4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

BBK > MAC?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 31, 2006 | 08:40 PM
  #1  
so1o2k3's Avatar
so1o2k3
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,882
From:
Default BBK > MAC?

I've heard that BBK is a better company than MAC as far as the quality of their products. I am thinking of getting a set of LT Headers and shorty O/R H-pipe, but for the price, is BBK worth the extra money even if I plan on getting ceramic headers for either company?
Old May 31, 2006 | 08:41 PM
  #2  
code3GT's Avatar
code3GT
Mustang Nazi
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,444
From: Texas, baby
Default RE: BBK > MAC?

I have MAC's. I think they are comparable to BBK's. If you want the best...get Kook's or JBA's.
Old May 31, 2006 | 08:43 PM
  #3  
sprostang's Avatar
sprostang
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,190
From: Illinois
Default RE: BBK > MAC?

Go with BBK. Ceramic is the best. The MAC headers dont bolt up very well.
Old May 31, 2006 | 08:46 PM
  #4  
meebix's Avatar
meebix
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,494
From: NJ
Default RE: BBK > MAC?

I went with BBKs just because of the fitment issue. They are probably both the same quality, but I can't speak for MAC.

All I can say is that I LOVE my BBK LTs, great quality, good fitment, no problems.

Don't get a BBK midpipe though, get a MAC H if you want an H. I have heard BBKs midpipes are very raspy and poppy and choppy and all that stuff.
Old May 31, 2006 | 08:50 PM
  #5  
so1o2k3's Avatar
so1o2k3
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,882
From:
Default RE: BBK > MAC?

I don't really care about the difficulty fittment/installation because I will not do it, as long as the end result is the same, I want the cheapest one I can get. I guess I'll get the MAC noncatted Prochamber H-pipe, but as for the ceramic headers, MAC is cheaper than BBK? Someone convince me of either way.
Old May 31, 2006 | 08:54 PM
  #6  
meebix's Avatar
meebix
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,494
From: NJ
Default RE: BBK > MAC?

MAC Cermamic LTs = $350

BBK Ceramic LTs = $480

Either way you go, you will be fine, yes MAC is cheaper, but if you are having someone do it. In the long run, MACs will probably cost just as much as the BBKs because whoever is doing the install is going to have to dremel the flanges, like Code, to get the fitment correct. So either way you are going to make up for the cost difference with the MACs on the labor because your installer is going to have to take time away from getting them on the car, to get them lined up.

Catch my drift. I had mine installed too, and it took him 5 hours just to get the BBKs in which line up perfectly...
Old May 31, 2006 | 08:58 PM
  #7  
so1o2k3's Avatar
so1o2k3
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,882
From:
Default RE: BBK > MAC?

Then it's done! I will get BBK LT ceramic coated headers and MAC Prochamber O/R H pipe! Now...just to save the $$ for it
Old May 31, 2006 | 09:05 PM
  #8  
meebix's Avatar
meebix
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,494
From: NJ
Default RE: BBK > MAC?

Then it's done! I will get BBK LT ceramic coated headers and MAC Prochamber O/R H pipe! Now...just to save the $$ for it
Heh, yea. I went through this period too. Its all worth it though eventually.
Old May 31, 2006 | 09:32 PM
  #9  
rbstang's Avatar
rbstang
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,608
From: Wilmington, NC
Default RE: BBK > MAC?

from what ive seen MAC makes great midpipes and thats about it....
Old May 31, 2006 | 09:49 PM
  #10  
so1o2k3's Avatar
so1o2k3
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,882
From:
Default RE: BBK > MAC?

would the BBK LT headers fit onto the shorty MAC o/r Hpipe?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:32 AM.