Dyno Results..
12-09-2006, 02:44 PM
#1
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Douglassville, Pennsylvania
Posts: 886
Dyno Results..
Made 2 pulls on the dyno just a little bit ago.
Only performance mods are Flowmaster catback and MAC off road h. With some little ****ty K&N filter thing lol
1st run- 275.9 rwhp 268.7 rwtq
2nd run- 273.7 rwhp 265.2 rwtq
Overall im hapy with it. Im going to be doing alot to my car over the winter and in the spring im gonna run again so i can compare.
Only performance mods are Flowmaster catback and MAC off road h. With some little ****ty K&N filter thing lol
1st run- 275.9 rwhp 268.7 rwtq
2nd run- 273.7 rwhp 265.2 rwtq
Overall im hapy with it. Im going to be doing alot to my car over the winter and in the spring im gonna run again so i can compare.
12-09-2006, 02:48 PM
#2
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
RE: Dyno Results..
ORIGINAL: gsxrstang69
Made 2 pulls on the dyno just a little bit ago.
Only performance mods are Flowmaster catback and MAC off road h. With some little ****ty K&N filter thing lol
1st run- 275.9 rwhp 268.7 rwtq
2nd run- 273.7 rwhp 265.2 rwtq
Overall im hapy with it. Im going to be doing alot to my car over the winter and in the spring im gonna run again so i can compare.
Made 2 pulls on the dyno just a little bit ago.
Only performance mods are Flowmaster catback and MAC off road h. With some little ****ty K&N filter thing lol
1st run- 275.9 rwhp 268.7 rwtq
2nd run- 273.7 rwhp 265.2 rwtq
Overall im hapy with it. Im going to be doing alot to my car over the winter and in the spring im gonna run again so i can compare.
What dyno was it on? Your TQ numbers are a little low I would think, but I have no personal experence with the 4v engines.
12-09-2006, 03:02 PM
#6
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,893
RE: Dyno Results..
Brans.. that's totally inaccurate. You feel more torque, because the 4v's full amount of torque comes into play a bit later. The 4v still make more torque then the 2v, the tor may be higher then hp in the 2v, and not as much as the 4v - that i am not sure about. but the 4v>2v in both hp and tor.
The truth behind butt dynos.. haha....
Nice numbers though man... not to bad for what you have on the car...
The truth behind butt dynos.. haha....
Nice numbers though man... not to bad for what you have on the car...
ORIGINAL: bransdaman78
2v seem to make more tq from what I have seen... its the one thing we got
2v seem to make more tq from what I have seen... its the one thing we got
12-09-2006, 04:27 PM
#9
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,893
RE: Dyno Results..
Stang it's not like the older 2v motors... They make really just as much hp as the 01' Cobras...
ORIGINAL: stang2000
wow noones going to say BS, that's too high for those bolt ons and with a non-pi motor?
wow noones going to say BS, that's too high for those bolt ons and with a non-pi motor?