2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

Synthetic oil vs. Regular

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 09:47 AM
  #11  
OhioState87's Avatar
OhioState87
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 401
From: Ohio
Default

OP, if you're up for doing a good bit of reading, there's a lot of information you can take in from the links posted here.

Personally, I have a hard time using something when I know something better is available. I guess it's the peace of mind knowing that I'm using some of the best stuff possible. For my last oil change, I used Amsoil full-synthetic with a Ford Racing oil filter.
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 04:30 PM
  #12  
Mudflap's Avatar
Mudflap
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,062
From: Florida
Default

The way I see it is there are many of these cars rolling around that are not owned by enthusiasts. Those are probably serviced either by Ford, or by Jiffy Lube or similar. I just never hear of massive problems related to oil. I guess in the end, run whatever makes you sleep better at night. I suspect that using even cheap oil with a Fram filter replaced at a reasonable interval, that you'd never notice a difference...
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 10:11 PM
  #13  
squawskier1080's Avatar
squawskier1080
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 133
From: Yuba City, CA
Default

free=good
As long as you use a high quality filter and change the oil at a reasonable interval, you'll never notice a difference. IMO, use the free oil and a good filter and you'll be fine.
Thanks for the mad feedback. I think for now I'll stick with the regular, but after I have more money (ie. pay off the car, haha) and after some performance tweaks such as cai I might try synthetic.
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 01:36 AM
  #14  
Diabolical!'s Avatar
Diabolical!
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,491
From: New Orleans
Default

Having worked in the automotive field for several years, I've been inside of engines that were only run on full synthetic as well as engines that were run on regular (not to mention those that just plain weren't cared for). Trust me, there IS a difference between regular and syntheyic. I've seen motors with over 100K miles where even the piston rings still looked brand new. I only run mobil 1 full synthetic and K&N or mobil 1 filters, depending on what I can find.
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 09:36 AM
  #15  
Mustangmaster's Avatar
Mustangmaster
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 788
From: Lewisetta, Virginia
Default

Nineinchnail1024, I'm sure you've seen all kinds of states of inside of engines. How do you know what type of oil was in each one?
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 10:53 AM
  #16  
302me's Avatar
302me
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 206
From:
Default

Originally Posted by mygt500
I do the same thing!!!!....I would worry about the quality of the oil filter just as much it not more then the oil itself......JMO but full synthetic for me!

Oh and I only have 4850 miles on the car and bought it in early 06

4850 miles on a 3 year old car? holy crap man do you get a chance to enjoy it? I'm not bagging on you, just amazed at the low mileage. I have an 06' and just turned over 100K.

Full synthetic every 5k miles w/ a new filter each oil change, and she still runs like a raped ape.
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 04:37 PM
  #17  
Nuke's Avatar
Nuke
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 16,182
From: PA to KY ('07) to IL ('09) to MS ('10) to FL ('11)
Default

The only benefit of the blends and full syn's is the extended drain time. You'll get equal protection from dino changed at 3,000 miles vs blends changed at 5,000-7,000 miles vs full syns changed at 10,000 or more miles.

The average filter is questionable beyond about 7,000 miles. I use Amsoil's high efficiency filter which can easily handle 15,000 miles. That with Amsoil ASM oil and I change both at about 10,000 miles on the Stang; M1 oil and M1 filter in the SUV (my tow vehicle and DD) at about 8,000 miles.

Last edited by Nuke; Jun 23, 2009 at 04:40 PM.
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 06:28 PM
  #18  
Art161's Avatar
Art161
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,495
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Nuke
The only benefit of the blends and full syn's is the extended drain time. You'll get equal protection from dino changed at 3,000 miles vs blends changed at 5,000-7,000 miles vs full syns changed at 10,000 or more miles.
IMHO I think that the blend or full syn is much better for protecting the engine when starting in cold weather. The blends and full syns flow to all parts of the engine much quicker than dino.
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 09:15 PM
  #19  
jz's Avatar
jz
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 763
From: PA
Default

Years ago when I first got into cars I was rebuilding an engine. At the time, I was hell bent on not using synthetic. The engine builder that I was dealing with then was and still is a great guy. We were talking about oils and he said he only uses sythetics and suggests the same to everyone. Upon me disagreeing he showed me two engines, both from his cars. They were both GM 350's one had synthetic it's whole life (over 100,000 miles) from his Camaro, the other had regular it's whole life (still over 100,000 miles) from his dad's work truck. The truck's engine was sludgy, filthy dirty and literally smelled like crap. The one from his Camaro was clean, no sludge and didn't smell anywhere near as offensive. As he continued to disassemble both engines he showed me various parts. Anyone would have been able to tell which engine which part came from.

From that point on I've used strictly synthetic.

But, as others have said it's your car use what you want.
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 07:35 AM
  #20  
Mustangmaster's Avatar
Mustangmaster
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 788
From: Lewisetta, Virginia
Default

JZ, that's good to know. I wonder how the Motorcraft synthetic blend holds up since it's a blend?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 PM.