 PM
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
3
09-18-2015 12:27 PM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
09-16-2015 07:53 PM
dalefrancis88
5.0L General Discussion
2
09-11-2015 07:15 AM
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
1
09-09-2015 10:30 AM



Quick Reply: Racing at Low Elevation



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 AM.