Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.0 VS 427

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2010, 01:35 AM
  #1  
Surfevo
Thread Starter
 
Surfevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 2
Exclamation 5.0 VS 427

I just read the Oct issue of Auto Eclectic and they featured 2 Mustangs. The 2011 Roush Stage 2 and a unlimited budget build 65' fastback.

Issue is here:
http://autoeclectic.com/current-issue

After reading it I thought, if I could only have one Mustang for the rest of my life what would it be a classic restored with every detail the way I want it or and new modern 5.0? A hard choice.......

What would you guys choose?
Surfevo is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 02:50 AM
  #2  
bakerjd
5th Gear Member
 
bakerjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,874
Default

i would get the 65' hands down!
bakerjd is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 05:39 AM
  #3  
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
pascal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 13,373
Default

65 for sure.
Restomod FTW!!!!
pascal is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 06:23 AM
  #4  
2005Redfire6
6th Gear Member
 
2005Redfire6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 12,260
Default

I'm from a younger generation so... 5.0 that I'll keep for decades lol.
2005Redfire6 is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 10:48 AM
  #5  
Hecubus28
 
Hecubus28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: AR
Posts: 38
Default

Definitely the 65.
Hecubus28 is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 11:15 AM
  #6  
Blue GT Mustang
2nd Gear Member
 
Blue GT Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In.
Posts: 154
Default

No decision for me...the '65 especially with the K code engine, 4 speed, Guardsman Blue and pony interior.
Blue GT Mustang is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 11:15 AM
  #7  
05xrunner
4th Gear Member
 
05xrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 1,269
Default

I am not into old cars and like technology..so 5.0 all the way for me.
05xrunner is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 11:46 AM
  #8  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

Kind of a no-brainer. Take the best of both worlds.

The old car with only enough new technology to let it run with more power, run cleaner, and run more efficiently. Add enough chassis development to keep up with the best of today's cars.

Oh yeah, make it a wide-body.

Something like this . . .


with a complete (but simple) interior, a basic radio/CD player, and HVAC.

Twenty years ago I'd have left the AC off the list, but my tolerance to heat stress isn't nearly as good now as it was then. I'll still leave most everything else off because it isn't necessary for enjoyment of the drive.


Norm

Last edited by Norm Peterson; 10-15-2010 at 11:49 AM.
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 05:29 PM
  #9  
808muscle
5th Gear Member
 
808muscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Maui
Posts: 4,752
Default

A 65 would be cool, but I gotta be comfortable and I never liked the old school interiors at all. Gimme a fiveOh!
808muscle is offline  
Old 10-15-2010, 05:48 PM
  #10  
onederful100
6th Gear Member
 
onederful100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 6,130
Default

neither
i will mod my 2007 and beat both of them!
onederful100 is offline  


Quick Reply: 5.0 VS 427



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 AM.