Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

catch can's

Old 03-08-2012, 11:27 AM
  #21  
UPRSharad
Former Sponsor
 
UPRSharad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: FL
Posts: 2,570
Default

Originally Posted by wcgman
So on the 2010, you install this on the driver's side or passenger side of the engine? In the UPR install pics from the UPR website, its attached on the passenger side, but in both the pics in this thread, its on the drivers side.

Whats more, does anyone with a 2010 GT and a Roush M90 have a catch can installed and has pics or product recommendations? I need to get a better pic, but I dont see a lot of room to put one in there.
Our kit comes with enough hose to put the can basically anywhere you want, and it's the good fuel & oil certified hose. I only used probably less than half of the hose on my car.
UPRSharad is offline  
Old 03-08-2012, 12:21 PM
  #22  
jdmcbride
4th Gear Member
 
jdmcbride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Palm Beach to South Carolina
Posts: 1,567
Default

Originally Posted by UPRSharad
Our kit comes with enough hose to put the can basically anywhere you want, and it's the good fuel & oil certified hose. I only used probably less than half of the hose on my car.
My UPR catch can came with a flimsy heater hose, which has been know to collapse under vacuum. I had to purchase a marine-grade fuel line hose for my install.

Last edited by jdmcbride; 03-08-2012 at 12:29 PM.
jdmcbride is offline  
Old 03-08-2012, 12:23 PM
  #23  
highline
4th Gear Member
 
highline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,482
Default

^^^hmmm good to know
highline is offline  
Old 03-08-2012, 01:12 PM
  #24  
SoCalGT08
 
SoCalGT08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ca
Posts: 48
Default

I went with JLT because install is about 30 seconds.....simple plug and play...hoses and fittings included



SoCalGT08 is offline  
Old 03-08-2012, 01:28 PM
  #25  
GT/CS_2011
1st Gear Member
 
GT/CS_2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 55
Default

I spoke with JLT on the subject of oil separators for Coyote engines. You need to have one on the PVC side and if you are seeing oil on the throttle plate then you need one for the drivers side. If you don't see oil in the catch after several hundred miles, it is not working.

The plastic ones, once the level starts to rise bypass. The Steeda, UPR, JLT oil separators hold a lot and should only need to be emptied when you change the oil.

Since I have a cheap plastic one on my pvc side I am going to replace it. I am going to check and see if I need 2 or not.
GT/CS_2011 is offline  
Old 03-08-2012, 04:28 PM
  #26  
Roy_R
4th Gear Member
 
Roy_R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,486
Default

All these filters contain an element inside that is supposed to catch the oil by condensation. Note: The material is important, last thing you want is to have the wire sucked into your intake!! That's why I selected this one...

https://mustangforums.com/forum/2005...d-engines.html

Last edited by Roy_R; 03-14-2012 at 12:40 PM.
Roy_R is offline  
Old 03-08-2012, 04:36 PM
  #27  
SteedaBrandon
Former Sponsor
 
SteedaBrandon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: n/a
Posts: 778
Default

Originally Posted by Roy_R
All these filters contain an element inside that is supposed to catch the oil by condensation. Note: The material is important, last think you want is to have the wire sucked into your intake!! That's why I selected this one...

https://mustangforums.com/forum/2005...d-engines.html
Our's will not cause you to 'have wire sucked into the intake.'
SteedaBrandon is offline  
Old 03-08-2012, 05:12 PM
  #28  
GT/CS_2011
1st Gear Member
 
GT/CS_2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 55
Talking

After speaking with a couple of different places and people, I ended up ordering the Steeda 5.0....I don't know how much difference there is between any of them. But Steeda's looked the best and of course if it's shiny it's faster right? J/K
GT/CS_2011 is offline  
Old 03-08-2012, 05:23 PM
  #29  
GT/CS_2011
1st Gear Member
 
GT/CS_2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 55
Default

Originally Posted by Roy_R
All these filters contain an element inside that is supposed to catch the oil by condensation. Note: The material is important, last think you want is to have the wire sucked into your intake!! That's why I selected this one...

https://mustangforums.com/forum/2005...d-engines.html

Moroso cut and pasted from the referenced thread "There is a steel wool type filter elimate inside but it is not steel wool"

What is that supposed to mean, lol
GT/CS_2011 is offline  
Old 03-08-2012, 06:37 PM
  #30  
moosestang
6th Gear Member
 
moosestang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 11,278
Default

Originally Posted by outceltj
U can use a breather. I have a catch can on the driver side and a breather on the passenger. It works well and oil does not just go everywhere. I do clean my engine bay about once a month. So if your looking to completely get rid of it breathers would be what u need
I've said this several times now, but here it goes again. How can you have a breather on the passenger side and catch can on the drivers side? Is your catch can still plumbed to the intake manifold? If so, then you are sucking in unmetered air through the crankcase from your breather. Both sides of the crankcase are connected.
moosestang is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: catch can's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 AM.