4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

14.2 @ 99 mph

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 10:58 PM
  #1  
freeunit's Avatar
freeunit
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 457
From:
Default 14.2 @ 99 mph

Alright so i just ran a 14.2 @ 99 with a 2.20 60ft time. i was wonerdering if you think that looks about right. i mean running at 99 MPH should my time be lower and do you think my 60ft time could be lower? Im going to be installing my U/L CA's soon should that bring my time down?

Thanks for any helpful info

brian
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 11:00 PM
  #2  
nanaki's Avatar
nanaki
Retired MF Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,891
Default RE: 14.2 @ 99 mph

are you completely stock? if so, then that's a good time.
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 11:01 PM
  #3  
randy78045's Avatar
randy78045
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,054
From: Laredo, TEXAS
Default RE: 14.2 @ 99 mph

cut that 60 foot time down.... that will help...
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 11:02 PM
  #4  
freeunit's Avatar
freeunit
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 457
From:
Default RE: 14.2 @ 99 mph

No i have pulleys, TB/P, CAI, NON catted h, flowmaster cat back. So i think it is not that good of a time but im not sure. Im an auto too.
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 11:02 PM
  #5  
72MachOne99GT's Avatar
72MachOne99GT
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,907
From: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Default RE: 14.2 @ 99 mph

if it was stock, i'd have trouble believe it,,
just because of the 2.2 60' and still a 14.2, but im not gonna make a deal out of it

im sure its more than possilbe

but like nanaki said, congrats on those times (stock or not)

however, if you cut that 60' down any, your trap is gonna dip a bit
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 11:44 PM
  #6  
czwalga00gt's Avatar
czwalga00gt
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,062
From: Pittsburgh/Dayton
Default RE: 14.2 @ 99 mph

Look at my 60' compared to times... i've never trapped about 98.00 mph ever. So no your mph is not slow lol.
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 11:52 PM
  #7  
bigedog8's Avatar
bigedog8
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 969
From:
Default RE: 14.2 @ 99 mph

ORIGINAL: 72MachOne99GT

if it was stock, i'd have trouble believe it,,
just because of the 2.2 60' and still a 14.2, but im not gonna make a deal out of it

im sure its more than possilbe

but like nanaki said, congrats on those times (stock or not)

however, if you cut that 60' down any, your trap is gonna dip a bit
u doubt everyone when they post a time man. I ran a few 14.2's with 2.2 60's when all my car had was a k&n filter...

for an auto its ok, but i would think u could get some better times. but that was the same mph as mine was stock. so id say your mods have helped you out get your mph up. but for an auto u could use a lot better 60'. but not a bad run at all though, get thos CA's on and itll help u a lot.
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 11:54 PM
  #8  
XxphantomsnypzxX's Avatar
XxphantomsnypzxX
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 942
Default RE: 14.2 @ 99 mph

get a shift kit+ high stall convertor+ tranny cooler, guaranteed you'll be in the mid 13s
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 03:55 AM
  #9  
sandcracker21's Avatar
sandcracker21
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,957
From:
Default RE: 14.2 @ 99 mph

some mid-length headers would help you a TON with ur setup

i would also get a good tune to help expesially with the auto....


what tires are you runing on?
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 04:20 AM
  #10  
freeunit's Avatar
freeunit
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 457
From:
Default RE: 14.2 @ 99 mph

i have kuhmo supra 275/40/18's in the rear and 235/40/18 in the front. I think i might have been able to launch harder but i was to worried about traction.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 PM.