351 Crate engine - Page 2 - MustangForums.com

Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

351 Crate engine

Reply

 
 
 
Old 01-17-2009, 01:00 AM
  #11  
Black3vGT
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,260
Default

If your gonna do it, do it right;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsKvr...e=channel_page
Black3vGT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 08:57 AM
  #12  
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
pascal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 13,324
Default

It's an old Video but cool conversion...

One problem though...I understand it's a 460ci big block.
Bib block=Big weight

It'd be smarter to stick a 427 (or 460) Stroker out of a aftermarket 351 Windsor block like World Products or similar, mated to a TKO or 6 speed instead of heavy auto trannies.
You'll be adding little weight over a 4.6 but you be looking at 625hp/650torque
Me likey that part.
pascal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 09:02 AM
  #13  
ford4v429
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location:
Posts: 737
Default

gonna get awful noseheavy aint it?
if going to a non-modular based motor, id go the relatively few extra bucks for a bigblock- although a bigblock fan(massive torque off-idle is great fun), gotta admit a blown 4.6 would probably runaway and hide from it just due to the reduced weight- and might actually be less expensive. getting the dash/instruments/idiot lights to 'work' without the electronic throttle, variable cam/charge motion control valves/distributorless ignition, etc might get expensive- let alone a PITA to sort out...now if you could adapt all the new knock sensing/COP ignition, etc to a old torky motor, that would be sweet- but expect some real deep pockets would be needed. saw pics of one with a old 65 427 SOHC under the stock hood, so the sky is the limit on 'what will fit' under the hood, just making it all work will either take a lot of electrical thought, or gutting the computer out and rewiring it oldschool- which would be kinda cool too, but still take a lot more time than just the oldschool level of work involving mounts/crossmembers/driveshaft/tranny-shifter/exhaust/front springs...
find a wrecked gt motor/pcm/harness, put a blower on it and you would probably save a lot of time and money- put a positive displacement blower on it for a few bucks more to boost bottom end torque, you'll have similar powerband, but still have a 'legal' car you can sell someday without getting into trouble for emissions tampering laws...even years after selling it.
ford4v429 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 09:29 AM
  #14  
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
pascal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 13,324
Default

Hey, since you'll be replacing the drive train anyways...
A carb. set up on a stroker will be the cheapest way to go.
It will spank your blown 4.6 and sound so much better.

Regular folks have a mis-conception about carburetors...
On a DD car, it's reliable. You have to re-jet if you travel to a different altitude, that's about it.
I put 100K Florida miles on that engine (picture) without doing any adjustments to the carburetor
Perform like a dream...

Last edited by pascal; 10-04-2009 at 06:56 PM.
pascal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 10:39 AM
  #15  
BruceH
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ......
Posts: 2,057
Default

Delete...

Last edited by BruceH; 11-13-2010 at 11:58 AM.
BruceH is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 12:07 PM
  #16  
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
pascal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 13,324
Default

Sure would be some fabrications...
And it's hard to tell how much it would cost, so in the end, the simplicity of the stroked carbureted mill would lose it's advantage in retrofitting it in the S197 engine bay...
I wish I'd done this before so I knew the labor involved to make it work.
Until then, I can only speculate....

Blowing the V6 is the quick add on power for the minimal money.
Still have to redo the drive train though.
pascal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 01:53 PM
  #17  
CainMotorsports2102
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location:
Posts: 759
Default

Id just build a mod motor....
CainMotorsports2102 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 01:02 PM
  #18  
ABQstang89
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
ABQstang89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: megan fox's dreams
Posts: 643
Default

Thanks for all the input guys. I had originally thought of just taking a GT motor out of a totaled one. that way i could get all the engine mounts too. Its just hard to speculate on cost if i go that way. The only reason i thought of all this was to cut cost on simply trading in my car and getting a GT. Guess i will just have to see how far the price will drop on one.
ABQstang89 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 01:55 PM
  #19  
SixN2
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 33
Default

Something else to consider in this case is whether you want to drive it on the street or not. Depending on your location, you may not be able to register the car for road use unless it has all the applicable emissions equipment for that chassis production year.
SixN2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
 
 
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nick Oliver
V6 S197 General Discussion
6
10-17-2018 04:22 AM
SSRFUZZY
Members Other Vehicles
6
01-06-2016 08:22 PM
AmericanMuscle4.6GT
2005-2014 Mustangs
7
11-10-2015 02:06 PM
TfcCDR
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
1
09-14-2015 12:08 PM
Pyrate Dave
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
8
09-10-2015 07:30 PM

Forum Jump

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Advertising
Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory