4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

SRA IRS Drivetrain loss

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 07:57 PM
  #1  
Sxynerd's Avatar
Sxynerd
Thread Starter
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 11,786
From: Virginia
Default SRA IRS Drivetrain loss

What's the Difference in Drivetrain loss for an IRS system compared to a SRA?


I'll should make a sticky with everything I learn for my 30 threads on IRS!
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 03:26 PM
  #2  
Sxynerd's Avatar
Sxynerd
Thread Starter
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 11,786
From: Virginia
Default

Hey Loooooosers, answer the question! LOL.
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 03:39 PM
  #3  
hpwrestler220's Avatar
hpwrestler220
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,817
From: NJ
Default

ummm. ALLL OF IT. you lose all the power you had.. you now have 0hp.. sucksss =/
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 03:55 PM
  #4  
Sxynerd's Avatar
Sxynerd
Thread Starter
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 11,786
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by hpwrestler220
ummm. ALLL OF IT. you lose all the power you had.. you now have 0hp.. sucksss =/
Meany!
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 03:59 PM
  #5  
MineralGrey's Avatar
MineralGrey
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 901
From: MA
Default

I might be wrong but wouldn't it be 3% lower because it has the aluminum d/s and isn't the power to the wheels calculated by the linear force through the drive train?
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 04:05 PM
  #6  
cliffyk's Avatar
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,937
From: Saint Augustine, FL
Default

IRS (as in retrofit) does not necessarily mean aluminum driveshaft, however you raise an interesting point--and that could be that Ford used the aluminum d/s to offset the inherent (and variable) losses in the IRS' CV joints.

Could be a wash, could be a net loss or gain--I've never seen any serious evaluations. Ford certainly has them but I doubt they'll be sharing anytime soon...
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 05:10 PM
  #7  
Sxynerd's Avatar
Sxynerd
Thread Starter
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 11,786
From: Virginia
Default

Basically I want to know what I'm going to loose when I install my IRS.
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 05:26 PM
  #8  
cliffyk's Avatar
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,937
From: Saint Augustine, FL
Default

I understand, the answer is that if you are road-racing don't worry about it, power loss to the wheels will be offset by much improved handling--and if you are a straight-liner than why are you installing an IRS?
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 05:41 PM
  #9  
Stevecooper's Avatar
Stevecooper
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 912
From: Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by sxynerd
Basically I want to know what I'm going to loose when I install my IRS.
If you are going to trade your solid axle for the IRS with out spending much cash then its worth it. Otherwise get a PHB / TQ arm setup from Griggs or MM.
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 08:19 PM
  #10  
Sxynerd's Avatar
Sxynerd
Thread Starter
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 11,786
From: Virginia
Default

I paid $1,100 for 2004 IRS (10k miles) with brand new Bassani exhaust. I do do some straight line stuff, mostly from a roll because the F-bodies in my area are all gay. Hp wise I'll be in the mid 500's so the loss would be unnoticeable, mostly. I'll be doing all the bushings and braces as well.

Since I'm a convertible I wont be doing any track racing anyway. This was mostly a comfort decision. I drive my car way too much for it to ride like a truck anymore. lol



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 PM.