4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

SRA IRS Drivetrain loss

Old 09-30-2008, 07:57 PM
  #1  
Sxynerd
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,786
Default SRA IRS Drivetrain loss

What's the Difference in Drivetrain loss for an IRS system compared to a SRA?


I'll should make a sticky with everything I learn for my 30 threads on IRS!
Sxynerd is offline  
Old 10-01-2008, 03:26 PM
  #2  
Sxynerd
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,786
Default

Hey Loooooosers, answer the question! LOL.
Sxynerd is offline  
Old 10-01-2008, 03:39 PM
  #3  
hpwrestler220
6th Gear Member
 
hpwrestler220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,817
Default

ummm. ALLL OF IT. you lose all the power you had.. you now have 0hp.. sucksss =/
hpwrestler220 is offline  
Old 10-01-2008, 03:55 PM
  #4  
Sxynerd
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,786
Default

Originally Posted by hpwrestler220
ummm. ALLL OF IT. you lose all the power you had.. you now have 0hp.. sucksss =/
Meany!
Sxynerd is offline  
Old 10-01-2008, 03:59 PM
  #5  
MineralGrey
3rd Gear Member
 
MineralGrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 901
Default

I might be wrong but wouldn't it be 3% lower because it has the aluminum d/s and isn't the power to the wheels calculated by the linear force through the drive train?
MineralGrey is offline  
Old 10-01-2008, 04:05 PM
  #6  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

IRS (as in retrofit) does not necessarily mean aluminum driveshaft, however you raise an interesting point--and that could be that Ford used the aluminum d/s to offset the inherent (and variable) losses in the IRS' CV joints.

Could be a wash, could be a net loss or gain--I've never seen any serious evaluations. Ford certainly has them but I doubt they'll be sharing anytime soon...
cliffyk is offline  
Old 10-01-2008, 05:10 PM
  #7  
Sxynerd
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,786
Default

Basically I want to know what I'm going to loose when I install my IRS.
Sxynerd is offline  
Old 10-01-2008, 05:26 PM
  #8  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

I understand, the answer is that if you are road-racing don't worry about it, power loss to the wheels will be offset by much improved handling--and if you are a straight-liner than why are you installing an IRS?
cliffyk is offline  
Old 10-01-2008, 05:41 PM
  #9  
Stevecooper
3rd Gear Member
 
Stevecooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 912
Default

Originally Posted by sxynerd
Basically I want to know what I'm going to loose when I install my IRS.
If you are going to trade your solid axle for the IRS with out spending much cash then its worth it. Otherwise get a PHB / TQ arm setup from Griggs or MM.
Stevecooper is offline  
Old 10-01-2008, 08:19 PM
  #10  
Sxynerd
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,786
Default

I paid $1,100 for 2004 IRS (10k miles) with brand new Bassani exhaust. I do do some straight line stuff, mostly from a roll because the F-bodies in my area are all gay. Hp wise I'll be in the mid 500's so the loss would be unnoticeable, mostly. I'll be doing all the bushings and braces as well.

Since I'm a convertible I wont be doing any track racing anyway. This was mostly a comfort decision. I drive my car way too much for it to ride like a truck anymore. lol
Sxynerd is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: SRA IRS Drivetrain loss



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 AM.