2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

s197 Ecoboost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 31, 2009 | 09:46 PM
  #1  
mcburns36's Avatar
mcburns36
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 394
From:
Default s197 Ecoboost

Anybody think this would be a good combo?
Old Aug 31, 2009 | 11:31 PM
  #2  
doode's Avatar
doode
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 639
From: British Columbia
Default

aftermarket tuning = lots of potential

makes the base 4.6 seem insignifigant
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 01:24 AM
  #3  
Charlie321's Avatar
Charlie321
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 435
Default

I was told at the dealership that this is likely coming soon. Count me in.
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 02:27 AM
  #4  
RMGraphics's Avatar
RMGraphics
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 184
From: Utah
Default

I would like to see the ecoboost in the base Mustang and the 5.0 in the GT.
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 03:54 AM
  #5  
Tylus's Avatar
Tylus
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,211
From: Hawaii
Default

not a fan of that motor

been following it in the F-150 community since Ford first leaked the concept. Seems great for most common purposes...but I'm just scared of how the Turbo's will hold up to the rigors of hard driving.


but Ford has to counter that V-6 in the Camaro...so yeah, it might be okay for the base Mustang
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 07:35 AM
  #6  
S281 E's Avatar
S281 E
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,469
From:
Default

They will be doing the ecoboost in the mustang and releasing a 5.0 for the GT. I want to see what they decide to do with the cobra.
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 07:48 AM
  #7  
Legion5's Avatar
Legion5
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,497
From: Near Wash. DC Posts: 13,541
Default

There's always the 725 hp Shelby Super Snake setup. I probably only costs a few grand in parts. The elephant in the room Ford has is fuel economy, for every 1 MPG that the car looses it adds $500-$700 to the cost of the car for no good reason.

Last edited by Legion5; Sep 1, 2009 at 07:53 AM.
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 09:46 AM
  #8  
replica's Avatar
replica
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,085
From: WA / TX
Default

I don't see the business logic of putting the ecoboost in a Mustang. Fords that currently have the ecoboost are all $35k+. I'm willing to bet the V6 with all turbo hardware weighs as much or more than a V8 and the gas mileage probably isn't much better and has to run 91+ octane. I'd expect the price of base Mustangs to go up quite a bit with a turbo setup and the need to run 91 octane would also make it a poor choice for a base car.

Do I want a turbo V6? Oh hell yeah. Seems like a poor business decision though.
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 01:03 PM
  #9  
onederful100's Avatar
onederful100
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,130
From: Honolulu, HI
Default

i would rather see a TT GT or TT gt500, the v6 keep it cheap bc thats usually why people buy it bc its more affordable.
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 01:13 PM
  #10  
OhioState87's Avatar
OhioState87
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 401
From: Ohio
Default

Why does it have to be an EcoBoost V-6 in the base model? Why can't it be an EcoBoost I-4? That way, the base Mustang could have the EB I-4 with ~300hp and the GT can have the 5.0 V-8 with 400hp.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 PM.